我勒个去背景的轮廓

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jan Rolletschek
{"title":"我勒个去背景的轮廓","authors":"Jan Rolletschek","doi":"10.1515/asch-2019-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1904, Constantin Brunner called Gustav Landauer the »most important exponent of anarchism in Germany«. In 1911, Landauer admired Brunner as »one of the most powerful thinkers« he knew. From 1903 until 1911 the two of them developed an intense intellectual friendship, sharing an interest in epistemology, mysticism and the philosophy of Spinoza. Their practical philosophies diverged quite substantially however. While Brunner believed in an anthropological divide within humankind, Landauer strove to integrate humankind on the basis of a spiritual renewal. The article attempts to outline their relationship and provide some clues as to what was at stake in the conflict that ended it.","PeriodicalId":40863,"journal":{"name":"Aschkenas-Zeitschrift fuer Geschichte und Kultur der Juden","volume":"29 1","pages":"385 - 424"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/asch-2019-0021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gustav Landauer und Constantin Brunner. Umrisse einer Begegnung\",\"authors\":\"Jan Rolletschek\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/asch-2019-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In 1904, Constantin Brunner called Gustav Landauer the »most important exponent of anarchism in Germany«. In 1911, Landauer admired Brunner as »one of the most powerful thinkers« he knew. From 1903 until 1911 the two of them developed an intense intellectual friendship, sharing an interest in epistemology, mysticism and the philosophy of Spinoza. Their practical philosophies diverged quite substantially however. While Brunner believed in an anthropological divide within humankind, Landauer strove to integrate humankind on the basis of a spiritual renewal. The article attempts to outline their relationship and provide some clues as to what was at stake in the conflict that ended it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aschkenas-Zeitschrift fuer Geschichte und Kultur der Juden\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"385 - 424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/asch-2019-0021\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aschkenas-Zeitschrift fuer Geschichte und Kultur der Juden\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/asch-2019-0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aschkenas-Zeitschrift fuer Geschichte und Kultur der Juden","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/asch-2019-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1904年,康斯坦丁·布伦纳称古斯塔夫·兰道尔为“德国无政府主义最重要的代表人物”。1911年,兰道尔称赞布伦纳是他所认识的“最有影响力的思想家之一”。从1903年到1911年,他们两人在知识上建立了深厚的友谊,对认识论、神秘主义和斯宾诺莎的哲学都很感兴趣。然而,他们的实践哲学大相径庭。布鲁纳相信人类内部存在着人类学的分裂,而兰道尔则努力在精神更新的基础上整合人类。这篇文章试图勾勒出他们之间的关系,并提供一些线索,说明在这场冲突中,什么是最危险的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gustav Landauer und Constantin Brunner. Umrisse einer Begegnung
Abstract In 1904, Constantin Brunner called Gustav Landauer the »most important exponent of anarchism in Germany«. In 1911, Landauer admired Brunner as »one of the most powerful thinkers« he knew. From 1903 until 1911 the two of them developed an intense intellectual friendship, sharing an interest in epistemology, mysticism and the philosophy of Spinoza. Their practical philosophies diverged quite substantially however. While Brunner believed in an anthropological divide within humankind, Landauer strove to integrate humankind on the basis of a spiritual renewal. The article attempts to outline their relationship and provide some clues as to what was at stake in the conflict that ended it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信