一项基于理论的干预措施的随机对照试验,以促使一线工作人员接种季节性流感疫苗

K. Schmidtke, P. Nightingale, K. Reeves, S. Gallier, I. Vlaev, S. Watson, R. Lilford
{"title":"一项基于理论的干预措施的随机对照试验,以促使一线工作人员接种季节性流感疫苗","authors":"K. Schmidtke, P. Nightingale, K. Reeves, S. Gallier, I. Vlaev, S. Watson, R. Lilford","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of reminder letters informed by social normative theory (a type of ‘nudge theory’) on uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination by front-line hospital staff. Design Individually randomised controlled trial. Setting A large acute care hospital in England. Participants Front-line staff employed by the hospital (n=7540) were randomly allocated to one of four reminder types in a factorial design. Interventions The standard letter included only general information directing the staff to take up the vaccine. A second letter highlighted a type of social norm based on peer comparisons. A third letter highlighted a type of social norm based on an appeal to authority. A fourth letter included a combination of the social norms. Main outcome measure The proportion of hospital staff vaccinated on-site. Results Vaccine coverage was 43% (812/1885) in the standard letter group, 43% (818/1885) in the descriptive norms group, 43% (814/1885) in the injunctive norms group and 43% (812/1885) in the combination group. There were no statistically significant effects of either norm or the interaction. The OR for the descriptive norms factor is 1.01 (0.89–1.15) in the absence of the injunctive norms factor and 1.00 (0.88–1.13) in its presence. The OR for the injunctive norms factor is 1.00 (0.88–1.14) in the absence of the descriptive norms factor and 0.99 (0.87–1.12) in its presence. Conclusions We find no evidence that the uptake of the seasonal influenza vaccination is affected by reminders using social norms to motivate uptake.","PeriodicalId":49653,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","volume":"29 1","pages":"189 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009775","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomised controlled trial of a theory-based intervention to prompt front-line staff to take up the seasonal influenza vaccine\",\"authors\":\"K. Schmidtke, P. Nightingale, K. Reeves, S. Gallier, I. Vlaev, S. Watson, R. Lilford\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of reminder letters informed by social normative theory (a type of ‘nudge theory’) on uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination by front-line hospital staff. Design Individually randomised controlled trial. Setting A large acute care hospital in England. Participants Front-line staff employed by the hospital (n=7540) were randomly allocated to one of four reminder types in a factorial design. Interventions The standard letter included only general information directing the staff to take up the vaccine. A second letter highlighted a type of social norm based on peer comparisons. A third letter highlighted a type of social norm based on an appeal to authority. A fourth letter included a combination of the social norms. Main outcome measure The proportion of hospital staff vaccinated on-site. Results Vaccine coverage was 43% (812/1885) in the standard letter group, 43% (818/1885) in the descriptive norms group, 43% (814/1885) in the injunctive norms group and 43% (812/1885) in the combination group. There were no statistically significant effects of either norm or the interaction. The OR for the descriptive norms factor is 1.01 (0.89–1.15) in the absence of the injunctive norms factor and 1.00 (0.88–1.13) in its presence. The OR for the injunctive norms factor is 1.00 (0.88–1.14) in the absence of the descriptive norms factor and 0.99 (0.87–1.12) in its presence. Conclusions We find no evidence that the uptake of the seasonal influenza vaccination is affected by reminders using social norms to motivate uptake.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality & Safety in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"189 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009775\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality & Safety in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

目的评价社会规范理论(一种“推动理论”)提示信对一线医院工作人员接种季节性流感疫苗的有效性。设计个体随机对照试验。英国一家大型急性护理医院。参与者医院雇佣的一线工作人员(n=7540)在析因设计中被随机分配到四种提醒类型中的一种。干预措施标准信件只包括指导工作人员接种疫苗的一般信息。第二封信强调了一种基于同龄人比较的社会规范。第三封信强调了一种基于对权威的呼吁的社会规范。第四封信包含了社会规范的组合。主要结果指标医院工作人员现场接种疫苗的比例。结果标准字母组的疫苗覆盖率为43%(812/1885),描述性规范组为43%(818/1885),禁令性规范组为43%814/1885,联合用药组为43%。无论是常模还是交互作用都没有统计学上的显著影响。在没有禁令规范因子的情况下,描述性规范因子的OR为1.01(0.89-1.15),在有禁令规范因子时为1.00(0.88-1.13)。在没有描述性规范因子的情况下,禁令规范因子的OR为1.00(0.88-1.14),在有描述性规范因子时为0.99(0.87-1.12)。结论我们没有发现任何证据表明季节性流感疫苗的接种受到使用社会规范来激励接种的提醒的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomised controlled trial of a theory-based intervention to prompt front-line staff to take up the seasonal influenza vaccine
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of reminder letters informed by social normative theory (a type of ‘nudge theory’) on uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination by front-line hospital staff. Design Individually randomised controlled trial. Setting A large acute care hospital in England. Participants Front-line staff employed by the hospital (n=7540) were randomly allocated to one of four reminder types in a factorial design. Interventions The standard letter included only general information directing the staff to take up the vaccine. A second letter highlighted a type of social norm based on peer comparisons. A third letter highlighted a type of social norm based on an appeal to authority. A fourth letter included a combination of the social norms. Main outcome measure The proportion of hospital staff vaccinated on-site. Results Vaccine coverage was 43% (812/1885) in the standard letter group, 43% (818/1885) in the descriptive norms group, 43% (814/1885) in the injunctive norms group and 43% (812/1885) in the combination group. There were no statistically significant effects of either norm or the interaction. The OR for the descriptive norms factor is 1.01 (0.89–1.15) in the absence of the injunctive norms factor and 1.00 (0.88–1.13) in its presence. The OR for the injunctive norms factor is 1.00 (0.88–1.14) in the absence of the descriptive norms factor and 0.99 (0.87–1.12) in its presence. Conclusions We find no evidence that the uptake of the seasonal influenza vaccination is affected by reminders using social norms to motivate uptake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Quality & Safety in Health Care 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信