尼日利亚埃基蒂州居民家庭能源消费比较研究

O. Oginni, O. Rominiyi, J. Eiche
{"title":"尼日利亚埃基蒂州居民家庭能源消费比较研究","authors":"O. Oginni, O. Rominiyi, J. Eiche","doi":"10.9734/BJAST/2017/32374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author AOA conceived and designed the study, while authors OTO, OLR and JFE performed the field works and statistical analyses. Author OTO wrote the first draft of the manuscript as part of his M.Eng thesis under the supervision of author AOA. Author AOA reviewed the work for a journal article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. ABSTRACT Aims: The paper compares the Results: The result revealed that, the densely populated area remains the larger consumer of energy content of 827,411.20 MJ (63%) against the sparsely populated areas with 486,267.60 MJ (37%), while on the basis of households’ income level; the energy consumed by the low income earners (790,719.30 MJ) is significantly higher than the high income earners (522,959.49 MJ). Conclusion: The study established that, fuel wood was the poor man’s energy source (6.5%) as well as charcoal (11.2%) majorly used in sparsely populated areas with high demand. Kerosene consumption (29.6%) was positively and significantly influenced by income and population in both locations while, LPG (44.9%) and electricity (7.8%) were used mainly in the densely populated areas. However, the results implied that, there was a positive link between income and choice of energy consumption by households that showed the low income earners consumed more energy than the high income earners due to their cooking frequency and unit energy purchase index.","PeriodicalId":91221,"journal":{"name":"British journal of applied science & technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Residential Household Energy Consumption in Ekiti State-Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"O. Oginni, O. Rominiyi, J. Eiche\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/BJAST/2017/32374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author AOA conceived and designed the study, while authors OTO, OLR and JFE performed the field works and statistical analyses. Author OTO wrote the first draft of the manuscript as part of his M.Eng thesis under the supervision of author AOA. Author AOA reviewed the work for a journal article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. ABSTRACT Aims: The paper compares the Results: The result revealed that, the densely populated area remains the larger consumer of energy content of 827,411.20 MJ (63%) against the sparsely populated areas with 486,267.60 MJ (37%), while on the basis of households’ income level; the energy consumed by the low income earners (790,719.30 MJ) is significantly higher than the high income earners (522,959.49 MJ). Conclusion: The study established that, fuel wood was the poor man’s energy source (6.5%) as well as charcoal (11.2%) majorly used in sparsely populated areas with high demand. Kerosene consumption (29.6%) was positively and significantly influenced by income and population in both locations while, LPG (44.9%) and electricity (7.8%) were used mainly in the densely populated areas. However, the results implied that, there was a positive link between income and choice of energy consumption by households that showed the low income earners consumed more energy than the high income earners due to their cooking frequency and unit energy purchase index.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of applied science & technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of applied science & technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2017/32374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of applied science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2017/32374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

这项工作是由所有作者合作完成的。作者AOA构思并设计了这项研究,而作者OTO、OLR和JFE进行了实地工作和统计分析。作者OTO在作者AOA的监督下撰写了手稿的初稿,作为其硕士论文的一部分。作者AOA为一篇期刊文章评论了这篇作品。所有作者阅读并批准了最终手稿。摘要目的:本文对结果进行了比较:结果表明,人口稠密地区仍然是能源含量的较大消费地区,为827411.20 MJ(63%),而人口稀少地区为486267.60 MJ(37%),而这是基于家庭收入水平;低收入者消耗的能量(790719.30兆焦耳)明显高于高收入者(522959.49兆焦耳)。结论:研究表明,燃料木是穷人的能源(6.5%),木炭(11.2%)主要用于人口稀少、需求量大的地区。煤油消费量(29.6%)受到两个地区收入和人口的积极和显著影响,而液化石油气(44.9%)和电力(7.8%)主要用于人口稠密地区。然而,研究结果表明,收入与家庭能源消费选择之间存在正相关,这表明由于低收入者的烹饪频率和单位能源购买指数,他们消耗的能源比高收入者多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Residential Household Energy Consumption in Ekiti State-Nigeria
This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author AOA conceived and designed the study, while authors OTO, OLR and JFE performed the field works and statistical analyses. Author OTO wrote the first draft of the manuscript as part of his M.Eng thesis under the supervision of author AOA. Author AOA reviewed the work for a journal article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. ABSTRACT Aims: The paper compares the Results: The result revealed that, the densely populated area remains the larger consumer of energy content of 827,411.20 MJ (63%) against the sparsely populated areas with 486,267.60 MJ (37%), while on the basis of households’ income level; the energy consumed by the low income earners (790,719.30 MJ) is significantly higher than the high income earners (522,959.49 MJ). Conclusion: The study established that, fuel wood was the poor man’s energy source (6.5%) as well as charcoal (11.2%) majorly used in sparsely populated areas with high demand. Kerosene consumption (29.6%) was positively and significantly influenced by income and population in both locations while, LPG (44.9%) and electricity (7.8%) were used mainly in the densely populated areas. However, the results implied that, there was a positive link between income and choice of energy consumption by households that showed the low income earners consumed more energy than the high income earners due to their cooking frequency and unit energy purchase index.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信