固定正畸治疗患者细菌生物膜的去除:文献综述

Q4 Medicine
A. Pardo, F. Baccini, R. De Manzoni, M. Viviani, L. Pancheri, A. Zangani, P. Faccioni, U. Luciano, N. Zuffellato, A. Signoriello, F. Melloni, N. Tomizioli, G. Lombardo, N. Zerman, M. Cortellini
{"title":"固定正畸治疗患者细菌生物膜的去除:文献综述","authors":"A. Pardo, F. Baccini, R. De Manzoni, M. Viviani, L. Pancheri, A. Zangani, P. Faccioni, U. Luciano, N. Zuffellato, A. Signoriello, F. Melloni, N. Tomizioli, G. Lombardo, N. Zerman, M. Cortellini","doi":"10.56609/jac.v41i1.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orthodontic treatment is highly popular for restoring functional and facial esthetics in juveniles and adults. However, the prevalence of biofilm-related complications remains high. The objectives of this review are to 1) identify which of the two professional prophylaxis systems analyzed, rubber cup polishing (RCP) and air-powder polishing (APP), is the most effective in removing bacterial biofilm in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment, and 2) the comfort expressed by the patient and any damage caused to the orthodontic device. The search yielded 23 scientific articles, 14 of which were excluded, and 6 met the inclusion criteria. From the studies analyzed, it is, therefore, possible to state that the APP technique is more effective than the RCP technique in removing dental plaque, and treatment is less time-consuming and safer concerning orthodontic devices, as none of the scientific articles examined did APP cause any damage to the orthodontic device or debonding of the brackets.","PeriodicalId":15008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied cosmetology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of bacterial biofilm in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment: a literature review\",\"authors\":\"A. Pardo, F. Baccini, R. De Manzoni, M. Viviani, L. Pancheri, A. Zangani, P. Faccioni, U. Luciano, N. Zuffellato, A. Signoriello, F. Melloni, N. Tomizioli, G. Lombardo, N. Zerman, M. Cortellini\",\"doi\":\"10.56609/jac.v41i1.267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Orthodontic treatment is highly popular for restoring functional and facial esthetics in juveniles and adults. However, the prevalence of biofilm-related complications remains high. The objectives of this review are to 1) identify which of the two professional prophylaxis systems analyzed, rubber cup polishing (RCP) and air-powder polishing (APP), is the most effective in removing bacterial biofilm in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment, and 2) the comfort expressed by the patient and any damage caused to the orthodontic device. The search yielded 23 scientific articles, 14 of which were excluded, and 6 met the inclusion criteria. From the studies analyzed, it is, therefore, possible to state that the APP technique is more effective than the RCP technique in removing dental plaque, and treatment is less time-consuming and safer concerning orthodontic devices, as none of the scientific articles examined did APP cause any damage to the orthodontic device or debonding of the brackets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied cosmetology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied cosmetology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56609/jac.v41i1.267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied cosmetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56609/jac.v41i1.267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正畸治疗在青少年和成年人中非常流行,用于恢复功能和面部美学。然而,生物膜相关并发症的发生率仍然很高。本综述的目的是:1)确定所分析的两种专业预防系统,橡胶杯抛光(RCP)和空气粉末抛光(APP)中哪一种在去除接受固定正畸治疗的患者的细菌生物膜方面最有效,以及2)患者表现出的舒适感和对正畸装置造成的任何损伤。检索得到23篇科学文章,其中14篇被排除在外,6篇符合入选标准。因此,从所分析的研究中可以看出,APP技术在去除牙菌斑方面比RCP技术更有效,而且正畸设备的治疗耗时更少,也更安全,因为在所检查的科学文章中,APP没有对正畸设备造成任何损坏或托槽脱粘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removal of bacterial biofilm in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment: a literature review
Orthodontic treatment is highly popular for restoring functional and facial esthetics in juveniles and adults. However, the prevalence of biofilm-related complications remains high. The objectives of this review are to 1) identify which of the two professional prophylaxis systems analyzed, rubber cup polishing (RCP) and air-powder polishing (APP), is the most effective in removing bacterial biofilm in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment, and 2) the comfort expressed by the patient and any damage caused to the orthodontic device. The search yielded 23 scientific articles, 14 of which were excluded, and 6 met the inclusion criteria. From the studies analyzed, it is, therefore, possible to state that the APP technique is more effective than the RCP technique in removing dental plaque, and treatment is less time-consuming and safer concerning orthodontic devices, as none of the scientific articles examined did APP cause any damage to the orthodontic device or debonding of the brackets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of applied cosmetology
Journal of applied cosmetology Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信