参与式宪政与变革议程:爱尔兰宪法辩论中的社会经济问题

Q4 Social Sciences
J. McEvoy, J. Todd, D. Walsh
{"title":"参与式宪政与变革议程:爱尔兰宪法辩论中的社会经济问题","authors":"J. McEvoy, J. Todd, D. Walsh","doi":"10.1353/isia.2022.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Processes of constitution making and change increasingly involve popular participation and deliberation. Though constitutional theory assumes positive outcomes of participation, we know relatively little about the role of citizens in shaping the constitutional process. This article investigates how the participation of grassroots communities can shape the constitutional agenda, widening debate beyond institutional models to include everyday issues of importance to citizens. In parallel research projects in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, we explored how diverse communities (women’s groups, ethnic minority communities and youth) approach the constitutional question. Participants expressed a desire to participate and a clear intention to change the questions away from contentious high- constitutional issues of sovereignty and borders towards ‘bread and butter’ socio-economic issues. We discuss the ways in which socio-economic issues may be of constitutional significance, we draw lessons from comparative experience, and we propose ways to advance the research agenda on participatory constitutionalism.","PeriodicalId":39181,"journal":{"name":"Irish Studies in International Affairs","volume":"33 1","pages":"140 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participatory Constitutionalism and the Agenda for Change: Socio-economic Issues in Irish Constitutional Debates\",\"authors\":\"J. McEvoy, J. Todd, D. Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/isia.2022.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Processes of constitution making and change increasingly involve popular participation and deliberation. Though constitutional theory assumes positive outcomes of participation, we know relatively little about the role of citizens in shaping the constitutional process. This article investigates how the participation of grassroots communities can shape the constitutional agenda, widening debate beyond institutional models to include everyday issues of importance to citizens. In parallel research projects in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, we explored how diverse communities (women’s groups, ethnic minority communities and youth) approach the constitutional question. Participants expressed a desire to participate and a clear intention to change the questions away from contentious high- constitutional issues of sovereignty and borders towards ‘bread and butter’ socio-economic issues. We discuss the ways in which socio-economic issues may be of constitutional significance, we draw lessons from comparative experience, and we propose ways to advance the research agenda on participatory constitutionalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Studies in International Affairs\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"140 - 171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Studies in International Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/isia.2022.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Studies in International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/isia.2022.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:宪法的制定和修改过程越来越多地涉及民众的参与和审议。尽管宪法理论假设了参与的积极结果,但我们对公民在塑造宪法进程中的作用知之甚少。本文调查了基层社区的参与如何影响宪法议程,将辩论范围扩大到制度模式之外,将对公民重要的日常问题包括在内。在北爱尔兰和爱尔兰共和国的平行研究项目中,我们探讨了不同社区(妇女团体、少数民族社区和青年)如何处理宪法问题。与会者表达了参与的愿望,并明确打算将问题从有争议的主权和边界的高宪法问题转变为“面包和黄油”的社会经济问题。我们讨论了社会经济问题可能具有宪法意义的方式,我们从比较经验中吸取教训,并提出了推进参与式宪政研究议程的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participatory Constitutionalism and the Agenda for Change: Socio-economic Issues in Irish Constitutional Debates
ABSTRACT:Processes of constitution making and change increasingly involve popular participation and deliberation. Though constitutional theory assumes positive outcomes of participation, we know relatively little about the role of citizens in shaping the constitutional process. This article investigates how the participation of grassroots communities can shape the constitutional agenda, widening debate beyond institutional models to include everyday issues of importance to citizens. In parallel research projects in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, we explored how diverse communities (women’s groups, ethnic minority communities and youth) approach the constitutional question. Participants expressed a desire to participate and a clear intention to change the questions away from contentious high- constitutional issues of sovereignty and borders towards ‘bread and butter’ socio-economic issues. We discuss the ways in which socio-economic issues may be of constitutional significance, we draw lessons from comparative experience, and we propose ways to advance the research agenda on participatory constitutionalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Studies in International Affairs
Irish Studies in International Affairs Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信