《现实主义迷魂药:美国文学中的宗教、种族和表演》,林赛·V·雷克森著(评论)

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Carolyn M. Jones Medine
{"title":"《现实主义迷魂药:美国文学中的宗教、种族和表演》,林赛·V·雷克森著(评论)","authors":"Carolyn M. Jones Medine","doi":"10.1353/afa.2022.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Realist Ecstasy: Religion, Race, and Performance in American Literature, Lindsay V. Reckson uses the current scholarship on secularism to examine, as she notes, a period that this theory has ignored: post-Reconstruction America and the emergence of Jim Crow. Reckson argues that this era, with its consolidation of notions of race and its creation of racial segregation, is “central to . . . a regulatory regime of secularism” (5). African American uneasiness with the secular regime, held in place by a predominately Protestant Christian majority culture, is performed in racial, ethnic, artistic, and religious forms. Ecstatic performance of racialized persons, therefore, is multiply located—behind, before, and beside the dominant culture (234)—a formulation that she takes from the “Bacchic performance” (236) in a church in Nella Larsen’s Quicksand (1928). Reckson argues that “realism gives us a sense of how deeply encoded the secular is with structures of white supremacy” (3). As she examines the semiotics of the “frenzied black body,” Reckson argues that even as realism struggles to forget how it is implicated in white supremacy, its effort to leave it behind is haunted by what it tries to contain. For example: “Naturalizing racial and spiritual boundaries as part of its steadfast attention to the material world, realist practice nevertheless remains strikingly animated by ecstasy’s occluded histories of violence” (234), signaling a “very real proximity between ecstasy and terror.” Realism’s autonomy, therefore, is “haunted by what [it] can ever completely forget.” Ecstatic performance, however, happens not just within but also beside these ongoing histories, opening often occluded possibilities of freedom as they both archive the past and present and open “(counter)investments” (235). In Jim Crow America, Reckson writes that secularism is a drama “at or of the skin” (7). Therefore, performance is constrained by a Gordian knot of “racial violence, compulsion, and the ‘religious’ ” (2). Her objects of inquiry are sites of inspiration, contagion, and enthusiasm, religious forms and gestures emerging from the Second Great Awakening, which included emotional, ecstatic, and personal conversion experiences, and which, in its relative openness to people of color, led to reform movements and progressivism. Yet for Reckson, these movements reinscribe rather than transcend racism as they stand within its structures and strictures. Reckson examines the particular fascination in Black spiritual experience with Black and other racialized bodies in ecstasy, while also demonstrating how progressivism is interwoven with racially coded white supremacy. The stability of this secular order is continuously haunted, however, by a Derridean return of what postReconstruction America thought or hoped was dead and buried. This return happens because the material world is structured by this haunting, by the “pervasive systems of racial capital, imperialism, and genocide” that shaped the present moment. Haunting, Reckson argues, “might be the dominant affect of secularism,” and is “integral to what it means to be modern” (5). Secularism is both epistemological and formative as it disciplines the reason and the imagination (6), as her opening example of the figure of Henry Johnson in Stephen Crane’s The Monster (1898) demonstrates. Alongside this disciplining, however, Reckson recognizes how Black bodies in ecstasy and in the case of the Ghost Dance, Native American bodies as well, threaten","PeriodicalId":44779,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realist Ecstasy: Religion, Race, and Performance in American Literature by Lindsay V. Reckson (review)\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn M. Jones Medine\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/afa.2022.0052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Realist Ecstasy: Religion, Race, and Performance in American Literature, Lindsay V. Reckson uses the current scholarship on secularism to examine, as she notes, a period that this theory has ignored: post-Reconstruction America and the emergence of Jim Crow. Reckson argues that this era, with its consolidation of notions of race and its creation of racial segregation, is “central to . . . a regulatory regime of secularism” (5). African American uneasiness with the secular regime, held in place by a predominately Protestant Christian majority culture, is performed in racial, ethnic, artistic, and religious forms. Ecstatic performance of racialized persons, therefore, is multiply located—behind, before, and beside the dominant culture (234)—a formulation that she takes from the “Bacchic performance” (236) in a church in Nella Larsen’s Quicksand (1928). Reckson argues that “realism gives us a sense of how deeply encoded the secular is with structures of white supremacy” (3). As she examines the semiotics of the “frenzied black body,” Reckson argues that even as realism struggles to forget how it is implicated in white supremacy, its effort to leave it behind is haunted by what it tries to contain. For example: “Naturalizing racial and spiritual boundaries as part of its steadfast attention to the material world, realist practice nevertheless remains strikingly animated by ecstasy’s occluded histories of violence” (234), signaling a “very real proximity between ecstasy and terror.” Realism’s autonomy, therefore, is “haunted by what [it] can ever completely forget.” Ecstatic performance, however, happens not just within but also beside these ongoing histories, opening often occluded possibilities of freedom as they both archive the past and present and open “(counter)investments” (235). In Jim Crow America, Reckson writes that secularism is a drama “at or of the skin” (7). Therefore, performance is constrained by a Gordian knot of “racial violence, compulsion, and the ‘religious’ ” (2). Her objects of inquiry are sites of inspiration, contagion, and enthusiasm, religious forms and gestures emerging from the Second Great Awakening, which included emotional, ecstatic, and personal conversion experiences, and which, in its relative openness to people of color, led to reform movements and progressivism. Yet for Reckson, these movements reinscribe rather than transcend racism as they stand within its structures and strictures. Reckson examines the particular fascination in Black spiritual experience with Black and other racialized bodies in ecstasy, while also demonstrating how progressivism is interwoven with racially coded white supremacy. The stability of this secular order is continuously haunted, however, by a Derridean return of what postReconstruction America thought or hoped was dead and buried. This return happens because the material world is structured by this haunting, by the “pervasive systems of racial capital, imperialism, and genocide” that shaped the present moment. Haunting, Reckson argues, “might be the dominant affect of secularism,” and is “integral to what it means to be modern” (5). Secularism is both epistemological and formative as it disciplines the reason and the imagination (6), as her opening example of the figure of Henry Johnson in Stephen Crane’s The Monster (1898) demonstrates. Alongside this disciplining, however, Reckson recognizes how Black bodies in ecstasy and in the case of the Ghost Dance, Native American bodies as well, threaten\",\"PeriodicalId\":44779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/afa.2022.0052\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/afa.2022.0052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《现实主义的狂喜:美国文学中的宗教、种族和表现》一书中,琳赛·v·雷克森利用当前世俗主义的学术研究,正如她所指出的那样,考察了这个理论被忽视的时期:重建后的美国和吉姆·克劳的出现。雷克森认为,这个时代,随着种族观念的巩固和种族隔离的产生,是“对……非裔美国人对世俗政权的不安表现在种族、民族、艺术和宗教等方面,这种不安是由占主导地位的新教基督教占多数的文化所把持的。因此,种族化的人的狂喜表演是多重定位的——在主流文化的背后、之前和旁边(234)——这是她从内拉·拉森的《流沙》(1928)中教堂里的“狂欢表演”(236)中得到的表述。瑞克森认为,“现实主义让我们意识到,世俗与白人至上主义的结构有着多么深刻的联系”(3)。当她审视“疯狂的黑人身体”的符号学时,瑞克森认为,即使现实主义努力忘记自己与白人至上主义的关系,它试图摆脱白人至上主义的努力也被它试图包含的东西所困扰。例如:“将种族和精神的界限作为其对物质世界的坚定关注的一部分,现实主义实践仍然受到狂喜被遮蔽的暴力历史的显著影响”(234),表明“狂喜和恐怖之间非常接近”。因此,现实主义的自主性“被(它)永远无法完全忘记的东西所困扰”。然而,狂喜的表演不仅发生在这些正在进行的历史之中,也发生在这些历史之外,打开了往往被封锁的自由可能性,因为它们既存档了过去和现在,又打开了“(反)投资”(235)。在《吉姆·克劳的美国》中,瑞克森写道,世俗主义是一出“以皮肤为中心”的戏剧(7)。因此,表演受到“种族暴力、强迫和‘宗教’”的纠结(2)的限制。她的研究对象是第二次大觉醒中出现的灵感、传染和热情、宗教形式和姿态的场所,其中包括情感、狂喜和个人转变的经历,而且,在它对有色人种的相对开放中,导致了改革运动和进步主义。然而,对于瑞克森来说,这些运动是在种族主义的结构和限制下重新定义而不是超越种族主义。瑞克森研究了黑人精神体验中对黑人和其他种族化身体的特别迷恋,同时也展示了进步主义是如何与种族编码的白人至上主义交织在一起的。然而,这种世俗秩序的稳定性不断受到一种德里德里式的回归的困扰,这种回归是后建设时期美国认为或希望已经死亡和埋葬的东西。这种回归之所以发生,是因为物质世界是由这种挥之不去的、由塑造当下的“无处不在的种族资本、帝国主义和种族灭绝体系”构成的。雷克森认为,困扰“可能是世俗主义的主要影响”,并且是“现代意义的组成部分”(5)。世俗主义既是认识论的,也是形成性的,因为它规范了理性和想象力(6),正如她在斯蒂芬·克兰的《怪物》(1898)中开篇所举的亨利·约翰逊的例子所证明的那样。然而,除了这种约束之外,Reckson认识到黑人在狂喜中的身体以及在鬼舞的情况下,印第安人的身体是如何威胁的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Realist Ecstasy: Religion, Race, and Performance in American Literature by Lindsay V. Reckson (review)
In Realist Ecstasy: Religion, Race, and Performance in American Literature, Lindsay V. Reckson uses the current scholarship on secularism to examine, as she notes, a period that this theory has ignored: post-Reconstruction America and the emergence of Jim Crow. Reckson argues that this era, with its consolidation of notions of race and its creation of racial segregation, is “central to . . . a regulatory regime of secularism” (5). African American uneasiness with the secular regime, held in place by a predominately Protestant Christian majority culture, is performed in racial, ethnic, artistic, and religious forms. Ecstatic performance of racialized persons, therefore, is multiply located—behind, before, and beside the dominant culture (234)—a formulation that she takes from the “Bacchic performance” (236) in a church in Nella Larsen’s Quicksand (1928). Reckson argues that “realism gives us a sense of how deeply encoded the secular is with structures of white supremacy” (3). As she examines the semiotics of the “frenzied black body,” Reckson argues that even as realism struggles to forget how it is implicated in white supremacy, its effort to leave it behind is haunted by what it tries to contain. For example: “Naturalizing racial and spiritual boundaries as part of its steadfast attention to the material world, realist practice nevertheless remains strikingly animated by ecstasy’s occluded histories of violence” (234), signaling a “very real proximity between ecstasy and terror.” Realism’s autonomy, therefore, is “haunted by what [it] can ever completely forget.” Ecstatic performance, however, happens not just within but also beside these ongoing histories, opening often occluded possibilities of freedom as they both archive the past and present and open “(counter)investments” (235). In Jim Crow America, Reckson writes that secularism is a drama “at or of the skin” (7). Therefore, performance is constrained by a Gordian knot of “racial violence, compulsion, and the ‘religious’ ” (2). Her objects of inquiry are sites of inspiration, contagion, and enthusiasm, religious forms and gestures emerging from the Second Great Awakening, which included emotional, ecstatic, and personal conversion experiences, and which, in its relative openness to people of color, led to reform movements and progressivism. Yet for Reckson, these movements reinscribe rather than transcend racism as they stand within its structures and strictures. Reckson examines the particular fascination in Black spiritual experience with Black and other racialized bodies in ecstasy, while also demonstrating how progressivism is interwoven with racially coded white supremacy. The stability of this secular order is continuously haunted, however, by a Derridean return of what postReconstruction America thought or hoped was dead and buried. This return happens because the material world is structured by this haunting, by the “pervasive systems of racial capital, imperialism, and genocide” that shaped the present moment. Haunting, Reckson argues, “might be the dominant affect of secularism,” and is “integral to what it means to be modern” (5). Secularism is both epistemological and formative as it disciplines the reason and the imagination (6), as her opening example of the figure of Henry Johnson in Stephen Crane’s The Monster (1898) demonstrates. Alongside this disciplining, however, Reckson recognizes how Black bodies in ecstasy and in the case of the Ghost Dance, Native American bodies as well, threaten
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the Division on Black American Literature and Culture of the Modern Language Association, the quarterly journal African American Review promotes a lively exchange among writers and scholars in the arts, humanities, and social sciences who hold diverse perspectives on African American literature and culture. Between 1967 and 1976, the journal appeared under the title Negro American Literature Forum and for the next fifteen years was titled Black American Literature Forum. In 1992, African American Review changed its name for a third time and expanded its mission to include the study of a broader array of cultural formations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信