拉比安:传播的专业主义与共构成的世界

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Chaorong Hua
{"title":"拉比安:传播的专业主义与共构成的世界","authors":"Chaorong Hua","doi":"10.1080/17508061.2021.1989842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Current Chinese cinephilia has developed an obsession with what is known as lapian, a practice that consists of scholarly or professional analysis of films and a fascination with cinematic details both textual and inter-textual. What can be discerned through such a phenomenon are not only Chinese film aficionados’ love for cinema and movie going, but also their aspiration to participate in and contribute to the nation’s emerging film culture. Having originated in classrooms at Beijing Film Academy around 1958, lapian has been disseminated to the country’s myriad of film communities; together with it, is the professionalism of engaging films. Enabled by fan-based platforms on the Internet (especially social networking sites such as Douban, Mtime, and Wechat public accounts), the tactile nature in lapian broke down the barrier between professional film critics (as well as scholars) and ordinary film lovers. On the one hand, the proliferation of lapian among common viewers produces a discourse that competes with professional criticisms in China. Unlike the implicit elitism that pervaded the pre-Internet world of cinephilia (as well as its lapian practices), current Chinese film communities have appropriated the professionalism of film criticism for co-constituting a cinematic world that involves a greater population of film viewers. On the other hand, opportunities to comment on and discuss films on these more democratic platforms without formal qualification (such as certification of the author’s accomplished status in traditional journalism) encourages younger generations to pursue their dreams of filmmaking, film criticism, and film scholarship, which could seem impossible to them. Hence, lapian prepares the greater number of cinephiles to be not only involved in the film world but also actively constituting it.","PeriodicalId":43535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Cinemas","volume":"15 1","pages":"139 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lapian (拉片): The disseminated professionalism and the co-constituted world\",\"authors\":\"Chaorong Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17508061.2021.1989842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Current Chinese cinephilia has developed an obsession with what is known as lapian, a practice that consists of scholarly or professional analysis of films and a fascination with cinematic details both textual and inter-textual. What can be discerned through such a phenomenon are not only Chinese film aficionados’ love for cinema and movie going, but also their aspiration to participate in and contribute to the nation’s emerging film culture. Having originated in classrooms at Beijing Film Academy around 1958, lapian has been disseminated to the country’s myriad of film communities; together with it, is the professionalism of engaging films. Enabled by fan-based platforms on the Internet (especially social networking sites such as Douban, Mtime, and Wechat public accounts), the tactile nature in lapian broke down the barrier between professional film critics (as well as scholars) and ordinary film lovers. On the one hand, the proliferation of lapian among common viewers produces a discourse that competes with professional criticisms in China. Unlike the implicit elitism that pervaded the pre-Internet world of cinephilia (as well as its lapian practices), current Chinese film communities have appropriated the professionalism of film criticism for co-constituting a cinematic world that involves a greater population of film viewers. On the other hand, opportunities to comment on and discuss films on these more democratic platforms without formal qualification (such as certification of the author’s accomplished status in traditional journalism) encourages younger generations to pursue their dreams of filmmaking, film criticism, and film scholarship, which could seem impossible to them. Hence, lapian prepares the greater number of cinephiles to be not only involved in the film world but also actively constituting it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Cinemas\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"139 - 147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Cinemas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508061.2021.1989842\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Cinemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508061.2021.1989842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前的中国影迷已经形成了一种被称为“lapian”的痴迷,这种行为包括对电影的学术或专业分析,以及对电影文本和文本间细节的迷恋。通过这种现象,我们不仅可以看出中国影迷对电影和观影的热爱,还可以看出他们渴望参与并为中国新兴的电影文化做出贡献。拉皮安1958年左右起源于北京电影学院的课堂,如今已传播到国内无数的电影社区;与之相伴的是引人入胜的电影的专业性。借助互联网上的粉丝平台(尤其是豆瓣、时光网、b微信公众号等社交网站),拉皮安的触觉特性打破了专业影评人(以及学者)与普通电影爱好者之间的隔阂。一方面,lapian在普通观众中的扩散产生了一种与中国专业批评相竞争的话语。不同于前互联网时代弥漫的隐性精英主义(以及它的lapian实践),当前的中国电影界已经利用电影评论的专业精神,共同构建了一个涉及更多电影观众的电影世界。另一方面,在这些更民主的平台上评论和讨论电影的机会,无需正式的资格认证(例如作者在传统新闻业的成就认证),鼓励了年轻一代追求他们的电影制作,电影评论和电影奖学金的梦想,这对他们来说似乎是不可能的。因此,lapian准备了更多的影迷,不仅参与电影世界,而且积极地构成它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lapian (拉片): The disseminated professionalism and the co-constituted world
Abstract Current Chinese cinephilia has developed an obsession with what is known as lapian, a practice that consists of scholarly or professional analysis of films and a fascination with cinematic details both textual and inter-textual. What can be discerned through such a phenomenon are not only Chinese film aficionados’ love for cinema and movie going, but also their aspiration to participate in and contribute to the nation’s emerging film culture. Having originated in classrooms at Beijing Film Academy around 1958, lapian has been disseminated to the country’s myriad of film communities; together with it, is the professionalism of engaging films. Enabled by fan-based platforms on the Internet (especially social networking sites such as Douban, Mtime, and Wechat public accounts), the tactile nature in lapian broke down the barrier between professional film critics (as well as scholars) and ordinary film lovers. On the one hand, the proliferation of lapian among common viewers produces a discourse that competes with professional criticisms in China. Unlike the implicit elitism that pervaded the pre-Internet world of cinephilia (as well as its lapian practices), current Chinese film communities have appropriated the professionalism of film criticism for co-constituting a cinematic world that involves a greater population of film viewers. On the other hand, opportunities to comment on and discuss films on these more democratic platforms without formal qualification (such as certification of the author’s accomplished status in traditional journalism) encourages younger generations to pursue their dreams of filmmaking, film criticism, and film scholarship, which could seem impossible to them. Hence, lapian prepares the greater number of cinephiles to be not only involved in the film world but also actively constituting it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chinese Cinemas
Journal of Chinese Cinemas FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信