非洲南部畜牧和农业出现的考古植物学证据

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
J. Olatoyan, F. Neumann, E. Orijemie, C. Sievers, M. Evans, Sinethemba Mvelase, Tanya Hatting, M. Schoeman
{"title":"非洲南部畜牧和农业出现的考古植物学证据","authors":"J. Olatoyan, F. Neumann, E. Orijemie, C. Sievers, M. Evans, Sinethemba Mvelase, Tanya Hatting, M. Schoeman","doi":"10.35535/acpa-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several models which remain equivocal and controversial cite migration and/or diffusion for the emergence and spread of pastoralism and farming in southern Africa during the first millennium AD. A synthesis of archaeobotanical proxies (e.g., palynology, phytoliths, anthracology) consistent with existing archaeobotanical and archaeological data leads to new insights into anthropogenic impacts in palaeorecords. Harnessing such archaeobotanical evidence is viable for tracing the spread of pastoralism and farming in the first millennium AD because the impact of anthropogenic practices is likely to result in distinct patterns of vegetation change. We assess this impact through the synthesis of published archaeobotanical evidence of pastoralism and farming, as well as vegetation changes in southern Africa during the first millennium AD. It has been argued that the decline of forests during the first millennium AD in southern Africa predominantly relates to climate change. This argument often precludes anthropogenic effects on vegetation. Our reassessment of the relationship between vegetation, climate, and human activities in southern Africa reveals evidence of human impact during the same period. We also highlight gaps in the current knowledge of early pastoralism and farming and potential future research directions. We hypothesize that the pattern exhibited by the decline of forest tree pollen, coupled with the increase of open-land indicators, the occurrence of pioneer trees, as well as the spores of coprophilous fungi, and possible changes in the fire regime are reflective of, and consistent with, anthropogenic activities of pre-European pastoralists and farmers.","PeriodicalId":39861,"journal":{"name":"Acta Palaeobotanica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Archaeobotanical evidence for the emergence of pastoralism and farming in southern Africa\",\"authors\":\"J. Olatoyan, F. Neumann, E. Orijemie, C. Sievers, M. Evans, Sinethemba Mvelase, Tanya Hatting, M. Schoeman\",\"doi\":\"10.35535/acpa-2022-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several models which remain equivocal and controversial cite migration and/or diffusion for the emergence and spread of pastoralism and farming in southern Africa during the first millennium AD. A synthesis of archaeobotanical proxies (e.g., palynology, phytoliths, anthracology) consistent with existing archaeobotanical and archaeological data leads to new insights into anthropogenic impacts in palaeorecords. Harnessing such archaeobotanical evidence is viable for tracing the spread of pastoralism and farming in the first millennium AD because the impact of anthropogenic practices is likely to result in distinct patterns of vegetation change. We assess this impact through the synthesis of published archaeobotanical evidence of pastoralism and farming, as well as vegetation changes in southern Africa during the first millennium AD. It has been argued that the decline of forests during the first millennium AD in southern Africa predominantly relates to climate change. This argument often precludes anthropogenic effects on vegetation. Our reassessment of the relationship between vegetation, climate, and human activities in southern Africa reveals evidence of human impact during the same period. We also highlight gaps in the current knowledge of early pastoralism and farming and potential future research directions. We hypothesize that the pattern exhibited by the decline of forest tree pollen, coupled with the increase of open-land indicators, the occurrence of pioneer trees, as well as the spores of coprophilous fungi, and possible changes in the fire regime are reflective of, and consistent with, anthropogenic activities of pre-European pastoralists and farmers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Palaeobotanica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Palaeobotanica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35535/acpa-2022-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Palaeobotanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35535/acpa-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

一些仍然模棱两可和有争议的模型引用了公元第一个千年期间非洲南部畜牧和农业出现和传播的迁移和/或扩散。综合与现有考古植物和考古数据相一致的考古植物代用物(如孢粉学、植物岩学、人类学),可以使我们对古记录中的人为影响有新的认识。利用这些考古植物学证据来追踪公元第一个千年的畜牧业和农业的传播是可行的,因为人为活动的影响很可能导致不同的植被变化模式。我们通过综合已发表的关于畜牧和农业的考古植物学证据,以及公元第一个千年期间南部非洲的植被变化,来评估这种影响。有人认为,公元第一个千年期间南部非洲森林的减少主要与气候变化有关。这一论点往往排除了人为对植被的影响。我们对南部非洲植被、气候和人类活动之间关系的重新评估揭示了同一时期人类影响的证据。我们还强调了目前对早期畜牧业和农业知识的差距以及未来潜在的研究方向。我们假设,森林树木花粉的减少,加上开放土地指标的增加,先驱树和粪亲真菌孢子的出现,以及火灾状态的可能变化所表现出的模式反映了前欧洲牧民和农民的人类活动,并与之一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Archaeobotanical evidence for the emergence of pastoralism and farming in southern Africa
Several models which remain equivocal and controversial cite migration and/or diffusion for the emergence and spread of pastoralism and farming in southern Africa during the first millennium AD. A synthesis of archaeobotanical proxies (e.g., palynology, phytoliths, anthracology) consistent with existing archaeobotanical and archaeological data leads to new insights into anthropogenic impacts in palaeorecords. Harnessing such archaeobotanical evidence is viable for tracing the spread of pastoralism and farming in the first millennium AD because the impact of anthropogenic practices is likely to result in distinct patterns of vegetation change. We assess this impact through the synthesis of published archaeobotanical evidence of pastoralism and farming, as well as vegetation changes in southern Africa during the first millennium AD. It has been argued that the decline of forests during the first millennium AD in southern Africa predominantly relates to climate change. This argument often precludes anthropogenic effects on vegetation. Our reassessment of the relationship between vegetation, climate, and human activities in southern Africa reveals evidence of human impact during the same period. We also highlight gaps in the current knowledge of early pastoralism and farming and potential future research directions. We hypothesize that the pattern exhibited by the decline of forest tree pollen, coupled with the increase of open-land indicators, the occurrence of pioneer trees, as well as the spores of coprophilous fungi, and possible changes in the fire regime are reflective of, and consistent with, anthropogenic activities of pre-European pastoralists and farmers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Palaeobotanica
Acta Palaeobotanica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Palaeobotanica is an international journal edited in English by the W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, since 1960, which publishes original palaeobotanical, palynological, palaeoecological and palaeophytogeographical papers, monographs, review and discussion articles and book reviews. It is the only journal in the Central and Eastern Europe publishing papers from all fields of palaeobotany. The journal is published regularly in one volume per year, with two numbers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信