民主对话与发展:Björn古斯塔夫森的知识分子讣告

Q3 Social Sciences
R. Ennals
{"title":"民主对话与发展:Björn古斯塔夫森的知识分子讣告","authors":"R. Ennals","doi":"10.46364/EJWI.V4I1.498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Björn Gustavsen, with an original professional background as a lawyer and judge in his native Norway, had a formative role in organisational development processes in Norway, Sweden, Scandinavia and the European Union over four decades. Following in the tradition of Norwegian working life research by Trist and Thorsrud, he provided the conceptual framework and practical case studies which have driven major national and international programmes. He learned from different experience of organisational change in, for example, the USA and Japan, but he identified a distinctive way forward for the European Union, where he acted as a senior adviser. In contrast to conventional Taylorist top-down management and reliance on expert consultants, his approach was bottom up and concept driven, with a focus on empowering workers. With a commitment to long-term sustainable processes, he emphasised the importance of capacity building and succession planning, highlighting development organisations. His approach to partnership and coalition building enabled collaboration across sectors, in the cause of creating collaborative advantage. He had a distinctive fluent academic writing style, but spentmost of his time engaged in the design and practice of development, and editing the work of younger colleagues. He saw the role of academic journals and edited books in the development process, so encouraged new publications, but without seeking to dominate. He took ideas of Action Research and case studies, and applied them to national enterprise development programmes, working with the labour market parties. This resulted in a distinctive research and development culture.","PeriodicalId":39289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Action Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democratic Dialogue and Development: An Intellectual Obituary of Björn Gustavsen\",\"authors\":\"R. Ennals\",\"doi\":\"10.46364/EJWI.V4I1.498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Björn Gustavsen, with an original professional background as a lawyer and judge in his native Norway, had a formative role in organisational development processes in Norway, Sweden, Scandinavia and the European Union over four decades. Following in the tradition of Norwegian working life research by Trist and Thorsrud, he provided the conceptual framework and practical case studies which have driven major national and international programmes. He learned from different experience of organisational change in, for example, the USA and Japan, but he identified a distinctive way forward for the European Union, where he acted as a senior adviser. In contrast to conventional Taylorist top-down management and reliance on expert consultants, his approach was bottom up and concept driven, with a focus on empowering workers. With a commitment to long-term sustainable processes, he emphasised the importance of capacity building and succession planning, highlighting development organisations. His approach to partnership and coalition building enabled collaboration across sectors, in the cause of creating collaborative advantage. He had a distinctive fluent academic writing style, but spentmost of his time engaged in the design and practice of development, and editing the work of younger colleagues. He saw the role of academic journals and edited books in the development process, so encouraged new publications, but without seeking to dominate. He took ideas of Action Research and case studies, and applied them to national enterprise development programmes, working with the labour market parties. This resulted in a distinctive research and development culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Action Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Action Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46364/EJWI.V4I1.498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46364/EJWI.V4I1.498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

比约恩·古斯塔夫森(Björn Gustavsen)在他的祖国挪威拥有律师和法官的原始专业背景,40多年来,他在挪威、瑞典、斯堪的纳维亚和欧盟的组织发展过程中发挥了重要作用。按照Trist和Thorsrud的挪威工作生活研究传统,他提供了概念框架和实际案例研究,推动了重大的国家和国际计划。他从美国和日本不同的组织变革经验中吸取了教训,但他为欧盟确定了一条独特的前进道路,并担任欧盟的高级顾问。与传统的Taylorist自上而下的管理和对专家顾问的依赖不同,他的方法是自下而上的,以概念为驱动,重点是赋予工人权力。在致力于长期可持续进程的同时,他强调了能力建设和继任规划的重要性,并强调了发展组织。他建立伙伴关系和联盟的方法实现了跨部门的合作,从而创造了合作优势。他有着独特流畅的学术写作风格,但大部分时间都在从事开发的设计和实践,以及编辑年轻同事的作品。他看到了学术期刊和编辑书籍在发展过程中的作用,因此鼓励出版新的出版物,但并不寻求主导地位。他采纳了行动研究和案例研究的想法,并将其应用于国家企业发展方案,与劳动力市场各方合作。这形成了一种独特的研发文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Democratic Dialogue and Development: An Intellectual Obituary of Björn Gustavsen
Björn Gustavsen, with an original professional background as a lawyer and judge in his native Norway, had a formative role in organisational development processes in Norway, Sweden, Scandinavia and the European Union over four decades. Following in the tradition of Norwegian working life research by Trist and Thorsrud, he provided the conceptual framework and practical case studies which have driven major national and international programmes. He learned from different experience of organisational change in, for example, the USA and Japan, but he identified a distinctive way forward for the European Union, where he acted as a senior adviser. In contrast to conventional Taylorist top-down management and reliance on expert consultants, his approach was bottom up and concept driven, with a focus on empowering workers. With a commitment to long-term sustainable processes, he emphasised the importance of capacity building and succession planning, highlighting development organisations. His approach to partnership and coalition building enabled collaboration across sectors, in the cause of creating collaborative advantage. He had a distinctive fluent academic writing style, but spentmost of his time engaged in the design and practice of development, and editing the work of younger colleagues. He saw the role of academic journals and edited books in the development process, so encouraged new publications, but without seeking to dominate. He took ideas of Action Research and case studies, and applied them to national enterprise development programmes, working with the labour market parties. This resulted in a distinctive research and development culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Action Research
International Journal of Action Research Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信