关节镜下胫骨髁间骨折的空心螺钉固定与高强度缝合固定

Q4 Medicine
Zhiyi Yu
{"title":"关节镜下胫骨髁间骨折的空心螺钉固定与高强度缝合固定","authors":"Zhiyi Yu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2020.02.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the cannulated screw fixation versus high-strength suture fixation in arthroscopy of tibial intercondylar fracture. \n \n \nMethods \nA retrospective analysis was performed of the 31 patients with tibial intercondylar fracture who had been treated from February 2015 to February 2018 at Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Renhe Hospital. They were 18 males and 13 females with an average age of 34.3 years (range, from 21 to 51 years). Arthroscopic cannulated screw fixation was conducted in 13 patients (screwing group), 5 of whom were McKeever type Ⅱ and 8 of whom McKeever type Ⅲ. Arthroscopic high-intensity suture fixation was used in 18 patients (suture group), 6 of whom were McKeever type Ⅱ and 12 of whom McKeever type Ⅲ. The 2 groups were compared postoperatively in terms of operation time, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, Lysholm knee scores and rate of secondary operation. \n \n \nResults \nThe 2 groups were comparable because there were no significant differences in preoperative general data between them (P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for 12 to 44 months (mean, 24.8 months). For the screwing and suture groups, respectively, operation time was 91.6 min±7.6 min and 91.9 min±7.4 min, hospitalization time 11.5 d±2.9 d and 11.4 d±2.3 d and fracture healing time 3.3 mon±0.5 mon and 3.3 mon±0.6 mon, showing no significant differences between the 2 groups (P>0.05). By the Lysholm scores at 12 months after operation, the screwing group scored from 65 to100 points with an excellent and good rate of 92.3% (12/13), and the suture group from 60 to 100 points with an excellent and good rate of 94.4% (17/18), showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Ten patients (76.9%) in the screwing group had secondary arthroscopy to remove the implants but none in the suture group did. \n \n \nConclusions \nBoth cannulated screw fixation and high-strength suture fixation can achieve satisfactory clinical results in the arthroscopy of tibial intercondylar fractures, but the latter may lead to a lower rate of secondary operation. \n \n \nKey words: \nArthroscopy; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone nails; High strength suture; Tibial eminence fracture","PeriodicalId":10145,"journal":{"name":"中华创伤骨科杂志","volume":"22 1","pages":"166-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannulated screw fixation versus high-strength suture fixation in arthroscopy of tibial intercondylar fracture\",\"authors\":\"Zhiyi Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2020.02.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the cannulated screw fixation versus high-strength suture fixation in arthroscopy of tibial intercondylar fracture. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA retrospective analysis was performed of the 31 patients with tibial intercondylar fracture who had been treated from February 2015 to February 2018 at Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Renhe Hospital. They were 18 males and 13 females with an average age of 34.3 years (range, from 21 to 51 years). Arthroscopic cannulated screw fixation was conducted in 13 patients (screwing group), 5 of whom were McKeever type Ⅱ and 8 of whom McKeever type Ⅲ. Arthroscopic high-intensity suture fixation was used in 18 patients (suture group), 6 of whom were McKeever type Ⅱ and 12 of whom McKeever type Ⅲ. The 2 groups were compared postoperatively in terms of operation time, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, Lysholm knee scores and rate of secondary operation. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe 2 groups were comparable because there were no significant differences in preoperative general data between them (P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for 12 to 44 months (mean, 24.8 months). For the screwing and suture groups, respectively, operation time was 91.6 min±7.6 min and 91.9 min±7.4 min, hospitalization time 11.5 d±2.9 d and 11.4 d±2.3 d and fracture healing time 3.3 mon±0.5 mon and 3.3 mon±0.6 mon, showing no significant differences between the 2 groups (P>0.05). By the Lysholm scores at 12 months after operation, the screwing group scored from 65 to100 points with an excellent and good rate of 92.3% (12/13), and the suture group from 60 to 100 points with an excellent and good rate of 94.4% (17/18), showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Ten patients (76.9%) in the screwing group had secondary arthroscopy to remove the implants but none in the suture group did. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nBoth cannulated screw fixation and high-strength suture fixation can achieve satisfactory clinical results in the arthroscopy of tibial intercondylar fractures, but the latter may lead to a lower rate of secondary operation. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nArthroscopy; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone nails; High strength suture; Tibial eminence fracture\",\"PeriodicalId\":10145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"166-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2020.02.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华创伤骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2020.02.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较胫骨髁间骨折关节镜下空心螺钉与高强度缝合固定的疗效。方法对2015年2月至2018年2月北京人和医院骨科收治的31例胫骨髁间骨折患者进行回顾性分析。男性18例,女性13例,平均年龄34.3岁(21 ~ 51岁)。采用关节镜下空心螺钉固定13例(螺钉组),其中5例为McKeever型Ⅱ,8例为McKeever型Ⅲ。采用关节镜下高强度缝合固定18例(缝合组),其中6例为McKeever型Ⅱ,12例为McKeever型Ⅲ。比较两组患者术后手术时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、Lysholm膝关节评分及二次手术率。结果两组术前一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05),具有可比性。随访12 ~ 44个月,平均24.8个月。螺钉组和缝合组手术时间分别为91.6 min±7.6 min和91.9 min±7.4 min,住院时间分别为11.5 d±2.9 d和11.4 d±2.3 d,骨折愈合时间分别为3.3个月±0.5个月和3.3个月±0.6个月,两组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后12个月Lysholm评分,螺钉组65 ~ 100分优良率为92.3%(12/13),缝合组60 ~ 100分优良率为94.4%(17/18),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。螺钉组有10例(76.9%)患者行二次关节镜取出假体,而缝合组无一例。结论在关节镜下治疗胫骨髁间骨折时,空心螺钉固定和高强度缝合固定均可获得满意的临床效果,但后者可能导致较低的二次手术率。关键词:关节镜;骨折内固定;骨钉;高强度缝合;胫骨隆起骨折
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cannulated screw fixation versus high-strength suture fixation in arthroscopy of tibial intercondylar fracture
Objective To compare the cannulated screw fixation versus high-strength suture fixation in arthroscopy of tibial intercondylar fracture. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of the 31 patients with tibial intercondylar fracture who had been treated from February 2015 to February 2018 at Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Renhe Hospital. They were 18 males and 13 females with an average age of 34.3 years (range, from 21 to 51 years). Arthroscopic cannulated screw fixation was conducted in 13 patients (screwing group), 5 of whom were McKeever type Ⅱ and 8 of whom McKeever type Ⅲ. Arthroscopic high-intensity suture fixation was used in 18 patients (suture group), 6 of whom were McKeever type Ⅱ and 12 of whom McKeever type Ⅲ. The 2 groups were compared postoperatively in terms of operation time, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, Lysholm knee scores and rate of secondary operation. Results The 2 groups were comparable because there were no significant differences in preoperative general data between them (P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for 12 to 44 months (mean, 24.8 months). For the screwing and suture groups, respectively, operation time was 91.6 min±7.6 min and 91.9 min±7.4 min, hospitalization time 11.5 d±2.9 d and 11.4 d±2.3 d and fracture healing time 3.3 mon±0.5 mon and 3.3 mon±0.6 mon, showing no significant differences between the 2 groups (P>0.05). By the Lysholm scores at 12 months after operation, the screwing group scored from 65 to100 points with an excellent and good rate of 92.3% (12/13), and the suture group from 60 to 100 points with an excellent and good rate of 94.4% (17/18), showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Ten patients (76.9%) in the screwing group had secondary arthroscopy to remove the implants but none in the suture group did. Conclusions Both cannulated screw fixation and high-strength suture fixation can achieve satisfactory clinical results in the arthroscopy of tibial intercondylar fractures, but the latter may lead to a lower rate of secondary operation. Key words: Arthroscopy; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone nails; High strength suture; Tibial eminence fracture
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7288
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信