纪念霍德森的马:纪念和1857-58年印度起义

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
J. Cheshire
{"title":"纪念霍德森的马:纪念和1857-58年印度起义","authors":"J. Cheshire","doi":"10.1093/jvcult/vcac068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article presents analysis of the memorial to William Hodson in Lichfield Cathedral, designed by George Edmund Street between 1859 and 1862, focusing on the iconography of the monument and way that it was influenced by Muscular Christianity and ecclesiology. The attitude of Hodson and his brother George Hodson, who commissioned the monument, is examined through analysis of the publication that presented Hodson’s career to the Victorian public: Twelve Years of a Soldier’s Life in India (1859). The memorial raises urgent questions about the future of Victorian cultural heritage as it demonstrably misrepresents a highly symbolic event within British imperial history. Hodson was represented as a hero by Victorian ecclesiologists but is now seen by many as an unscrupulous and ruthless imperialist. This paper will demonstrate that the extraordinary form of the tomb was determined by an alteration to the design: the inclusion of a sculptural panel representing the ‘Surrender of the King of Delhi’. This change was instigated by the committee of the Ecclesiological Society headed by A. J. Beresford Hope. The panel turns a relatively peripheral event into a symbolic tableau: the surrender of Indian Islam to British Christianity, a distortion typical of British culture in the aftermath of the Indian Uprising of 1857–1858. The historiography of Hodson’s career shows that the tomb has acted as a focus for those wishing to perpetuate a conservative interpretation of Hodson’s career.","PeriodicalId":43921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Victorian Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remembering Hodson’s Horse: Commemoration and the Indian Uprising of 1857–58\",\"authors\":\"J. Cheshire\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jvcult/vcac068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article presents analysis of the memorial to William Hodson in Lichfield Cathedral, designed by George Edmund Street between 1859 and 1862, focusing on the iconography of the monument and way that it was influenced by Muscular Christianity and ecclesiology. The attitude of Hodson and his brother George Hodson, who commissioned the monument, is examined through analysis of the publication that presented Hodson’s career to the Victorian public: Twelve Years of a Soldier’s Life in India (1859). The memorial raises urgent questions about the future of Victorian cultural heritage as it demonstrably misrepresents a highly symbolic event within British imperial history. Hodson was represented as a hero by Victorian ecclesiologists but is now seen by many as an unscrupulous and ruthless imperialist. This paper will demonstrate that the extraordinary form of the tomb was determined by an alteration to the design: the inclusion of a sculptural panel representing the ‘Surrender of the King of Delhi’. This change was instigated by the committee of the Ecclesiological Society headed by A. J. Beresford Hope. The panel turns a relatively peripheral event into a symbolic tableau: the surrender of Indian Islam to British Christianity, a distortion typical of British culture in the aftermath of the Indian Uprising of 1857–1858. The historiography of Hodson’s career shows that the tomb has acted as a focus for those wishing to perpetuate a conservative interpretation of Hodson’s career.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Victorian Culture\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Victorian Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jvcult/vcac068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Victorian Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jvcult/vcac068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了1859年至1862年间由乔治·埃德蒙·斯特里特设计的利奇菲尔德大教堂的威廉·霍德森纪念碑,重点介绍了纪念碑的图像学以及它受到肌肉基督教和教会学的影响。霍德森和他委托建造这座纪念碑的兄弟乔治·霍德森的态度,是通过分析向维多利亚时代公众介绍霍德森职业生涯的出版物《印度士兵生活的十二年》(1859年)来检验的。这座纪念碑对维多利亚文化遗产的未来提出了紧迫的问题,因为它显然歪曲了英国帝国历史上一个极具象征意义的事件。霍德森曾被维多利亚时代的教会学家视为英雄,但现在被许多人视为肆无忌惮、冷酷无情的帝国主义者。这篇论文将证明,陵墓的非凡形式是由对设计的修改决定的:包括一块代表“德里国王投降”的雕塑面板。这一变化是由A·J·贝雷斯福德·霍普领导的教会学会委员会发起的。该小组将一个相对次要的事件变成了一个象征性的画面:印度伊斯兰教向英国基督教投降,这是1857-1858年印度起义后英国文化的典型扭曲。对霍德森职业生涯的史学研究表明,对于那些希望对霍德森的职业生涯进行保守解读的人来说,这座坟墓是一个焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remembering Hodson’s Horse: Commemoration and the Indian Uprising of 1857–58
This article presents analysis of the memorial to William Hodson in Lichfield Cathedral, designed by George Edmund Street between 1859 and 1862, focusing on the iconography of the monument and way that it was influenced by Muscular Christianity and ecclesiology. The attitude of Hodson and his brother George Hodson, who commissioned the monument, is examined through analysis of the publication that presented Hodson’s career to the Victorian public: Twelve Years of a Soldier’s Life in India (1859). The memorial raises urgent questions about the future of Victorian cultural heritage as it demonstrably misrepresents a highly symbolic event within British imperial history. Hodson was represented as a hero by Victorian ecclesiologists but is now seen by many as an unscrupulous and ruthless imperialist. This paper will demonstrate that the extraordinary form of the tomb was determined by an alteration to the design: the inclusion of a sculptural panel representing the ‘Surrender of the King of Delhi’. This change was instigated by the committee of the Ecclesiological Society headed by A. J. Beresford Hope. The panel turns a relatively peripheral event into a symbolic tableau: the surrender of Indian Islam to British Christianity, a distortion typical of British culture in the aftermath of the Indian Uprising of 1857–1858. The historiography of Hodson’s career shows that the tomb has acted as a focus for those wishing to perpetuate a conservative interpretation of Hodson’s career.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信