早期曼达语中的新曼达语。第二部分:文本、翻译和结论

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION

Aramaic Studies Pub Date : 2019-05-24 DOI:10.1163/17455227-01602004

M. Morgenstern

{"title":"早期曼达语中的新曼达语。第二部分:文本、翻译和结论","authors":"M. Morgenstern","doi":"10.1163/17455227-01602004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The first part of this article examined the features that distinguish the language of the earliest Mandaean colophons from Classical Mandaic and demonstrated that many of these features are shared with the contemporary Neo-Mandaic dialects recorded in the research literature since the 20th century. Part 2 presents editions and translations of the source texts with some brief philological notes and seeks to identify the origins of the linguistic innovations.","PeriodicalId":41594,"journal":{"name":"Aramaic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/17455227-01602004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neo-Mandaic in Early Mandaean Colophons. Part 2: Texts, Translations and Conclusion\",\"authors\":\"M. Morgenstern\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/17455227-01602004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The first part of this article examined the features that distinguish the language of the earliest Mandaean colophons from Classical Mandaic and demonstrated that many of these features are shared with the contemporary Neo-Mandaic dialects recorded in the research literature since the 20th century. Part 2 presents editions and translations of the source texts with some brief philological notes and seeks to identify the origins of the linguistic innovations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aramaic Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/17455227-01602004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aramaic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/17455227-01602004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aramaic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/17455227-01602004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的第一部分考察了最早的曼达语长音与古典曼达语的区别特征，并证明其中许多特征与20世纪以来研究文献中记录的当代新曼达语方言是相同的。第二部分介绍了源文本的版本和翻译，并提供了一些简短的文献学注释，试图确定语言创新的起源。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Neo-Mandaic in Early Mandaean Colophons. Part 2: Texts, Translations and Conclusion

The first part of this article examined the features that distinguish the language of the earliest Mandaean colophons from Classical Mandaic and demonstrated that many of these features are shared with the contemporary Neo-Mandaic dialects recorded in the research literature since the 20th century. Part 2 presents editions and translations of the source texts with some brief philological notes and seeks to identify the origins of the linguistic innovations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Aramaic Studies RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal brings all aspects of the various forms of Aramaic and their literatures together to help shape the field of Aramaic Studies. The journal, which has been the main platform for Targum and Peshitta Studies for some time, is now also the main outlet for the study of all Aramaic dialects, including the language and literatures of Old Aramaic, Achaemenid Aramaic, Palmyrene, Nabataean, Qumran Aramaic, Mandaic, Syriac, Rabbinic Aramaic, and Neo-Aramaic. Aramaic Studies seeks contributions of a linguistic, literary, exegetical or theological nature for any of the dialects and periods involved, from detailed grammatical work to narrative analysis, from short notes to fundamental research. Reviews, seminars, conference proceedings, and bibliographical surveys are also featured.