{"title":"miss - tlif治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄时两条通道的比较研究","authors":"Shixue Li, Wei Zhang, Yapeng Sun, Fei Zhang, Haofei Cui, Yuan Gao, Liao Jiaqi, Zeyang Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2019.20.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the clinical effects between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) assisted by Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) and Quadrant for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). \n \n \nMethods \nAll of 59 patients suffered from DLSS treated surgically from May 2015 to October 2017 were reviewed. According to the surgery method, all cases were divided into MED group (27 cases) and Quadrant channel group (32 cases). All patients were followed up for an average of 18.5 months (11-29 months). Comparison was made on the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative time in bed, postoperative creatine kinase (CK), fusion rate and the degree of muscle fibrosis shown in MRI, as well as visual analogue scale (VAS)score and Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) score in two groups. \n \n \nResults \nThe duration of operation in MED group was significantly longer than that in Quadrant group (161.7±22.4 min vs. 145.6±19.4 min, t=4.541, P 0.05). ODI was lower in MED group than that in Quadrant group after 6 months and 12 months.The fusion rate was88.9%(24/27) in MED group and 93.8%(30/32) in Quadrant channel group. There was no statistical difference in fusion rate of two groups. 10 patients in MED group and 12 patients in Quadrant group underwent MRI examination of lumbar spine one year after operation. The ratio of postoperative and preoperative atrophy of multiplex muscle area was measured. Muscle atrophy of lower back muscle was lighter in MED group (0.12±0.05 vs. 0.22±0.04, t=-2.428, P<0.05). For intraoperative and postoperative complications, 1 case of dural sac rupture occurred in both groups. Gelatin sponge immediately with fibrin glue was used for plugging up, no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage was found. In Quadrant channel group, 1 case had less blood supply of skin incision edges and epidermal necrosis while the other case had fat liquefaction. \n \n \nConclusion \nCompared with the aid of Quadrant, MIS-TLIF assisted with MED had less blood loss, less trauma and faster recovery and could reduce the incidence of postoperative incision complication. \n \n \nKey words: \nLumbar vertebrae; Intervertebral disc degeneration; Spinal Stenosis; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive; Spinal fusion","PeriodicalId":36405,"journal":{"name":"中华骨科杂志","volume":"39 1","pages":"1275-1284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison study of two channels during MIS-TLIF in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment\",\"authors\":\"Shixue Li, Wei Zhang, Yapeng Sun, Fei Zhang, Haofei Cui, Yuan Gao, Liao Jiaqi, Zeyang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2019.20.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the clinical effects between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) assisted by Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) and Quadrant for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nAll of 59 patients suffered from DLSS treated surgically from May 2015 to October 2017 were reviewed. According to the surgery method, all cases were divided into MED group (27 cases) and Quadrant channel group (32 cases). All patients were followed up for an average of 18.5 months (11-29 months). Comparison was made on the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative time in bed, postoperative creatine kinase (CK), fusion rate and the degree of muscle fibrosis shown in MRI, as well as visual analogue scale (VAS)score and Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) score in two groups. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe duration of operation in MED group was significantly longer than that in Quadrant group (161.7±22.4 min vs. 145.6±19.4 min, t=4.541, P 0.05). ODI was lower in MED group than that in Quadrant group after 6 months and 12 months.The fusion rate was88.9%(24/27) in MED group and 93.8%(30/32) in Quadrant channel group. There was no statistical difference in fusion rate of two groups. 10 patients in MED group and 12 patients in Quadrant group underwent MRI examination of lumbar spine one year after operation. The ratio of postoperative and preoperative atrophy of multiplex muscle area was measured. Muscle atrophy of lower back muscle was lighter in MED group (0.12±0.05 vs. 0.22±0.04, t=-2.428, P<0.05). For intraoperative and postoperative complications, 1 case of dural sac rupture occurred in both groups. Gelatin sponge immediately with fibrin glue was used for plugging up, no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage was found. In Quadrant channel group, 1 case had less blood supply of skin incision edges and epidermal necrosis while the other case had fat liquefaction. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nCompared with the aid of Quadrant, MIS-TLIF assisted with MED had less blood loss, less trauma and faster recovery and could reduce the incidence of postoperative incision complication. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nLumbar vertebrae; Intervertebral disc degeneration; Spinal Stenosis; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive; Spinal fusion\",\"PeriodicalId\":36405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华骨科杂志\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"1275-1284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华骨科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2019.20.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2019.20.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的比较微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)联合显微内镜椎间盘切除术(MED)与象限手术(Quadrant)治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)的临床疗效。方法回顾2015年5月至2017年10月手术治疗的59例DLSS患者。根据手术方式将所有病例分为MED组(27例)和象限通道组(32例)。随访11 ~ 29个月,平均18.5个月。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流、术后卧床时间、术后肌酸激酶(CK)、融合率、肌肉纤维化程度,以及视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分。结果MED组手术时间明显长于象限组(161.7±22.4 min∶145.6±19.4 min, t=4.541, P < 0.05)。6个月和12个月时,MED组ODI低于象限组。MED组融合率为88.9%(24/27),象限通道组为93.8%(30/32)。两组融合率比较,差异无统计学意义。MED组10例,象限组12例,术后1年行腰椎MRI检查。测量术后与术前复合肌面积萎缩比例。MED组下背部肌肉萎缩较轻(0.12±0.05∶0.22±0.04,t=-2.428, P<0.05)。术中术后并发症两组均发生硬膜囊破裂1例。立即用明胶海绵加纤维蛋白胶封堵,术后未见脑脊液漏。象限通道组1例皮肤切口边缘血供少,表皮坏死,1例脂肪液化。结论与Quadrant辅助相比,MIS-TLIF辅助MED出血量少,创伤小,恢复快,可减少术后切口并发症的发生率。关键词:腰椎;椎间盘退变;脊髓狭窄;外科手术,微创;脊柱融合术
A comparison study of two channels during MIS-TLIF in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment
Objective
To compare the clinical effects between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) assisted by Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) and Quadrant for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).
Methods
All of 59 patients suffered from DLSS treated surgically from May 2015 to October 2017 were reviewed. According to the surgery method, all cases were divided into MED group (27 cases) and Quadrant channel group (32 cases). All patients were followed up for an average of 18.5 months (11-29 months). Comparison was made on the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative time in bed, postoperative creatine kinase (CK), fusion rate and the degree of muscle fibrosis shown in MRI, as well as visual analogue scale (VAS)score and Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) score in two groups.
Results
The duration of operation in MED group was significantly longer than that in Quadrant group (161.7±22.4 min vs. 145.6±19.4 min, t=4.541, P 0.05). ODI was lower in MED group than that in Quadrant group after 6 months and 12 months.The fusion rate was88.9%(24/27) in MED group and 93.8%(30/32) in Quadrant channel group. There was no statistical difference in fusion rate of two groups. 10 patients in MED group and 12 patients in Quadrant group underwent MRI examination of lumbar spine one year after operation. The ratio of postoperative and preoperative atrophy of multiplex muscle area was measured. Muscle atrophy of lower back muscle was lighter in MED group (0.12±0.05 vs. 0.22±0.04, t=-2.428, P<0.05). For intraoperative and postoperative complications, 1 case of dural sac rupture occurred in both groups. Gelatin sponge immediately with fibrin glue was used for plugging up, no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage was found. In Quadrant channel group, 1 case had less blood supply of skin incision edges and epidermal necrosis while the other case had fat liquefaction.
Conclusion
Compared with the aid of Quadrant, MIS-TLIF assisted with MED had less blood loss, less trauma and faster recovery and could reduce the incidence of postoperative incision complication.
Key words:
Lumbar vertebrae; Intervertebral disc degeneration; Spinal Stenosis; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive; Spinal fusion