可重复的研究出版工作流程:一个规范的工作流程框架和公平的数字对象方法的质量研究成果

IF 1.3 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Limor Peer, Claudia Biniossek, Dirk Betz, Thu-Mai Christian
{"title":"可重复的研究出版工作流程:一个规范的工作流程框架和公平的数字对象方法的质量研究成果","authors":"Limor Peer, Claudia Biniossek, Dirk Betz, Thu-Mai Christian","doi":"10.1162/dint_a_00133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper we present the Reproducible Research Publication Workflow (RRPW) as an example of how generic canonical workflows can be applied to a specific context. The RRPW includes essential steps between submission and final publication of the manuscript and the research artefacts (i.e., data, code, etc.) that underlie the scholarly claims in the manuscript. A key aspect of the RRPW is the inclusion of artefact review and metadata creation as part of the publication workflow. The paper discusses a formalized technical structure around a set of canonical steps which helps codify and standardize the process for researchers, curators, and publishers. The proposed application of canonical workflows can help achieve the goals of improved transparency and reproducibility, increase FAIR compliance of all research artefacts at all steps, and facilitate better exchange of annotated and machine-readable metadata.","PeriodicalId":34023,"journal":{"name":"Data Intelligence","volume":"4 1","pages":"306-319"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducible Research Publication Workflow: A Canonical Workflow Framework and FAIR Digital Object Approach to Quality Research Output\",\"authors\":\"Limor Peer, Claudia Biniossek, Dirk Betz, Thu-Mai Christian\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/dint_a_00133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this paper we present the Reproducible Research Publication Workflow (RRPW) as an example of how generic canonical workflows can be applied to a specific context. The RRPW includes essential steps between submission and final publication of the manuscript and the research artefacts (i.e., data, code, etc.) that underlie the scholarly claims in the manuscript. A key aspect of the RRPW is the inclusion of artefact review and metadata creation as part of the publication workflow. The paper discusses a formalized technical structure around a set of canonical steps which helps codify and standardize the process for researchers, curators, and publishers. The proposed application of canonical workflows can help achieve the goals of improved transparency and reproducibility, increase FAIR compliance of all research artefacts at all steps, and facilitate better exchange of annotated and machine-readable metadata.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"306-319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00133\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了可重复的研究出版工作流(RRPW)作为一个例子,如何将通用的规范工作流应用于特定的上下文中。RRPW包括从提交到最终出版的手稿和研究工件(即数据、代码等)之间的基本步骤,这些都是手稿中学术主张的基础。RRPW的一个关键方面是将工件审查和元数据创建作为发布工作流的一部分。本文讨论了围绕一组规范步骤的形式化技术结构,这些步骤有助于编纂和标准化研究人员,策展人和出版商的过程。规范化工作流程的建议应用可以帮助实现提高透明度和可重复性的目标,在所有步骤中增加所有研究工件的FAIR合规性,并促进更好地交换注释和机器可读的元数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reproducible Research Publication Workflow: A Canonical Workflow Framework and FAIR Digital Object Approach to Quality Research Output
Abstract In this paper we present the Reproducible Research Publication Workflow (RRPW) as an example of how generic canonical workflows can be applied to a specific context. The RRPW includes essential steps between submission and final publication of the manuscript and the research artefacts (i.e., data, code, etc.) that underlie the scholarly claims in the manuscript. A key aspect of the RRPW is the inclusion of artefact review and metadata creation as part of the publication workflow. The paper discusses a formalized technical structure around a set of canonical steps which helps codify and standardize the process for researchers, curators, and publishers. The proposed application of canonical workflows can help achieve the goals of improved transparency and reproducibility, increase FAIR compliance of all research artefacts at all steps, and facilitate better exchange of annotated and machine-readable metadata.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Data Intelligence
Data Intelligence COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信