在长骨开放性骨折中,使用0.9%氯化钠与使用0.1%和0.1%甜菜碱活性成分的伤口冲洗相比减少细菌定植伤口冲洗的差异

I. Nyoman, Yuda Raditya, K. G. M. Ridia, I. W. Aryana, Ni Nengah, Dwi Fatmawati, I. Suyasa, Ksenija Bogoeva-Kostovska
{"title":"在长骨开放性骨折中,使用0.9%氯化钠与使用0.1%和0.1%甜菜碱活性成分的伤口冲洗相比减少细菌定植伤口冲洗的差异","authors":"I. Nyoman, Yuda Raditya, K. G. M. Ridia, I. W. Aryana, Ni Nengah, Dwi Fatmawati, I. Suyasa, Ksenija Bogoeva-Kostovska","doi":"10.3889/oamjms.2023.11599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: An open fracture is an emergency case that must be treated quickly to prevent infection. The use of an irrigation solution containing 0.1% of the antimicrobial polyhexanide and 0.1% of the surfactant betaine has been associated with more satisfactory wound healing.\nAIM: This study was comparing irrigation with polyhexanide 0.1% and betaine 0.1% (P + B) in reducing bacterial colonization of open fractures compared to using 0.9% natrium chloride (NaCl) solution.\nMETHODS: This study uses a pre- and post-control group design. Sampling was carried out in the operation room of the emergency care installation, inpatient installation, and outpatient installation of prof. Hospital. Dr. I.G.N.G Ngoerah Denpasar, between September and  November  2022. From a sample population suffering from open fractures of the lower extremities, samples of patients were taken who were irrigated with 0.9% NaCl solution with a mixture of polyhexanide 0.1% and betaine 0.1%. The presence or absence of bacterial colonization was examined using a surgical wound base swab with the Levine technique.\nRESULTS: In the 30 patients in this study, there was a significant decrease in bacterial levels (Log colony-forming unit [CFU]/g) after irrigation, both from irrigation with NaCl (p = 0.04) and NaCl + P + B (p < 0.001). The reduction in bacterial levels was more significant with NaCl + P + B compared with NaCl alone, at post-irrigation (p < 0.001), H+3 (p = 0.003), and H + 7 (p < 0.001).\nCONCLUSION: Wound irrigation using a combination of 0.9% NaCl, 0.1% polyhexanide, and 0.1% betaine reduced bacterial colonization more than using 0.9% NaCl-only solution in open fractures of long bones.","PeriodicalId":19562,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Decreasing Bacteria Colonization Wound Irrigation using 0.9% Nacl Compared with Wound Irrigation using Active Ingredients Polyhexanide 0.1% and 0.1% Betaine in Open Fractures of Long Bone\",\"authors\":\"I. Nyoman, Yuda Raditya, K. G. M. Ridia, I. W. Aryana, Ni Nengah, Dwi Fatmawati, I. Suyasa, Ksenija Bogoeva-Kostovska\",\"doi\":\"10.3889/oamjms.2023.11599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: An open fracture is an emergency case that must be treated quickly to prevent infection. The use of an irrigation solution containing 0.1% of the antimicrobial polyhexanide and 0.1% of the surfactant betaine has been associated with more satisfactory wound healing.\\nAIM: This study was comparing irrigation with polyhexanide 0.1% and betaine 0.1% (P + B) in reducing bacterial colonization of open fractures compared to using 0.9% natrium chloride (NaCl) solution.\\nMETHODS: This study uses a pre- and post-control group design. Sampling was carried out in the operation room of the emergency care installation, inpatient installation, and outpatient installation of prof. Hospital. Dr. I.G.N.G Ngoerah Denpasar, between September and  November  2022. From a sample population suffering from open fractures of the lower extremities, samples of patients were taken who were irrigated with 0.9% NaCl solution with a mixture of polyhexanide 0.1% and betaine 0.1%. The presence or absence of bacterial colonization was examined using a surgical wound base swab with the Levine technique.\\nRESULTS: In the 30 patients in this study, there was a significant decrease in bacterial levels (Log colony-forming unit [CFU]/g) after irrigation, both from irrigation with NaCl (p = 0.04) and NaCl + P + B (p < 0.001). The reduction in bacterial levels was more significant with NaCl + P + B compared with NaCl alone, at post-irrigation (p < 0.001), H+3 (p = 0.003), and H + 7 (p < 0.001).\\nCONCLUSION: Wound irrigation using a combination of 0.9% NaCl, 0.1% polyhexanide, and 0.1% betaine reduced bacterial colonization more than using 0.9% NaCl-only solution in open fractures of long bones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开放性骨折是一种急诊病例,必须迅速治疗以防止感染。使用含有0.1%抗菌聚己烷和0.1%表面活性剂甜菜碱的冲洗液与更令人满意的伤口愈合有关。目的:本研究比较0.1%聚己胺和0.1%甜菜碱(P + B)灌洗与0.9%氯化钠(NaCl)溶液灌洗对开放性骨折细菌定植的影响。方法:本研究采用前对照组和后对照组设计。在教授医院急诊装置、住院装置和门诊装置的手术室进行抽样。i.g.n.g.恩戈拉·登巴萨博士,2022年9月至11月。从患有下肢开放性骨折的样本人群中,取患者样本,用含有0.1%聚己烷和0.1%甜菜碱的混合物的0.9% NaCl溶液冲洗。使用莱文技术的外科伤口基础拭子检查细菌定植的存在或不存在。结果:在本研究的30例患者中,NaCl和NaCl + p + B冲洗后细菌水平(对数菌落形成单位[CFU]/g)均显著降低(p = 0.04)。在灌后(P < 0.001)、H+3 (P = 0.003)和H+ 7 (P < 0.001)条件下,NaCl + P + B对细菌水平的降低比单独使用NaCl更显著。结论:在开放性长骨骨折中,使用0.9% NaCl、0.1%聚己胺和0.1%甜菜碱联合冲洗伤口比使用0.9% NaCl溶液更能减少细菌定植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Decreasing Bacteria Colonization Wound Irrigation using 0.9% Nacl Compared with Wound Irrigation using Active Ingredients Polyhexanide 0.1% and 0.1% Betaine in Open Fractures of Long Bone
BACKGROUND: An open fracture is an emergency case that must be treated quickly to prevent infection. The use of an irrigation solution containing 0.1% of the antimicrobial polyhexanide and 0.1% of the surfactant betaine has been associated with more satisfactory wound healing. AIM: This study was comparing irrigation with polyhexanide 0.1% and betaine 0.1% (P + B) in reducing bacterial colonization of open fractures compared to using 0.9% natrium chloride (NaCl) solution. METHODS: This study uses a pre- and post-control group design. Sampling was carried out in the operation room of the emergency care installation, inpatient installation, and outpatient installation of prof. Hospital. Dr. I.G.N.G Ngoerah Denpasar, between September and  November  2022. From a sample population suffering from open fractures of the lower extremities, samples of patients were taken who were irrigated with 0.9% NaCl solution with a mixture of polyhexanide 0.1% and betaine 0.1%. The presence or absence of bacterial colonization was examined using a surgical wound base swab with the Levine technique. RESULTS: In the 30 patients in this study, there was a significant decrease in bacterial levels (Log colony-forming unit [CFU]/g) after irrigation, both from irrigation with NaCl (p = 0.04) and NaCl + P + B (p < 0.001). The reduction in bacterial levels was more significant with NaCl + P + B compared with NaCl alone, at post-irrigation (p < 0.001), H+3 (p = 0.003), and H + 7 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Wound irrigation using a combination of 0.9% NaCl, 0.1% polyhexanide, and 0.1% betaine reduced bacterial colonization more than using 0.9% NaCl-only solution in open fractures of long bones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1225
期刊介绍: Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (OAMJMS) [formerly known as Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences] is a top-tier open access medical science journal published by the ID Design 2012/DOOEL Skopje, Rajko Zhinzifov No 48, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. OAMJMS is an international, modern, general medical journal covering all areas in the medical sciences, from basic studies to large clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses. We publish mostly human studies that substantially enhance our understanding of disease epidemiology, etiology, and physiology; the development of prognostic and diagnostic technologies; trials that test the efficacy of specific interventions and those that compare different treatments; and systematic reviews. We aim to promote translation of basic research into clinical investigation, and of clinical evidence into practice. We publish occasional studies in animal models when they report outstanding research findings that are highly clinically relevant. Our audience is the international medical community as well as educators, policy makers, patient advocacy groups, and interested members of the public around the world. OAMJMS is published quarterly online version. The Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (OAMJMS) publishes Medical Informatics, Basic Science, Clinical Science, Case Report, Brief Communication, Public Health, Public Policy, and Review Article from all fields of medicine and related fields. This journal also publishes, continuously or occasionally, the bibliographies of the members of the Society, medical history, medical publications, thesis abstracts, book reviews, reports on meetings, i­n­formation on future meetings, important events and dates, and various headings which contribute to the development of the corresponding scientific field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信