利用推拉系泊框架探讨中国高校教师从传统课堂转向智能课堂的意向

IF 3.2 3区 管理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Zhangxiang Zhu, Zihui Peng, Kening Yang
{"title":"利用推拉系泊框架探讨中国高校教师从传统课堂转向智能课堂的意向","authors":"Zhangxiang Zhu, Zihui Peng, Kening Yang","doi":"10.1108/et-12-2021-0461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study explores the factors that promote university teachers' switching intention from a traditional classroom to a smart classroom based on the push–pull–mooring (PPM) framework to enrich the theoretical research on the smart classroom and provide a reference for smart classroom promotion.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed conceptual framework was developed from a comprehensive review of the related literature. This study tested and validated the proposed framework using a partial least square structural equation model based on 269 valid questionnaires.Findings(1) Perceived inefficiency, inquiry-based learning, future expectation and technical self-efficacy had significant effects on switching intention, while low participation, perceived usefulness and habit had no significant effects on university teachers’ switching intention in the smart classroom. (2) In the process of decision-making, the course category significantly moderates the impact of perceived inefficiency and technical self-efficacy on switching intention, while the user experience of smart classrooms significantly moderates the impact of perceived inefficiency on switching intention.Originality/valueThis study explains university teachers' switching intention from a traditional classroom to the smart classroom, which enriches the application area of the PPM framework.","PeriodicalId":47994,"journal":{"name":"Education and Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing the push–pull–mooring framework to explore university teachers' intention to switch from traditional classrooms to smart classrooms in China\",\"authors\":\"Zhangxiang Zhu, Zihui Peng, Kening Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/et-12-2021-0461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study explores the factors that promote university teachers' switching intention from a traditional classroom to a smart classroom based on the push–pull–mooring (PPM) framework to enrich the theoretical research on the smart classroom and provide a reference for smart classroom promotion.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed conceptual framework was developed from a comprehensive review of the related literature. This study tested and validated the proposed framework using a partial least square structural equation model based on 269 valid questionnaires.Findings(1) Perceived inefficiency, inquiry-based learning, future expectation and technical self-efficacy had significant effects on switching intention, while low participation, perceived usefulness and habit had no significant effects on university teachers’ switching intention in the smart classroom. (2) In the process of decision-making, the course category significantly moderates the impact of perceived inefficiency and technical self-efficacy on switching intention, while the user experience of smart classrooms significantly moderates the impact of perceived inefficiency on switching intention.Originality/valueThis study explains university teachers' switching intention from a traditional classroom to the smart classroom, which enriches the application area of the PPM framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-12-2021-0461\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-12-2021-0461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究基于推拉系泊(PPM)框架,探讨促进高校教师从传统课堂向智能课堂切换意愿的因素,丰富智慧课堂的理论研究,为智慧课堂推广提供参考。设计/方法/方法提出的概念框架是通过对相关文献的全面回顾而发展起来的。本研究基于269份有效问卷,采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型对所提出的框架进行了检验和验证。研究发现(1)感知效率低下、探究式学习、未来期望和技术自我效能感对智能课堂教师的转换意愿有显著影响,而低参与度、感知有用性和习惯对智能课堂教师的转换意愿没有显著影响。(2)在决策过程中,课程类别显著调节了感知效率低下和技术自我效能感对切换意愿的影响,而智能教室的用户体验显著调节了感知效率低下对切换意愿的影响。原创性/价值本研究解释了高校教师从传统课堂转向智能课堂的意向,丰富了PPM框架的应用领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing the push–pull–mooring framework to explore university teachers' intention to switch from traditional classrooms to smart classrooms in China
PurposeThis study explores the factors that promote university teachers' switching intention from a traditional classroom to a smart classroom based on the push–pull–mooring (PPM) framework to enrich the theoretical research on the smart classroom and provide a reference for smart classroom promotion.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed conceptual framework was developed from a comprehensive review of the related literature. This study tested and validated the proposed framework using a partial least square structural equation model based on 269 valid questionnaires.Findings(1) Perceived inefficiency, inquiry-based learning, future expectation and technical self-efficacy had significant effects on switching intention, while low participation, perceived usefulness and habit had no significant effects on university teachers’ switching intention in the smart classroom. (2) In the process of decision-making, the course category significantly moderates the impact of perceived inefficiency and technical self-efficacy on switching intention, while the user experience of smart classrooms significantly moderates the impact of perceived inefficiency on switching intention.Originality/valueThis study explains university teachers' switching intention from a traditional classroom to the smart classroom, which enriches the application area of the PPM framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Training
Education and Training EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Education + Training addresses the increasingly complex relationships between education, training and employment and the impact of these relationships on national and global labour markets. The journal gives specific consideration to young people, looking at how the transition from school/college to employment is achieved and how the nature of partnerships between the worlds of education and work continues to evolve. The journal explores vocationalism in learning and efforts to address employability within the curriculum, together with coverage of innovative themes and initiatives within vocational education and training. The journal is read by policy makers, educators and academics working in a wide range of fields including education, learning and skills development, enterprise and entrepreneurship education and training, induction and career development. Coverage: Managing the transition from school/college to work New initiatives in post 16 vocational education and training Education-Business partnerships and collaboration Links between education and industry The graduate labour market Work experience and placements The recruitment, induction and development of school leavers and graduates Young person employability and career development E learning in further and higher education Research news Reviews of recent publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信