金融和银行业机密信息的获取:法院在Altmann, Baumeister, UBS和Buccioni的判决

Q2 Social Sciences

Law and Financial Markets Review Pub Date : 2019-09-25 DOI:10.1080/17521440.2019.1668130

Carla Farinhas

{"title":"金融和银行业机密信息的获取:法院在Altmann, Baumeister, UBS和Buccioni的判决","authors":"Carla Farinhas","doi":"10.1080/17521440.2019.1668130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the years between 2014 and 2018, in judgements Altmann, Baumeister, UBS and Buccioni, the Court examined the scope of the obligation of professional secrecy incumbent on financial and banking supervisory authorities of Member States pursuant to Article 54 MiFID and Article 53 CRD. The Court has not only clarified the notion of “confidential information” but has also provided guidance to national courts on how to reconcile the concerns which underpin the obligation of professional secrecy laid down by the EU legislator in this field and certain core values to democracy and to the rule of law in the EU.","PeriodicalId":43241,"journal":{"name":"Law and Financial Markets Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"203 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17521440.2019.1668130","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to confidential information in the financial and banking sectors: judgements of the Court of Justice in Altmann, Baumeister, UBS and Buccioni\",\"authors\":\"Carla Farinhas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17521440.2019.1668130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the years between 2014 and 2018, in judgements Altmann, Baumeister, UBS and Buccioni, the Court examined the scope of the obligation of professional secrecy incumbent on financial and banking supervisory authorities of Member States pursuant to Article 54 MiFID and Article 53 CRD. The Court has not only clarified the notion of “confidential information” but has also provided guidance to national courts on how to reconcile the concerns which underpin the obligation of professional secrecy laid down by the EU legislator in this field and certain core values to democracy and to the rule of law in the EU.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and Financial Markets Review\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"203 - 210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17521440.2019.1668130\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and Financial Markets Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2019.1668130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Financial Markets Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2019.1668130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在2014年至2018年期间，在Altmann、Baumeister、UBS和Bucconi的判决中，法院根据《金融情报法》第54条和《CRD》第53条审查了成员国金融和银行监管机构的职业保密义务范围。法院不仅澄清了“机密信息”的概念，而且还就如何协调欧盟立法者在这一领域规定的职业保密义务与欧盟民主和法治的某些核心价值观之间的关系，向国家法院提供了指导。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Access to confidential information in the financial and banking sectors: judgements of the Court of Justice in Altmann, Baumeister, UBS and Buccioni

In the years between 2014 and 2018, in judgements Altmann, Baumeister, UBS and Buccioni, the Court examined the scope of the obligation of professional secrecy incumbent on financial and banking supervisory authorities of Member States pursuant to Article 54 MiFID and Article 53 CRD. The Court has not only clarified the notion of “confidential information” but has also provided guidance to national courts on how to reconcile the concerns which underpin the obligation of professional secrecy laid down by the EU legislator in this field and certain core values to democracy and to the rule of law in the EU.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Law and Financial Markets Review LAW-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Law and Financial Markets Review is a new, independent, English language journal devoted to providing high quality information, comment and analysis for lawyers specialising in banking and financial market issues and to others with interests in legal and regulatory developments affecting the financial markets. Published four times a year LFMR contains articles written by leading experts providing a forum for practical guidance on, as well as reflective and topical analysis of, all major jurisdictions, with a particular focus on the interaction between the law and market practice and behaviour.