花花公子、花花公子和后女权主义父亲:休·格兰特和现代男子气概的变化

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES
R. Feasey
{"title":"花花公子、花花公子和后女权主义父亲:休·格兰特和现代男子气概的变化","authors":"R. Feasey","doi":"10.1080/19392397.2022.2159673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Extant research on Hugh Grant’s star image routinely combines issues of masculinity, sexuality and national identity. Such work concludes that the stumbling, stammering English gent that he mastered for the character of Charles Thacker in Four Weddings and a Funeral or the dishonourable bounder and morally reprehensible cad that he played so brilliantly in Bridget Jones’s Diary is a perfect fit with the man himself. Either way, this article will consider the ways in which film critics and commentators have read and responded to Grant’s on-screen performances and off-screen persona in order to open up a dialogue about shifting iterations of masculinity. Grant is routinely at the forefront of changing definitions of modern manhood, morphing from New Man to New Lad before being constructed and circulated as a figurehead of post-feminist fatherhood. In short, Grant stands as a testament to the very fluid, flexible and shifting nature of the hegemonic hierarchy.","PeriodicalId":46401,"journal":{"name":"Celebrity Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"66 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fop, bounder and post-feminist father: Hugh Grant and the changing face of modern masculinity\",\"authors\":\"R. Feasey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19392397.2022.2159673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Extant research on Hugh Grant’s star image routinely combines issues of masculinity, sexuality and national identity. Such work concludes that the stumbling, stammering English gent that he mastered for the character of Charles Thacker in Four Weddings and a Funeral or the dishonourable bounder and morally reprehensible cad that he played so brilliantly in Bridget Jones’s Diary is a perfect fit with the man himself. Either way, this article will consider the ways in which film critics and commentators have read and responded to Grant’s on-screen performances and off-screen persona in order to open up a dialogue about shifting iterations of masculinity. Grant is routinely at the forefront of changing definitions of modern manhood, morphing from New Man to New Lad before being constructed and circulated as a figurehead of post-feminist fatherhood. In short, Grant stands as a testament to the very fluid, flexible and shifting nature of the hegemonic hierarchy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Celebrity Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"66 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Celebrity Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2022.2159673\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Celebrity Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2022.2159673","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:对休·格兰特明星形象的现有研究经常将男性气质、性取向和民族认同问题结合起来。这样的作品得出的结论是,他在《四个婚礼和一个葬礼》中为查尔斯·塔克(Charles Thacker)一角塑造的跌跌撞撞、结结巴巴的英国绅士,或者他在《布里奇特·琼斯日记》中出色地扮演的不光彩的无赖和道德上应受谴责的无赖,都非常适合这个人。无论哪种方式,这篇文章都将考虑影评人和评论家阅读和回应格兰特在银幕上的表演和银幕下的角色的方式,以便开启一场关于男性气质不断变化的对话。格兰特经常站在改变现代男子气概定义的最前沿,在被塑造和传播为后女权主义父亲的名义领袖之前,他从“新男人”变成了“新小伙子”。简言之,格兰特证明了霸权等级制度的流动性、灵活性和变化性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fop, bounder and post-feminist father: Hugh Grant and the changing face of modern masculinity
ABSTRACT Extant research on Hugh Grant’s star image routinely combines issues of masculinity, sexuality and national identity. Such work concludes that the stumbling, stammering English gent that he mastered for the character of Charles Thacker in Four Weddings and a Funeral or the dishonourable bounder and morally reprehensible cad that he played so brilliantly in Bridget Jones’s Diary is a perfect fit with the man himself. Either way, this article will consider the ways in which film critics and commentators have read and responded to Grant’s on-screen performances and off-screen persona in order to open up a dialogue about shifting iterations of masculinity. Grant is routinely at the forefront of changing definitions of modern manhood, morphing from New Man to New Lad before being constructed and circulated as a figurehead of post-feminist fatherhood. In short, Grant stands as a testament to the very fluid, flexible and shifting nature of the hegemonic hierarchy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Celebrity Studies
Celebrity Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信