田间条件下硅肥和抗性诱导剂防治苹果、梨赤霉病的效果评价

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
G. Percival
{"title":"田间条件下硅肥和抗性诱导剂防治苹果、梨赤霉病的效果评价","authors":"G. Percival","doi":"10.48044/JAUF.2018.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two field trials were conducted using established apple (Malus cv. Golden Delicious) and pear (Pyrus communis ‘Williams’ Bon Chrétien’) to assess the efficacy of a range of silicon (Si) fertilizers, a resistance-inducing (IR) agent based on salicylic acid and a combination of Si + IR when applied at four growth stages of tree development (i.e., bud break, green cluster, 90% petal fall, early fruitlet) against the foliar pathogens apple (Venturia inaequalis) and pear (V. pirina) scab. In addition, a comparative evaluation of a conventional synthetic fungicide (penconazole) used within the UK for apple and pear scab control was performed. Greatest protection against apple and pear scab was provided by a combination of a Si fertilizer + IR agent and the synthetic fungicide penconazole in both the 2014 and 2015 field trials where statistically comparable degrees of control were achieved. Efficacy as scab-protectant compounds (i.e., reduced scab severity of leaves and fruit) enhanced leaf chlorophyll content and fruit yield, and was confirmed when each Si fertilizer was applied at four growth stages during two growing seasons; however, there was little difference in the degree of control conferred by each Si fertilizer. The IR agent used alone proved the least effective scab protectant compound.","PeriodicalId":39043,"journal":{"name":"Arboriculture and Urban Forestry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Silicon Fertilizers and a Resistance Inducing Agent for Control of Apple and Pear Scab under Field Conditions\",\"authors\":\"G. Percival\",\"doi\":\"10.48044/JAUF.2018.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two field trials were conducted using established apple (Malus cv. Golden Delicious) and pear (Pyrus communis ‘Williams’ Bon Chrétien’) to assess the efficacy of a range of silicon (Si) fertilizers, a resistance-inducing (IR) agent based on salicylic acid and a combination of Si + IR when applied at four growth stages of tree development (i.e., bud break, green cluster, 90% petal fall, early fruitlet) against the foliar pathogens apple (Venturia inaequalis) and pear (V. pirina) scab. In addition, a comparative evaluation of a conventional synthetic fungicide (penconazole) used within the UK for apple and pear scab control was performed. Greatest protection against apple and pear scab was provided by a combination of a Si fertilizer + IR agent and the synthetic fungicide penconazole in both the 2014 and 2015 field trials where statistically comparable degrees of control were achieved. Efficacy as scab-protectant compounds (i.e., reduced scab severity of leaves and fruit) enhanced leaf chlorophyll content and fruit yield, and was confirmed when each Si fertilizer was applied at four growth stages during two growing seasons; however, there was little difference in the degree of control conferred by each Si fertilizer. The IR agent used alone proved the least effective scab protectant compound.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arboriculture and Urban Forestry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arboriculture and Urban Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48044/JAUF.2018.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arboriculture and Urban Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48044/JAUF.2018.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

利用成熟的苹果(Malus cv.)进行了两次田间试验。金冠)和梨(Pyrus communis ' Williams ' Bon chr tien '),以评估在树木发育的四个生长阶段(即芽裂、绿簇、90%花瓣脱落、早期果实)施用一系列硅(Si)肥料、基于水杨酸的抗性诱导(IR)剂和Si + IR组合对叶片病原菌苹果(Venturia inaequalis)和梨(V. pirina)痂的效果。此外,对英国用于控制苹果和梨结痂的传统合成杀菌剂(戊康唑)进行了比较评价。在2014年和2015年的田间试验中,硅肥+红外剂和合成杀菌剂苯康唑的组合对苹果和梨结痂的保护作用最大,控制程度在统计上可比较。作为防结痂化合物的功效(即降低叶片和果实的结痂严重程度)提高了叶片叶绿素含量和果实产量,并且在两个生长季节的四个生长阶段施用每种硅肥时得到证实;然而,每种硅肥所赋予的控制程度差异不大。单独使用IR剂是最不有效的结痂保护剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Silicon Fertilizers and a Resistance Inducing Agent for Control of Apple and Pear Scab under Field Conditions
Two field trials were conducted using established apple (Malus cv. Golden Delicious) and pear (Pyrus communis ‘Williams’ Bon Chrétien’) to assess the efficacy of a range of silicon (Si) fertilizers, a resistance-inducing (IR) agent based on salicylic acid and a combination of Si + IR when applied at four growth stages of tree development (i.e., bud break, green cluster, 90% petal fall, early fruitlet) against the foliar pathogens apple (Venturia inaequalis) and pear (V. pirina) scab. In addition, a comparative evaluation of a conventional synthetic fungicide (penconazole) used within the UK for apple and pear scab control was performed. Greatest protection against apple and pear scab was provided by a combination of a Si fertilizer + IR agent and the synthetic fungicide penconazole in both the 2014 and 2015 field trials where statistically comparable degrees of control were achieved. Efficacy as scab-protectant compounds (i.e., reduced scab severity of leaves and fruit) enhanced leaf chlorophyll content and fruit yield, and was confirmed when each Si fertilizer was applied at four growth stages during two growing seasons; however, there was little difference in the degree of control conferred by each Si fertilizer. The IR agent used alone proved the least effective scab protectant compound.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arboriculture and Urban Forestry
Arboriculture and Urban Forestry Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信