比较等值线和刻度符号:不同地图类型如何影响印度尼西亚巴厘巴东县公众对COVID-19地图阅读的理解

IF 0.7 Q4 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Tri Tanami Sukraini, I. M. A. Yasa, P. Wiguna
{"title":"比较等值线和刻度符号:不同地图类型如何影响印度尼西亚巴厘巴东县公众对COVID-19地图阅读的理解","authors":"Tri Tanami Sukraini, I. M. A. Yasa, P. Wiguna","doi":"10.21163/gt_2022.171.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information on COVID-19 is vital in protecting the entire community. As the diffusion pattern changes rapidly over time, originally simple data must be presented differently to provide more representative and quickly readable information. Relevant data are now offered in maps to support the public dissemination of COVID-19 information, with Choropleth and Graduated Symbols being the most common map types. This research was the first to analyze community’s map reading skills, particularly in interpreting or understanding Indonesia’s COVID-19 case distribution portrayed on the map. To test both map types, an online questionnaire was sent to respondents selected by random sampling from people living in Badung Regency. Then, they were given 11 tasks, namely to identify, find extreme values, differentiate, retrieve values, compare, interpret, categorize, group, sort, associate, and locate information contents on both maps. Then, chi-squared, Cramer's V, and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to statistically analyze three aspects: accuracy, time, and level of difficulty. The results showed that the choropleth map was easier to read than the graduated symbols. Furthermore, the null hypothesis (H0) was rejected, which means there is a correlation between map type and community’s ability to read and understand maps. © 2022, Asociatia Geographia Technica. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":45100,"journal":{"name":"Geographia Technica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARING CHOROPLETH AND GRADUATED SYMBOLS: HOW DIFFERENT MAP TYPES AFFECT PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING IN COVID-19 MAP READING IN BADUNG REGENCY, BALI, INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"Tri Tanami Sukraini, I. M. A. Yasa, P. Wiguna\",\"doi\":\"10.21163/gt_2022.171.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Information on COVID-19 is vital in protecting the entire community. As the diffusion pattern changes rapidly over time, originally simple data must be presented differently to provide more representative and quickly readable information. Relevant data are now offered in maps to support the public dissemination of COVID-19 information, with Choropleth and Graduated Symbols being the most common map types. This research was the first to analyze community’s map reading skills, particularly in interpreting or understanding Indonesia’s COVID-19 case distribution portrayed on the map. To test both map types, an online questionnaire was sent to respondents selected by random sampling from people living in Badung Regency. Then, they were given 11 tasks, namely to identify, find extreme values, differentiate, retrieve values, compare, interpret, categorize, group, sort, associate, and locate information contents on both maps. Then, chi-squared, Cramer's V, and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to statistically analyze three aspects: accuracy, time, and level of difficulty. The results showed that the choropleth map was easier to read than the graduated symbols. Furthermore, the null hypothesis (H0) was rejected, which means there is a correlation between map type and community’s ability to read and understand maps. © 2022, Asociatia Geographia Technica. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographia Technica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographia Technica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21163/gt_2022.171.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographia Technica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21163/gt_2022.171.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关于新冠肺炎的信息对于保护整个社区至关重要。随着扩散模式随着时间的推移而快速变化,必须以不同的方式呈现最初简单的数据,以提供更具代表性和快速可读的信息。现在地图中提供了相关数据,以支持新冠肺炎信息的公开传播,Choropleth和Graded Symbols是最常见的地图类型。这项研究首次分析了社区的地图阅读技能,特别是在解释或理解地图上描绘的印度尼西亚新冠肺炎病例分布方面。为了测试这两种地图类型,向从巴东县居民中随机抽样选出的受访者发送了一份在线问卷。然后,他们被赋予了11项任务,即识别、找到极值、区分、检索值、比较、解释、分类、分组、排序、关联和定位两张地图上的信息内容。然后,进行卡方检验、Cramer V检验和Mann-Whitney U检验,从准确性、时间和难度三个方面进行统计分析。结果表明,choropleth图比刻度符号更容易阅读。此外,零假设(H0)被拒绝,这意味着地图类型与社区阅读和理解地图的能力之间存在相关性。©2022,地理技术协会。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARING CHOROPLETH AND GRADUATED SYMBOLS: HOW DIFFERENT MAP TYPES AFFECT PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING IN COVID-19 MAP READING IN BADUNG REGENCY, BALI, INDONESIA
Information on COVID-19 is vital in protecting the entire community. As the diffusion pattern changes rapidly over time, originally simple data must be presented differently to provide more representative and quickly readable information. Relevant data are now offered in maps to support the public dissemination of COVID-19 information, with Choropleth and Graduated Symbols being the most common map types. This research was the first to analyze community’s map reading skills, particularly in interpreting or understanding Indonesia’s COVID-19 case distribution portrayed on the map. To test both map types, an online questionnaire was sent to respondents selected by random sampling from people living in Badung Regency. Then, they were given 11 tasks, namely to identify, find extreme values, differentiate, retrieve values, compare, interpret, categorize, group, sort, associate, and locate information contents on both maps. Then, chi-squared, Cramer's V, and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to statistically analyze three aspects: accuracy, time, and level of difficulty. The results showed that the choropleth map was easier to read than the graduated symbols. Furthermore, the null hypothesis (H0) was rejected, which means there is a correlation between map type and community’s ability to read and understand maps. © 2022, Asociatia Geographia Technica. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geographia Technica
Geographia Technica GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Geographia Technica is a journal devoted to the publication of all papers on all aspects of the use of technical and quantitative methods in geographical research. It aims at presenting its readers with the latest developments in G.I.S technology, mathematical methods applicable to any field of geography, territorial micro-scalar and laboratory experiments, and the latest developments induced by the measurement techniques to the geographical research. Geographia Technica is dedicated to all those who understand that nowadays every field of geography can only be described by specific numerical values, variables both oftime and space which require the sort of numerical analysis only possible with the aid of technical and quantitative methods offered by powerful computers and dedicated software. Our understanding of Geographia Technica expands the concept of technical methods applied to geography to its broadest sense and for that, papers of different interests such as: G.l.S, Spatial Analysis, Remote Sensing, Cartography or Geostatistics as well as papers which, by promoting the above mentioned directions bring a technical approach in the fields of hydrology, climatology, geomorphology, human geography territorial planning are more than welcomed provided they are of sufficient wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信