子宫切除术的首选和实际方法:对南非妇产科学会成员目前做法的调查

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Andreas K. Chrysostomou, D. Djokovic
{"title":"子宫切除术的首选和实际方法:对南非妇产科学会成员目前做法的调查","authors":"Andreas K. Chrysostomou, D. Djokovic","doi":"10.7196/SAJOG.1558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Hysterectomy remains one of the most common operative procedures for benign uterine diseases. Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) constitutes the most common approach despite the advantages of minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH). Objectives. To explore the current opinion on hysterectomy choices amongst members of the South African Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (SASOG), as well as the perceptions and potential barriers that may inhibit gynaecologists from offering MIH to their patients. Methodology. An anonymous survey designed to explore the preferences of practising obstetrician gynaecologists regarding the optimal hysterectomy procedure, and perceived barriers towards MIH. Results. The average age of the respondents ( N =152) was 45.7 years, with 88.2% having >5 years’ experience in private practice. When asked about the preferred route of hysterectomy for themselves or their relatives, 46.2% chose vaginal hysterectomy (VH), 25.4% chose total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), 15% chose laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and 8.5% chose TAH. However, the most commonly performed hysterectomy procedure undertaken by the respondents in the last year was TAH. Only half of the respondents wished to increase their rate of VH and a lesser number to extend their laparoscopic hysterectomy rates. Conclusion. Although the majority of the respondents preferred the minimally-invasive VH or TLH for themselves or their relatives, TAH remains the most common hysterectomy method among SA gynaecologists. This difference could present an ethical dilemma for the gynaecologist. The desire of a minority to change their approach to VH indicates the difficulty in changing attitudes and the need to promote VH as a technique within SASOG.","PeriodicalId":49579,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferred and actual methods of hysterectomy: A survey of current practices among members of the South African Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists\",\"authors\":\"Andreas K. Chrysostomou, D. Djokovic\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJOG.1558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Hysterectomy remains one of the most common operative procedures for benign uterine diseases. Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) constitutes the most common approach despite the advantages of minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH). Objectives. To explore the current opinion on hysterectomy choices amongst members of the South African Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (SASOG), as well as the perceptions and potential barriers that may inhibit gynaecologists from offering MIH to their patients. Methodology. An anonymous survey designed to explore the preferences of practising obstetrician gynaecologists regarding the optimal hysterectomy procedure, and perceived barriers towards MIH. Results. The average age of the respondents ( N =152) was 45.7 years, with 88.2% having >5 years’ experience in private practice. When asked about the preferred route of hysterectomy for themselves or their relatives, 46.2% chose vaginal hysterectomy (VH), 25.4% chose total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), 15% chose laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and 8.5% chose TAH. However, the most commonly performed hysterectomy procedure undertaken by the respondents in the last year was TAH. Only half of the respondents wished to increase their rate of VH and a lesser number to extend their laparoscopic hysterectomy rates. Conclusion. Although the majority of the respondents preferred the minimally-invasive VH or TLH for themselves or their relatives, TAH remains the most common hysterectomy method among SA gynaecologists. This difference could present an ethical dilemma for the gynaecologist. The desire of a minority to change their approach to VH indicates the difficulty in changing attitudes and the need to promote VH as a technique within SASOG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJOG.1558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJOG.1558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景子宫切除术仍然是治疗良性子宫疾病最常见的手术方法之一。腹式全子宫切除术(TAH)是最常见的方法,尽管微创子宫切除术具有优势。目标。探讨南非妇产科学会(SASOG)成员目前对子宫切除术选择的看法,以及可能阻碍妇科医生向患者提供MIH的看法和潜在障碍。方法论一项匿名调查旨在探讨执业妇产科医生对最佳子宫切除术的偏好,以及对MIH的障碍。后果受访者的平均年龄(N=152)为45.7岁,88.2%的人有5年以上的私人执业经验。当被问及自己或亲属首选的子宫切除术路线时,46.2%的人选择了阴道子宫切除术(VH),25.4%的人选择全腹腔镜子宫切除术,15%的人选择腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除手术(LAVH)和8.5%的人选择TAH。然而,受访者在去年进行的最常见的子宫切除术是TAH。只有一半的受访者希望提高VH的发生率,较少的受访者希望延长腹腔镜子宫切除术的发生率。结论尽管大多数受访者更喜欢自己或亲属使用微创VH或TLH,但TAH仍然是SA妇科医生中最常见的子宫切除术方法。这种差异可能会给妇科医生带来道德困境。少数人希望改变他们对VH的态度,这表明改变态度的困难,以及在SASOG中推广VH作为一种技术的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preferred and actual methods of hysterectomy: A survey of current practices among members of the South African Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Background. Hysterectomy remains one of the most common operative procedures for benign uterine diseases. Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) constitutes the most common approach despite the advantages of minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH). Objectives. To explore the current opinion on hysterectomy choices amongst members of the South African Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (SASOG), as well as the perceptions and potential barriers that may inhibit gynaecologists from offering MIH to their patients. Methodology. An anonymous survey designed to explore the preferences of practising obstetrician gynaecologists regarding the optimal hysterectomy procedure, and perceived barriers towards MIH. Results. The average age of the respondents ( N =152) was 45.7 years, with 88.2% having >5 years’ experience in private practice. When asked about the preferred route of hysterectomy for themselves or their relatives, 46.2% chose vaginal hysterectomy (VH), 25.4% chose total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), 15% chose laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and 8.5% chose TAH. However, the most commonly performed hysterectomy procedure undertaken by the respondents in the last year was TAH. Only half of the respondents wished to increase their rate of VH and a lesser number to extend their laparoscopic hysterectomy rates. Conclusion. Although the majority of the respondents preferred the minimally-invasive VH or TLH for themselves or their relatives, TAH remains the most common hysterectomy method among SA gynaecologists. This difference could present an ethical dilemma for the gynaecologist. The desire of a minority to change their approach to VH indicates the difficulty in changing attitudes and the need to promote VH as a technique within SASOG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The SAJOG is a tri-annual, general specialist obstetrics and gynaecology journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. The journal carries original research articles, editorials, clinical practice, personal opinion, South Africa health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信