Xian-tao Li, Yanyan Huang, Ruiquan Chen, Meihong Guo, P. Guo
{"title":"术中囊圈栓塞在II型内溢高危人群血管内主动脉修复术后的应用","authors":"Xian-tao Li, Yanyan Huang, Ruiquan Chen, Meihong Guo, P. Guo","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the effectiveness and safety of intraoperative sac coiling embolization among patients who are athigh-risk developing type-Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair(EVAR). \n \n \nMethods \nFrom Jan 2014 to Jan 2018, one hundred and twelve consecutive patients with infra-renal AAA were enrolled for this study, There were 76 patients undergoing standard EVAR (standard-group)and 36 patients doing aneurysmal sac coiling embolization (embo-group). Baseline characteristics, aneurysmal sac parameters, radiological intervention details and follow up results were recorded. \n \n \nResults \nMean follow-up time was 25.9 m for embo-group. During follow-up period, no coils-related complications were noted and no type-Ⅱ endoleak associated secondary interventions were reported. A mean of (2.72±1.16) coils (range 1-7) was used in the embo-group. The incidence of type Ⅱ endoleak was 30.3%(23/76) in standard-group and 11.1%(4/36) in embo-group(χ2=4.90, P=0.027). Logistic multivariate analysis revealed that the independent risk factors of type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair for high-risk patients were those EVAR without sac embolization and sac volume≥128 cm3. In the subgroup analysis (sac volume≥128 cm3), the incidence of type-Ⅱ endoleak was lower in embo-group compared to standard-group (χ2=6.07, P=0.014). \n \n \nConclusion \nIntraoperative sac coiling embolization in high-risk patients is safe and effective in prevention of type Ⅱ endoleak. This preventive effect is more significant with large sac aneurysm compared to small sac aneurysm. \n \n \nKey words: \nAortic aneurysm, abdominal; Radiology, interventional; Endoleak; Risk assessment","PeriodicalId":66425,"journal":{"name":"中华普通外科杂志","volume":"34 1","pages":"745-749"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative sac coiling embolization in type II endoleak high-risk population after endovascular aortic repair\",\"authors\":\"Xian-tao Li, Yanyan Huang, Ruiquan Chen, Meihong Guo, P. Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the effectiveness and safety of intraoperative sac coiling embolization among patients who are athigh-risk developing type-Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair(EVAR). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom Jan 2014 to Jan 2018, one hundred and twelve consecutive patients with infra-renal AAA were enrolled for this study, There were 76 patients undergoing standard EVAR (standard-group)and 36 patients doing aneurysmal sac coiling embolization (embo-group). Baseline characteristics, aneurysmal sac parameters, radiological intervention details and follow up results were recorded. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nMean follow-up time was 25.9 m for embo-group. During follow-up period, no coils-related complications were noted and no type-Ⅱ endoleak associated secondary interventions were reported. A mean of (2.72±1.16) coils (range 1-7) was used in the embo-group. The incidence of type Ⅱ endoleak was 30.3%(23/76) in standard-group and 11.1%(4/36) in embo-group(χ2=4.90, P=0.027). Logistic multivariate analysis revealed that the independent risk factors of type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair for high-risk patients were those EVAR without sac embolization and sac volume≥128 cm3. In the subgroup analysis (sac volume≥128 cm3), the incidence of type-Ⅱ endoleak was lower in embo-group compared to standard-group (χ2=6.07, P=0.014). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nIntraoperative sac coiling embolization in high-risk patients is safe and effective in prevention of type Ⅱ endoleak. This preventive effect is more significant with large sac aneurysm compared to small sac aneurysm. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nAortic aneurysm, abdominal; Radiology, interventional; Endoleak; Risk assessment\",\"PeriodicalId\":66425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华普通外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"745-749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华普通外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华普通外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intraoperative sac coiling embolization in type II endoleak high-risk population after endovascular aortic repair
Objective
To investigate the effectiveness and safety of intraoperative sac coiling embolization among patients who are athigh-risk developing type-Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair(EVAR).
Methods
From Jan 2014 to Jan 2018, one hundred and twelve consecutive patients with infra-renal AAA were enrolled for this study, There were 76 patients undergoing standard EVAR (standard-group)and 36 patients doing aneurysmal sac coiling embolization (embo-group). Baseline characteristics, aneurysmal sac parameters, radiological intervention details and follow up results were recorded.
Results
Mean follow-up time was 25.9 m for embo-group. During follow-up period, no coils-related complications were noted and no type-Ⅱ endoleak associated secondary interventions were reported. A mean of (2.72±1.16) coils (range 1-7) was used in the embo-group. The incidence of type Ⅱ endoleak was 30.3%(23/76) in standard-group and 11.1%(4/36) in embo-group(χ2=4.90, P=0.027). Logistic multivariate analysis revealed that the independent risk factors of type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair for high-risk patients were those EVAR without sac embolization and sac volume≥128 cm3. In the subgroup analysis (sac volume≥128 cm3), the incidence of type-Ⅱ endoleak was lower in embo-group compared to standard-group (χ2=6.07, P=0.014).
Conclusion
Intraoperative sac coiling embolization in high-risk patients is safe and effective in prevention of type Ⅱ endoleak. This preventive effect is more significant with large sac aneurysm compared to small sac aneurysm.
Key words:
Aortic aneurysm, abdominal; Radiology, interventional; Endoleak; Risk assessment