态度上的Santri:印尼虔诚的穆斯林对恐怖主义的支持和对非穆斯林的消极态度

IF 1.3 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
G. Barton, M. Vergani, Y. Wahid
{"title":"态度上的Santri:印尼虔诚的穆斯林对恐怖主义的支持和对非穆斯林的消极态度","authors":"G. Barton, M. Vergani, Y. Wahid","doi":"10.1080/19434472.2021.1944272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Scholars continue to wrestle with determining the extent and ways in which religiosity – and particularly more strict religious views and practices – provides fertile ground for the emergence and growth of terrorism. Using large samples of Muslim respondents from across the Indonesian archipelago, we find that: (1) higher levels of orthodox religiosity are associated with more negative attitudes to non-Muslims, and (2) higher levels of orthodox religiosity are associated with lower support for terrorist groups. We propose that this finding is consistent with the type of orthodox religiosity of Indonesian santri – that is, observant Muslims – which is usually characterised by collective religious practices, affiliation with religious mass organisations and religious education. In the Indonesian context, orthodox religiosity might provide vehicles but not motives of terrorist mobilisation, and – although it can foster negative views of out-groups – it can actually constitute a barrier to broader support for terrorism.","PeriodicalId":54174,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","volume":"15 1","pages":"321 - 335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19434472.2021.1944272","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Santri with attitude: support for terrorism and negative attitudes to non-Muslims among Indonesian observant Muslims\",\"authors\":\"G. Barton, M. Vergani, Y. Wahid\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19434472.2021.1944272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Scholars continue to wrestle with determining the extent and ways in which religiosity – and particularly more strict religious views and practices – provides fertile ground for the emergence and growth of terrorism. Using large samples of Muslim respondents from across the Indonesian archipelago, we find that: (1) higher levels of orthodox religiosity are associated with more negative attitudes to non-Muslims, and (2) higher levels of orthodox religiosity are associated with lower support for terrorist groups. We propose that this finding is consistent with the type of orthodox religiosity of Indonesian santri – that is, observant Muslims – which is usually characterised by collective religious practices, affiliation with religious mass organisations and religious education. In the Indonesian context, orthodox religiosity might provide vehicles but not motives of terrorist mobilisation, and – although it can foster negative views of out-groups – it can actually constitute a barrier to broader support for terrorism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"321 - 335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19434472.2021.1944272\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2021.1944272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2021.1944272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

学者们继续努力确定宗教信仰——尤其是更严格的宗教观点和实践——为恐怖主义的出现和发展提供肥沃土壤的程度和方式。使用来自印尼群岛各地的穆斯林受访者的大量样本,我们发现:(1)正统宗教信仰水平越高,对非穆斯林的态度越消极;(2)正统宗教宗教信仰水平高,对恐怖组织的支持越低。我们认为,这一发现与印尼圣德里人(即善于观察的穆斯林)的正统宗教信仰类型一致,其特征通常是集体宗教实践、与宗教群众组织的关系和宗教教育。在印度尼西亚的背景下,正统的宗教信仰可能提供了动员恐怖分子的工具,但不是动机,尽管它可能会助长外部团体的负面看法,但它实际上可能构成更广泛支持恐怖主义的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Santri with attitude: support for terrorism and negative attitudes to non-Muslims among Indonesian observant Muslims
ABSTRACT Scholars continue to wrestle with determining the extent and ways in which religiosity – and particularly more strict religious views and practices – provides fertile ground for the emergence and growth of terrorism. Using large samples of Muslim respondents from across the Indonesian archipelago, we find that: (1) higher levels of orthodox religiosity are associated with more negative attitudes to non-Muslims, and (2) higher levels of orthodox religiosity are associated with lower support for terrorist groups. We propose that this finding is consistent with the type of orthodox religiosity of Indonesian santri – that is, observant Muslims – which is usually characterised by collective religious practices, affiliation with religious mass organisations and religious education. In the Indonesian context, orthodox religiosity might provide vehicles but not motives of terrorist mobilisation, and – although it can foster negative views of out-groups – it can actually constitute a barrier to broader support for terrorism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信