{"title":"亲属关系还是友谊?","authors":"M. Häcker","doi":"10.1075/JHP.17005.HAC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The use of the word cousin as a term of address for non-relatives in late-medieval and\n Renaissance English is well documented in letters between monarchs, but weak for other social groups in the standard dictionaries,\n with one example each in the Oxford English Dictionary and the Middle English Dictionary. As it\n is difficult to establish for earlier periods whether people were blood relations, an investigation of cousin as\n a term of address needs to establish the relationship between addressor and addressee, as far as possible, from independent\n historical sources. This study is based on the use of the term cousin in letters, as this often provides precise\n information on the relationships of correspondents. This investigation documents the use of cousin from the\n thirteenth to the early-sixteenth century in all literate ranks of society and concludes that the royal use of\n cousin constitutes a relic of an earlier more widespread use.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinship or friendship?\",\"authors\":\"M. Häcker\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JHP.17005.HAC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The use of the word cousin as a term of address for non-relatives in late-medieval and\\n Renaissance English is well documented in letters between monarchs, but weak for other social groups in the standard dictionaries,\\n with one example each in the Oxford English Dictionary and the Middle English Dictionary. As it\\n is difficult to establish for earlier periods whether people were blood relations, an investigation of cousin as\\n a term of address needs to establish the relationship between addressor and addressee, as far as possible, from independent\\n historical sources. This study is based on the use of the term cousin in letters, as this often provides precise\\n information on the relationships of correspondents. This investigation documents the use of cousin from the\\n thirteenth to the early-sixteenth century in all literate ranks of society and concludes that the royal use of\\n cousin constitutes a relic of an earlier more widespread use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.17005.HAC\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.17005.HAC","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of the word cousin as a term of address for non-relatives in late-medieval and
Renaissance English is well documented in letters between monarchs, but weak for other social groups in the standard dictionaries,
with one example each in the Oxford English Dictionary and the Middle English Dictionary. As it
is difficult to establish for earlier periods whether people were blood relations, an investigation of cousin as
a term of address needs to establish the relationship between addressor and addressee, as far as possible, from independent
historical sources. This study is based on the use of the term cousin in letters, as this often provides precise
information on the relationships of correspondents. This investigation documents the use of cousin from the
thirteenth to the early-sixteenth century in all literate ranks of society and concludes that the royal use of
cousin constitutes a relic of an earlier more widespread use.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.