亲属关系还是友谊?

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
M. Häcker
{"title":"亲属关系还是友谊?","authors":"M. Häcker","doi":"10.1075/JHP.17005.HAC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The use of the word cousin as a term of address for non-relatives in late-medieval and\n Renaissance English is well documented in letters between monarchs, but weak for other social groups in the standard dictionaries,\n with one example each in the Oxford English Dictionary and the Middle English Dictionary. As it\n is difficult to establish for earlier periods whether people were blood relations, an investigation of cousin as\n a term of address needs to establish the relationship between addressor and addressee, as far as possible, from independent\n historical sources. This study is based on the use of the term cousin in letters, as this often provides precise\n information on the relationships of correspondents. This investigation documents the use of cousin from the\n thirteenth to the early-sixteenth century in all literate ranks of society and concludes that the royal use of\n cousin constitutes a relic of an earlier more widespread use.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinship or friendship?\",\"authors\":\"M. Häcker\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JHP.17005.HAC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The use of the word cousin as a term of address for non-relatives in late-medieval and\\n Renaissance English is well documented in letters between monarchs, but weak for other social groups in the standard dictionaries,\\n with one example each in the Oxford English Dictionary and the Middle English Dictionary. As it\\n is difficult to establish for earlier periods whether people were blood relations, an investigation of cousin as\\n a term of address needs to establish the relationship between addressor and addressee, as far as possible, from independent\\n historical sources. This study is based on the use of the term cousin in letters, as this often provides precise\\n information on the relationships of correspondents. This investigation documents the use of cousin from the\\n thirteenth to the early-sixteenth century in all literate ranks of society and concludes that the royal use of\\n cousin constitutes a relic of an earlier more widespread use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.17005.HAC\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.17005.HAC","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在中世纪晚期和文艺复兴时期的英语中,表兄弟(cousin)这个词作为称呼非亲属的术语在君主之间的信件中有很好的记载,但在标准词典中,其他社会群体中却很少使用,《牛津英语词典》和《中古英语词典》各有一个例子。由于早期很难确定人与人之间是否存在血缘关系,因此对表兄弟作为称呼的调查需要尽可能地从独立的历史资料中确定称呼者和被称呼者之间的关系。这项研究是基于信件中“表亲”一词的使用,因为这通常能提供通信者之间关系的精确信息。这项调查记录了从13世纪到16世纪早期所有有文化的社会阶层对cousin一词的使用,并得出结论,皇室对cousin一词的使用是早期更广泛使用的遗迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kinship or friendship?
The use of the word cousin as a term of address for non-relatives in late-medieval and Renaissance English is well documented in letters between monarchs, but weak for other social groups in the standard dictionaries, with one example each in the Oxford English Dictionary and the Middle English Dictionary. As it is difficult to establish for earlier periods whether people were blood relations, an investigation of cousin as a term of address needs to establish the relationship between addressor and addressee, as far as possible, from independent historical sources. This study is based on the use of the term cousin in letters, as this often provides precise information on the relationships of correspondents. This investigation documents the use of cousin from the thirteenth to the early-sixteenth century in all literate ranks of society and concludes that the royal use of cousin constitutes a relic of an earlier more widespread use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信