超越博斯托克:对LGBTQ+理论与实践的启示

Q1 Social Sciences

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10841806.2020.1840903

S. McCandless, Nicole M. Elias

{"title":"超越博斯托克:对LGBTQ+理论与实践的启示","authors":"S. McCandless, Nicole M. Elias","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2020.1840903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County is a landmark piece of case law that offers fundamental rights to LGBT persons. This essay reflects on how this case arrived at the Supreme Court and its implications for theory and praxis. The overall conclusion is that cautious optimism is warranted.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"43 1","pages":"1 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2020.1840903","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Bostock: Implications for LGBTQ+ theory and practice\",\"authors\":\"S. McCandless, Nicole M. Elias\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10841806.2020.1840903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County is a landmark piece of case law that offers fundamental rights to LGBT persons. This essay reflects on how this case arrived at the Supreme Court and its implications for theory and praxis. The overall conclusion is that cautious optimism is warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative Theory and Praxis\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2020.1840903\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative Theory and Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1840903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1840903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

最近，美国最高法院对博斯托克诉克莱顿县一案的裁决是一个具有里程碑意义的判例法，为LGBT群体提供了基本权利。这篇文章反映了这个案件是如何到达最高法院的，以及它对理论和实践的影响。总的结论是，谨慎乐观是有理由的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Beyond Bostock: Implications for LGBTQ+ theory and practice

Abstract The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County is a landmark piece of case law that offers fundamental rights to LGBT persons. This essay reflects on how this case arrived at the Supreme Court and its implications for theory and praxis. The overall conclusion is that cautious optimism is warranted.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Administrative Theory and Praxis Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量