{"title":"菲利普·布朗伯格知道他在治疗Did吗？重要吗？","authors":"R. Chefetz","doi":"10.1080/00107530.2022.2143643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Initially informed by concepts related to dissociative experience via the notion of Sullivan’s ‘not-me’ (1953), Philip Bromberg went on to craft a relational psychoanalysis built upon the foundation of a multiple self-state theory of mind that grew from his discussions with Stephen Mitchell and also from his attention to the literature and treatment of dissociative identity disorder (DID). Although he never claimed to be treating DID, the reader is invited to form their own opinion about the reach of Bromberg’s work. Additional concepts related to Bromberg’s perspectives, such as “relational traumatology” and the notion of the “participant-witness,” are briefly explored. Clinical vignettes illustrate these concepts.","PeriodicalId":46058,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","volume":"58 1","pages":"310 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did Philip Bromberg Know He Was Treating DID? Does It Matter?\",\"authors\":\"R. Chefetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00107530.2022.2143643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Initially informed by concepts related to dissociative experience via the notion of Sullivan’s ‘not-me’ (1953), Philip Bromberg went on to craft a relational psychoanalysis built upon the foundation of a multiple self-state theory of mind that grew from his discussions with Stephen Mitchell and also from his attention to the literature and treatment of dissociative identity disorder (DID). Although he never claimed to be treating DID, the reader is invited to form their own opinion about the reach of Bromberg’s work. Additional concepts related to Bromberg’s perspectives, such as “relational traumatology” and the notion of the “participant-witness,” are briefly explored. Clinical vignettes illustrate these concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"310 - 320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2022.2143643\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2022.2143643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Philip Bromberg最初通过Sullivan的“非我”(1953)概念了解了与分离体验相关的概念，他在与Stephen Mitchell的讨论以及对分离性身份障碍(DID)的文献和治疗的关注中发展出了多重自我状态心理理论，并在此基础上建立了关系精神分析。尽管他从未声称自己在治疗DID，但读者可以就布朗伯格的研究范围形成自己的看法。与Bromberg的观点相关的其他概念，如“关系创伤学”和“参与者-证人”的概念，被简要探讨。临床小品说明了这些概念。
Did Philip Bromberg Know He Was Treating DID? Does It Matter?
Abstract Initially informed by concepts related to dissociative experience via the notion of Sullivan’s ‘not-me’ (1953), Philip Bromberg went on to craft a relational psychoanalysis built upon the foundation of a multiple self-state theory of mind that grew from his discussions with Stephen Mitchell and also from his attention to the literature and treatment of dissociative identity disorder (DID). Although he never claimed to be treating DID, the reader is invited to form their own opinion about the reach of Bromberg’s work. Additional concepts related to Bromberg’s perspectives, such as “relational traumatology” and the notion of the “participant-witness,” are briefly explored. Clinical vignettes illustrate these concepts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
