单个股票的回报是可预测的吗?

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Hui Zeng, Ben R. Marshall, N. Nguyen, Nuttawat Visaltanachoti
{"title":"单个股票的回报是可预测的吗?","authors":"Hui Zeng, Ben R. Marshall, N. Nguyen, Nuttawat Visaltanachoti","doi":"10.1177/03128962211001509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that the previously documented predictability of macroeconomic and technical variables for market returns is also evident in individual stock returns. Technical variables generate better predictability on firms with high limits to arbitrage (small, illiquid, volatile firms), while macroeconomic variables better predict firms with low limits to arbitrage. Technical predictors show a stronger predictive power for high limits to arbitrage firms across the business cycle, whereas macroeconomic variables capture more predictive information for firms with low limits to arbitrage during recessions. JEL Classification: C58, E32, G11, G12, G17","PeriodicalId":47209,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Management","volume":"47 1","pages":"135 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/03128962211001509","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are individual stock returns predictable?\",\"authors\":\"Hui Zeng, Ben R. Marshall, N. Nguyen, Nuttawat Visaltanachoti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03128962211001509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We show that the previously documented predictability of macroeconomic and technical variables for market returns is also evident in individual stock returns. Technical variables generate better predictability on firms with high limits to arbitrage (small, illiquid, volatile firms), while macroeconomic variables better predict firms with low limits to arbitrage. Technical predictors show a stronger predictive power for high limits to arbitrage firms across the business cycle, whereas macroeconomic variables capture more predictive information for firms with low limits to arbitrage during recessions. JEL Classification: C58, E32, G11, G12, G17\",\"PeriodicalId\":47209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"135 - 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/03128962211001509\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962211001509\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962211001509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们表明,先前记录的宏观经济和技术变量对市场回报的可预测性在个股回报中也很明显。技术变量对套利限制高的公司(小的、非流动性的、不稳定的公司)产生更好的可预测性,而宏观经济变量更好地预测套利限制低的公司。技术预测指标对整个商业周期中套利上限较高的公司具有更强的预测能力,而宏观经济变量对经济衰退期间套利上限较低的公司具有更强的预测能力。JEL分类:C58、E32、G11、G12、G17
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are individual stock returns predictable?
We show that the previously documented predictability of macroeconomic and technical variables for market returns is also evident in individual stock returns. Technical variables generate better predictability on firms with high limits to arbitrage (small, illiquid, volatile firms), while macroeconomic variables better predict firms with low limits to arbitrage. Technical predictors show a stronger predictive power for high limits to arbitrage firms across the business cycle, whereas macroeconomic variables capture more predictive information for firms with low limits to arbitrage during recessions. JEL Classification: C58, E32, G11, G12, G17
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The objectives of the Australian Journal of Management are to encourage and publish research in the field of management. The terms management and research are both broadly defined. The former includes the management of firms, groups, industries, regulatory bodies, government, and other institutions. The latter encompasses both discipline- and problem-based research. Consistent with the policy, the Australian Journal of Management publishes research in accounting, applied economics, finance, industrial relations, political science, psychology, statistics, and other disciplines, provided the application is to management, as well as research in areas such as marketing, corporate strategy, operations management, organisation development, decision analysis, and other problem-focuses paradigms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信