《日本的生活政治:草根行动与民主危机》作者:Tessa Morris-Suzuki(书评)

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
M. Haddad
{"title":"《日本的生活政治:草根行动与民主危机》作者:Tessa Morris-Suzuki(书评)","authors":"M. Haddad","doi":"10.1353/mni.2022.0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and, on the other hand, the economic rise that led to the bubble era. Although a work of history, Igarashi’s project speaks to a much broader audience including but not limited to scholars interested in cultural studies, mass media, gender issues, and sociological change. It adroitly illuminates the dramatic transformation of people’s sensibilities, daily lives, and understanding of their nation and their place in it. As a cultural studies scholar interested in the ongoing (re)construction of gender, I wished there had been some more sustained engagement in the book with the notions and contextualization of “masculinity” (versus men) specific to Japan during this time and in the specific texts. Igarashi’s unspooling of how the entrenchment of consumer culture precipitated a variety of insecurities that were captured, confronted, and reimagined in popular media is strong and sound. Still, a few well-placed interrogations of the negotiation of masculine identity within entrenched and transforming patriarchal norms—specifically, of how those norms were inextricably linked to imagined, assumed, and socially sanctioned power—would have brought the study more explicitly in line with its title. That said, Igarashi clearly presumes the constructedness of gender and demonstrates both that men dominated the spaces of cultural production and that “the defense of male identity was a central concern of the critical imagination” as they found their former roles and expectations changing faster than they could accommodate (p. 6). In this volume, Igarashi brings together, in carefully articulated and thoughtful readings, things that might on the face of the matter seem unrelated. He highlights cultural production and lived history, both mundane (domesticity and danchi) and monstrous (torture and murder). It is hard to do justice to all the details of the book in this brief review. I urge the reader to read and reread Igarashi’s thought-provoking chapters, which parse and clarify the effects of mass consumerism and new visual modes, media, and experiences. Japan, 1972 goes a long way toward explaining the tropes and national imagery that have shaped Japan into the powerful global economic and cultural force it is today.","PeriodicalId":54069,"journal":{"name":"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA","volume":"77 1","pages":"374 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Japan's Living Politics: Grassroots Action and the Crises of Democracy by Tessa Morris-Suzuki (review)\",\"authors\":\"M. Haddad\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mni.2022.0064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"and, on the other hand, the economic rise that led to the bubble era. Although a work of history, Igarashi’s project speaks to a much broader audience including but not limited to scholars interested in cultural studies, mass media, gender issues, and sociological change. It adroitly illuminates the dramatic transformation of people’s sensibilities, daily lives, and understanding of their nation and their place in it. As a cultural studies scholar interested in the ongoing (re)construction of gender, I wished there had been some more sustained engagement in the book with the notions and contextualization of “masculinity” (versus men) specific to Japan during this time and in the specific texts. Igarashi’s unspooling of how the entrenchment of consumer culture precipitated a variety of insecurities that were captured, confronted, and reimagined in popular media is strong and sound. Still, a few well-placed interrogations of the negotiation of masculine identity within entrenched and transforming patriarchal norms—specifically, of how those norms were inextricably linked to imagined, assumed, and socially sanctioned power—would have brought the study more explicitly in line with its title. That said, Igarashi clearly presumes the constructedness of gender and demonstrates both that men dominated the spaces of cultural production and that “the defense of male identity was a central concern of the critical imagination” as they found their former roles and expectations changing faster than they could accommodate (p. 6). In this volume, Igarashi brings together, in carefully articulated and thoughtful readings, things that might on the face of the matter seem unrelated. He highlights cultural production and lived history, both mundane (domesticity and danchi) and monstrous (torture and murder). It is hard to do justice to all the details of the book in this brief review. I urge the reader to read and reread Igarashi’s thought-provoking chapters, which parse and clarify the effects of mass consumerism and new visual modes, media, and experiences. Japan, 1972 goes a long way toward explaining the tropes and national imagery that have shaped Japan into the powerful global economic and cultural force it is today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"374 - 378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mni.2022.0064\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mni.2022.0064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

另一方面,导致泡沫时代的经济崛起。Igarashi的项目虽然是一部历史作品,但面向的受众要广泛得多,包括但不限于对文化研究、大众媒体、性别问题和社会学变革感兴趣的学者。它巧妙地阐明了人们的情感、日常生活以及对国家及其地位的理解的戏剧性转变。作为一名对正在进行的性别建构感兴趣的文化研究学者,我希望这本书在这段时间和具体的文本中能更持久地融入日本特有的“男子气概”(相对于男性)的概念和语境。Igarashi对消费者文化的根深蒂固如何引发各种不安全感的解读是强烈而合理的,这些不安全感在大众媒体中被捕捉、面对和重新想象。尽管如此,在根深蒂固和不断变化的父权制规范中,对男性身份的协商——特别是这些规范如何与想象、假设和社会认可的权力密不可分——进行一些恰当的质疑,会使这项研究更明确地符合其标题。也就是说,Igarashi清楚地假设了性别的结构性,并证明了男性主导了文化生产的空间,以及“捍卫男性身份是批判性想象力的核心问题”,因为他们发现自己以前的角色和期望变化得比他们所能适应的更快(第6页)。在这本书中,Igarashi以精心阐述和深思熟虑的阅读方式,将表面上看似无关的事情汇集在一起。他强调了文化生产和生活历史,既有世俗的(家庭生活和舞蹈),也有可怕的(酷刑和谋杀)。在这篇简短的评论中,很难公正地描述这本书的所有细节。我敦促读者反复阅读井原慎太郎发人深省的章节,这些章节解析并阐明了大众消费主义和新的视觉模式、媒体和体验的影响。1972年的《日本》在很大程度上解释了将日本塑造成今天强大的全球经济和文化力量的比喻和国家形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Japan's Living Politics: Grassroots Action and the Crises of Democracy by Tessa Morris-Suzuki (review)
and, on the other hand, the economic rise that led to the bubble era. Although a work of history, Igarashi’s project speaks to a much broader audience including but not limited to scholars interested in cultural studies, mass media, gender issues, and sociological change. It adroitly illuminates the dramatic transformation of people’s sensibilities, daily lives, and understanding of their nation and their place in it. As a cultural studies scholar interested in the ongoing (re)construction of gender, I wished there had been some more sustained engagement in the book with the notions and contextualization of “masculinity” (versus men) specific to Japan during this time and in the specific texts. Igarashi’s unspooling of how the entrenchment of consumer culture precipitated a variety of insecurities that were captured, confronted, and reimagined in popular media is strong and sound. Still, a few well-placed interrogations of the negotiation of masculine identity within entrenched and transforming patriarchal norms—specifically, of how those norms were inextricably linked to imagined, assumed, and socially sanctioned power—would have brought the study more explicitly in line with its title. That said, Igarashi clearly presumes the constructedness of gender and demonstrates both that men dominated the spaces of cultural production and that “the defense of male identity was a central concern of the critical imagination” as they found their former roles and expectations changing faster than they could accommodate (p. 6). In this volume, Igarashi brings together, in carefully articulated and thoughtful readings, things that might on the face of the matter seem unrelated. He highlights cultural production and lived history, both mundane (domesticity and danchi) and monstrous (torture and murder). It is hard to do justice to all the details of the book in this brief review. I urge the reader to read and reread Igarashi’s thought-provoking chapters, which parse and clarify the effects of mass consumerism and new visual modes, media, and experiences. Japan, 1972 goes a long way toward explaining the tropes and national imagery that have shaped Japan into the powerful global economic and cultural force it is today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MONUMENTA NIPPONICA
MONUMENTA NIPPONICA ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Monumenta Nipponica was founded in 1938 by Sophia University, Tokyo, to provide a common platform for scholars throughout the world to present their research on Japanese culture, history, literature, and society. One of the oldest and most highly regarded English-language journals in the Asian studies field, it is known not only for articles of original scholarship and timely book reviews, but also for authoritative translations of a wide range of Japanese historical and literary sources. Previously published four times a year, since 2008 the journal has appeared semiannually, in May and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信