维多利亚·克罗斯笔下安娜·伦巴第的跨种族性欲与杂烩

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jina Moon
{"title":"维多利亚·克罗斯笔下安娜·伦巴第的跨种族性欲与杂烩","authors":"Jina Moon","doi":"10.1080/00497878.2022.2148104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Victoria Cross’s (Annie Sophie Cory) fourth and most successful novel Anna Lombard (1901) portrays interracial sexual desire and miscegenation in the British Indian Empire during the late 1800s. The eponymous protagonist is a white Englishwoman whose secret marriage to a dark-skinned Pathan husband and their mixed-race progeny complicate an English officer’s goal of marrying and attaining ideal domesticity with her. Along with anxieties about the Other throughout the British territories, the fear of degeneration and, in particular, miscegenation dominated fin-de-siècle England. Within this historical framework, Cross daringly describes the interracial coupling of a white woman and a native man – a relationship that blurs racial hierarchies crucial for maintaining an empire. Furthermore, in an apparent rejection of English masculinity, the novel depicts an Englishman’s failure in a courtship competition with an (alleged) “savage.” These scandalous and outrageous portrayals of racial relations and gender reversals – commonly, British men had sexual relations with native women and were in control of English women – are unprecedented in either male or female Victorian authors’ literature. This essay argues that Cross’s unique identity as a woman born and raised in India with Anglo-Saxon blood and an English education positioned her in an ambivalent state of hybridity, ideal for bringing an insider’s knowledge of India and England to both cultures. As an AngloIndian woman, Cross was placed in the ambiguous position of both an imperial agent and a subordinate woman. Her own twofold life enabled her to critique not only British stereotypes of Others but also the racial hegemony and the sexual double standards imposed, in particular, upon white women in the imperial colonies. In the process, this essay further argues that Cross expanded upon the New Woman rhetoric – commonly considered pro-imperialistic – by bringing in a criticism of British imperialism, providing an opportunity to overcome racial blindness and to unite beyond race, class, and gender. In the imperial context in which sexuality served as","PeriodicalId":45212,"journal":{"name":"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interracial Sexual Desire and Miscegenation in Victoria Cross’s Anna Lombard\",\"authors\":\"Jina Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00497878.2022.2148104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Victoria Cross’s (Annie Sophie Cory) fourth and most successful novel Anna Lombard (1901) portrays interracial sexual desire and miscegenation in the British Indian Empire during the late 1800s. The eponymous protagonist is a white Englishwoman whose secret marriage to a dark-skinned Pathan husband and their mixed-race progeny complicate an English officer’s goal of marrying and attaining ideal domesticity with her. Along with anxieties about the Other throughout the British territories, the fear of degeneration and, in particular, miscegenation dominated fin-de-siècle England. Within this historical framework, Cross daringly describes the interracial coupling of a white woman and a native man – a relationship that blurs racial hierarchies crucial for maintaining an empire. Furthermore, in an apparent rejection of English masculinity, the novel depicts an Englishman’s failure in a courtship competition with an (alleged) “savage.” These scandalous and outrageous portrayals of racial relations and gender reversals – commonly, British men had sexual relations with native women and were in control of English women – are unprecedented in either male or female Victorian authors’ literature. This essay argues that Cross’s unique identity as a woman born and raised in India with Anglo-Saxon blood and an English education positioned her in an ambivalent state of hybridity, ideal for bringing an insider’s knowledge of India and England to both cultures. As an AngloIndian woman, Cross was placed in the ambiguous position of both an imperial agent and a subordinate woman. Her own twofold life enabled her to critique not only British stereotypes of Others but also the racial hegemony and the sexual double standards imposed, in particular, upon white women in the imperial colonies. In the process, this essay further argues that Cross expanded upon the New Woman rhetoric – commonly considered pro-imperialistic – by bringing in a criticism of British imperialism, providing an opportunity to overcome racial blindness and to unite beyond race, class, and gender. In the imperial context in which sexuality served as\",\"PeriodicalId\":45212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2022.2148104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2022.2148104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维多利亚·克罗斯(安妮·索菲·科里饰)的第四部也是最成功的小说《安娜·隆巴德》(1901年)描绘了19世纪末英属印度帝国的跨种族性欲和通婚。同名主人公是一位英国白人女性,她与深色皮肤的帕坦丈夫及其混血后代的秘密婚姻使一位英国军官与她结婚并实现理想家庭生活的目标复杂化。在整个英国领土上,除了对他者的焦虑之外,对堕落的恐惧,尤其是对异族通婚的恐惧,主宰了整个英格兰。在这个历史框架内,克罗斯大胆地描述了白人女性和土著男性的跨种族结合——这种关系模糊了对维持帝国至关重要的种族等级制度。此外,这部小说明显拒绝了英国人的男子气概,描绘了一个英国人在与一个(所谓的)“野蛮人”的求爱竞争中失败,英国男性与本土女性发生性关系,并控制着英国女性——这在维多利亚时代的男性或女性作家的文学中都是前所未有的。这篇文章认为,克罗斯是一位在印度出生和长大的女性,有着盎格鲁撒克逊血统,受过英国教育,她的独特身份使她处于一种矛盾的混合状态,非常适合将内部人士对印度和英国的了解带到这两种文化中。作为一名英国-印度女性,克罗斯被置于帝国特工和下属女性的模糊地位。她自己的双重生活使她不仅能批判英国人对他人的刻板印象,还能批判种族霸权和性双重标准,尤其是对帝国殖民地白人女性的双重标准。在这个过程中,本文进一步认为,克罗斯扩展了新女性的修辞——通常被认为是亲帝国主义的——引入了对英国帝国主义的批评,为克服种族盲目性和超越种族、阶级和性别团结提供了机会。在性作为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interracial Sexual Desire and Miscegenation in Victoria Cross’s Anna Lombard
Victoria Cross’s (Annie Sophie Cory) fourth and most successful novel Anna Lombard (1901) portrays interracial sexual desire and miscegenation in the British Indian Empire during the late 1800s. The eponymous protagonist is a white Englishwoman whose secret marriage to a dark-skinned Pathan husband and their mixed-race progeny complicate an English officer’s goal of marrying and attaining ideal domesticity with her. Along with anxieties about the Other throughout the British territories, the fear of degeneration and, in particular, miscegenation dominated fin-de-siècle England. Within this historical framework, Cross daringly describes the interracial coupling of a white woman and a native man – a relationship that blurs racial hierarchies crucial for maintaining an empire. Furthermore, in an apparent rejection of English masculinity, the novel depicts an Englishman’s failure in a courtship competition with an (alleged) “savage.” These scandalous and outrageous portrayals of racial relations and gender reversals – commonly, British men had sexual relations with native women and were in control of English women – are unprecedented in either male or female Victorian authors’ literature. This essay argues that Cross’s unique identity as a woman born and raised in India with Anglo-Saxon blood and an English education positioned her in an ambivalent state of hybridity, ideal for bringing an insider’s knowledge of India and England to both cultures. As an AngloIndian woman, Cross was placed in the ambiguous position of both an imperial agent and a subordinate woman. Her own twofold life enabled her to critique not only British stereotypes of Others but also the racial hegemony and the sexual double standards imposed, in particular, upon white women in the imperial colonies. In the process, this essay further argues that Cross expanded upon the New Woman rhetoric – commonly considered pro-imperialistic – by bringing in a criticism of British imperialism, providing an opportunity to overcome racial blindness and to unite beyond race, class, and gender. In the imperial context in which sexuality served as
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL
WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信