Mustafa Bajraktari, Blerim Arapi, G. Huti, Asead Abdyli, R. Domi
{"title":"麻黄素输注联合抢救麻黄素与单独抢救麻黄素预防剖宫产腰麻期间低血压的比较。","authors":"Mustafa Bajraktari, Blerim Arapi, G. Huti, Asead Abdyli, R. Domi","doi":"10.32391/ajtes.v7i1.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Maternal hypotension is an unwanted consequence of the physiologic onset of spinal blockade, and causes both maternal and fetal effects. Maternal symptoms include nausea, vomiting, and a sense of ‘‘impending doom’’ from inadequate cerebral perfusion. Inadequate treatment of hypotension can ultimately end with the loss of consciousness and cardiovascular collapse. \nMaterials and methods: We included 80 full term parturient (ASA I or II) with uncomplicated pregnancies. The patients were prospectively randomized into two groups. 80 patients received 1000 mL NaCl 0,9 % solution before the initiation of spinal anesthesia. Maternal systolic blood pressure was measured every 1 minutes (for first 10 minutes) and then every 3 minutes. One group received ephedrine infusion (1 mg/min) with rescue ephedrine boluses (10 mg), (usually defined as a maternal blood pressure ˂ 30% above baseline), (40 patients) and the other received rescue boluses alone (10 mg) , (usually defined as a maternal blood pressure ˂ 30% above baseline), (40 patients). \nResults: Gr 1 (Ephedrine infusion with rescue ephedrine boluses). The incidence of hypotension was at 8 patients (8/40 [20%]),(when an absolute value of less than 90 mmHg). \nGr 2 (rescue boluses ephedrine alone). The incidence of hypotension was at 32 patients (32/40 [80%]), (when an absolute value of less than 90 mmHg). \nGroup 2 had a higher incidence of hypotension compared with group 1 (32/40 [80%]) vs (8/40 [20%]). \nNeonatal outcomes were not different between the 2 groups. \nConclusion: Prophylactic variable rate ephedrine infusion and rescue ephedrine bolus dosing is more effective than relying on rescue ephedrine bolus dosing with respect to limiting clinician workload and maternal symptoms during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.Maternal hypotension","PeriodicalId":32905,"journal":{"name":"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ephedrine Infusion with Rescue Ephedrine Boluses versus Rescue Boluses alone for Preventing Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Bajraktari, Blerim Arapi, G. Huti, Asead Abdyli, R. Domi\",\"doi\":\"10.32391/ajtes.v7i1.315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Maternal hypotension is an unwanted consequence of the physiologic onset of spinal blockade, and causes both maternal and fetal effects. Maternal symptoms include nausea, vomiting, and a sense of ‘‘impending doom’’ from inadequate cerebral perfusion. Inadequate treatment of hypotension can ultimately end with the loss of consciousness and cardiovascular collapse. \\nMaterials and methods: We included 80 full term parturient (ASA I or II) with uncomplicated pregnancies. The patients were prospectively randomized into two groups. 80 patients received 1000 mL NaCl 0,9 % solution before the initiation of spinal anesthesia. Maternal systolic blood pressure was measured every 1 minutes (for first 10 minutes) and then every 3 minutes. One group received ephedrine infusion (1 mg/min) with rescue ephedrine boluses (10 mg), (usually defined as a maternal blood pressure ˂ 30% above baseline), (40 patients) and the other received rescue boluses alone (10 mg) , (usually defined as a maternal blood pressure ˂ 30% above baseline), (40 patients). \\nResults: Gr 1 (Ephedrine infusion with rescue ephedrine boluses). The incidence of hypotension was at 8 patients (8/40 [20%]),(when an absolute value of less than 90 mmHg). \\nGr 2 (rescue boluses ephedrine alone). The incidence of hypotension was at 32 patients (32/40 [80%]), (when an absolute value of less than 90 mmHg). \\nGroup 2 had a higher incidence of hypotension compared with group 1 (32/40 [80%]) vs (8/40 [20%]). \\nNeonatal outcomes were not different between the 2 groups. \\nConclusion: Prophylactic variable rate ephedrine infusion and rescue ephedrine bolus dosing is more effective than relying on rescue ephedrine bolus dosing with respect to limiting clinician workload and maternal symptoms during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.Maternal hypotension\",\"PeriodicalId\":32905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32391/ajtes.v7i1.315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32391/ajtes.v7i1.315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:母体低血压是脊髓阻滞生理性发作的不良后果,并引起母体和胎儿的影响。产妇的症状包括恶心、呕吐和脑灌注不足造成的“末日来临”感。对低血压治疗不当最终会导致意识丧失和心血管衰竭。材料和方法:我们纳入了80例无并发症妊娠的足月产妇(ASA I或II)。这些患者被前瞻性地随机分为两组。80例患者在开始脊髓麻醉前给予1000 mL NaCl 0.9%溶液。产妇收缩压每1分钟测量一次(前10分钟),然后每3分钟测量一次。一组患者接受麻黄碱输注(1mg /min),同时给予麻黄碱救援丸(10mg)(通常定义为孕妇血压比基线高小于30%),(40例);另一组患者单独接受麻黄碱救援丸(10mg)(通常定义为孕妇血压比基线高小于30%),(40例)。结果:Gr 1(麻黄碱输注配合抢救麻黄碱丸)。低血压发生率为8例(8/40[20%]),(当绝对值小于90 mmHg时)。第2组(单独使用麻黄碱)。低血压发生率为32例(32/40[80%]),(当绝对值小于90 mmHg时)。2组低血压发生率高于1组(32/40 [80%]vs(8/40[20%])。两组新生儿结局无差异。结论:在限制剖宫产腰麻期间临床医生工作量和产妇症状方面,预防性麻黄素可变速率输注和救援麻黄素小丸比依赖救援麻黄素小丸更有效。产妇低血压
Ephedrine Infusion with Rescue Ephedrine Boluses versus Rescue Boluses alone for Preventing Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.
Background: Maternal hypotension is an unwanted consequence of the physiologic onset of spinal blockade, and causes both maternal and fetal effects. Maternal symptoms include nausea, vomiting, and a sense of ‘‘impending doom’’ from inadequate cerebral perfusion. Inadequate treatment of hypotension can ultimately end with the loss of consciousness and cardiovascular collapse.
Materials and methods: We included 80 full term parturient (ASA I or II) with uncomplicated pregnancies. The patients were prospectively randomized into two groups. 80 patients received 1000 mL NaCl 0,9 % solution before the initiation of spinal anesthesia. Maternal systolic blood pressure was measured every 1 minutes (for first 10 minutes) and then every 3 minutes. One group received ephedrine infusion (1 mg/min) with rescue ephedrine boluses (10 mg), (usually defined as a maternal blood pressure ˂ 30% above baseline), (40 patients) and the other received rescue boluses alone (10 mg) , (usually defined as a maternal blood pressure ˂ 30% above baseline), (40 patients).
Results: Gr 1 (Ephedrine infusion with rescue ephedrine boluses). The incidence of hypotension was at 8 patients (8/40 [20%]),(when an absolute value of less than 90 mmHg).
Gr 2 (rescue boluses ephedrine alone). The incidence of hypotension was at 32 patients (32/40 [80%]), (when an absolute value of less than 90 mmHg).
Group 2 had a higher incidence of hypotension compared with group 1 (32/40 [80%]) vs (8/40 [20%]).
Neonatal outcomes were not different between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: Prophylactic variable rate ephedrine infusion and rescue ephedrine bolus dosing is more effective than relying on rescue ephedrine bolus dosing with respect to limiting clinician workload and maternal symptoms during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.Maternal hypotension