教师对化学反应的误解与学习

Kåre Haugan, A. Holand
{"title":"教师对化学反应的误解与学习","authors":"Kåre Haugan, A. Holand","doi":"10.5617/NORDINA.8134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study has addressed misconceptions and the learning process of chemical reactions. 14 student teachersperformed a written test consisting of 28 multiple choice questions and after participating in fivechemistry classes the students were interviewed individually focusing on misconceptions and experiencedlearning events. Several misconceptions and hindrances for the learning of chemical reactions were identified.Some of these are previously identified, but two were more surprising; Three out of 13 studentswere confused when switching between the terms chemical “reaction” and chemical “change”, a confusiongenerated by a chemistry textbook. In addition, one student mixed up the symbolic meaning of theletter “C” in NaCl to C for the element carbon. Another student learned the profound difference betweentwo states of a substance when the symbols (aq) and (l) were used to differ between “dissolved in water”and “liquid”. Finally, the students identified dialogue and laboratory work as important for their learningof chemical reactions.","PeriodicalId":37114,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies in Science Education","volume":"17 1","pages":"79-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lærerstudenters misoppfatninger og læring om kjemiske reaksjoner\",\"authors\":\"Kåre Haugan, A. Holand\",\"doi\":\"10.5617/NORDINA.8134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study has addressed misconceptions and the learning process of chemical reactions. 14 student teachersperformed a written test consisting of 28 multiple choice questions and after participating in fivechemistry classes the students were interviewed individually focusing on misconceptions and experiencedlearning events. Several misconceptions and hindrances for the learning of chemical reactions were identified.Some of these are previously identified, but two were more surprising; Three out of 13 studentswere confused when switching between the terms chemical “reaction” and chemical “change”, a confusiongenerated by a chemistry textbook. In addition, one student mixed up the symbolic meaning of theletter “C” in NaCl to C for the element carbon. Another student learned the profound difference betweentwo states of a substance when the symbols (aq) and (l) were used to differ between “dissolved in water”and “liquid”. Finally, the students identified dialogue and laboratory work as important for their learningof chemical reactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Studies in Science Education\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"79-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Studies in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5617/NORDINA.8134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/NORDINA.8134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究解决了误解和化学反应的学习过程。14名学生教师进行了一项由28道选择题组成的笔试,在参加了5节化学课后,学生们分别接受了采访,重点是误解和经历的学习事件。指出了学习化学反应的几个误解和障碍。其中一些是以前发现的,但有两个更令人惊讶;13名学生中有3人在化学“反应”和化学“变化”这两个词之间转换时感到困惑,这是一本化学教科书造成的困惑。此外,一名学生将NaCl中字母“C”的象征意义混淆为碳元素的C。另一名学生在用(aq)和(l)符号来区分“溶解在水中”和“液体”时,了解了物质两种状态之间的深刻差异。最后,学生们认为对话和实验室工作对他们学习化学反应很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lærerstudenters misoppfatninger og læring om kjemiske reaksjoner
This study has addressed misconceptions and the learning process of chemical reactions. 14 student teachersperformed a written test consisting of 28 multiple choice questions and after participating in fivechemistry classes the students were interviewed individually focusing on misconceptions and experiencedlearning events. Several misconceptions and hindrances for the learning of chemical reactions were identified.Some of these are previously identified, but two were more surprising; Three out of 13 studentswere confused when switching between the terms chemical “reaction” and chemical “change”, a confusiongenerated by a chemistry textbook. In addition, one student mixed up the symbolic meaning of theletter “C” in NaCl to C for the element carbon. Another student learned the profound difference betweentwo states of a substance when the symbols (aq) and (l) were used to differ between “dissolved in water”and “liquid”. Finally, the students identified dialogue and laboratory work as important for their learningof chemical reactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Studies in Science Education
Nordic Studies in Science Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信