{"title":"等式对检测治疗效果的影响","authors":"Youn-Jeng Choi, Seohyun Kim, A. Cohen, Zhenqiu Lu","doi":"10.22237/JMASM/1559653467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equating makes it possible to compare performances on different forms of a test. Three different equating methods (baseline selection, subgroup, and subscore equating) using common-item item response theory equating were examined for their impact on detection of treatment effects in multilevel models.","PeriodicalId":47201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Equating on Detection of Treatment Effects\",\"authors\":\"Youn-Jeng Choi, Seohyun Kim, A. Cohen, Zhenqiu Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.22237/JMASM/1559653467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Equating makes it possible to compare performances on different forms of a test. Three different equating methods (baseline selection, subgroup, and subscore equating) using common-item item response theory equating were examined for their impact on detection of treatment effects in multilevel models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22237/JMASM/1559653467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22237/JMASM/1559653467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Equating on Detection of Treatment Effects
Equating makes it possible to compare performances on different forms of a test. Three different equating methods (baseline selection, subgroup, and subscore equating) using common-item item response theory equating were examined for their impact on detection of treatment effects in multilevel models.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods is an independent, peer-reviewed, open access journal designed to provide an outlet for the scholarly works of applied nonparametric or parametric statisticians, data analysts, researchers, classical or modern psychometricians, and quantitative or qualitative methodologists/evaluators.