国会大厦被攻破：集体行动社会学的视角

Q1 Social Sciences

Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/17467586.2021.1913507

David Schweingruber

{"title":"国会大厦被攻破：集体行动社会学的视角","authors":"David Schweingruber","doi":"10.1080/17467586.2021.1913507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The breach of the Capitol Building on 6 January 2021 was an unprecedented event in United States history, but the behaviour of the people on the Capitol grounds and inside the Capitol Building was consistent with the findings of sociological research on behaviour in riots and other temporary gatherings. This article describes key sociological findings and illustrates these with examples from the January 6 event. Myths about behaviour in temporary gatherings are also addressed.","PeriodicalId":38896,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17467586.2021.1913507","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Capitol breach: perspective from the Sociology of Collective Action\",\"authors\":\"David Schweingruber\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17467586.2021.1913507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The breach of the Capitol Building on 6 January 2021 was an unprecedented event in United States history, but the behaviour of the people on the Capitol grounds and inside the Capitol Building was consistent with the findings of sociological research on behaviour in riots and other temporary gatherings. This article describes key sociological findings and illustrates these with examples from the January 6 event. Myths about behaviour in temporary gatherings are also addressed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17467586.2021.1913507\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2021.1913507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2021.1913507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年1月6日的国会大厦闯入事件是美国历史上前所未有的事件，但国会大厦场地和国会大厦内人们的行为与骚乱和其他临时集会行为的社会学研究结果一致。本文描述了主要的社会学发现，并用1月6日事件中的例子来说明这些发现。关于临时聚会行为的误解也得到了解决。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Capitol breach: perspective from the Sociology of Collective Action

ABSTRACT The breach of the Capitol Building on 6 January 2021 was an unprecedented event in United States history, but the behaviour of the people on the Capitol grounds and inside the Capitol Building was consistent with the findings of sociological research on behaviour in riots and other temporary gatherings. This article describes key sociological findings and illustrates these with examples from the January 6 event. Myths about behaviour in temporary gatherings are also addressed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide Social Sciences-Cultural Studies

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量