[18F]FDG-PET/CT在革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性菌血症中的作用:系统综述

Alice Packham, Niamh Spence, Tanveer Bawa, Rohit Srinivasan, Anna L Goodman
{"title":"[18F]FDG-PET/CT在革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性菌血症中的作用:系统综述","authors":"Alice Packham, Niamh Spence, Tanveer Bawa, Rohit Srinivasan, Anna L Goodman","doi":"10.3389/fnume.2022.1066246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Bacteraemia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. [18F]FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used to detect infectious metastatic foci, however there remains international variation in its use. We performed a systematic review assessing the impact of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in adult inpatients with gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteraemia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 2009 and December 2021 were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane clinical trials database. Data extraction and quality assessment was performed using ROBINS-I and GRADE.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eligible study designs included randomised-controlled trials, clinically-controlled trials, prospective trials, retrospective trials, case-control studies, and non-controlled studies.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Studies solely assessing adult inpatients with blood-culture confirmed bacteraemia with one cohort of patients receiving [18F]FDG-PET/CT were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>primary outcomes were mortality, identification of metastatic foci and relapse rate. Studies not examining any of the pre-specified outcomes were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included, of which five had a non-PET/CT control arm. Overall, there was low quality of evidence that [18F]FDG-PET/CT is associated with reduced mortality, improved identification of metastatic foci and reduced relapse rate. Six studies assessed <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia (SAB) only; nine studies included Gram-positive bacteraemia only, and one study included data from Gram-negative bacteraemia. Two studies compared outcomes between patients with different types of bacteraemia. Four studies identified a statistically significant difference in mortality in [18F]FDG-PET/CT recipients and controls. Relapse rate was significantly reduced in patients with SAB who received [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Studies identified significantly higher detection of metastatic foci in [18F]FDG-PET/CT recipients compared to controls. [18F]FDG-PET/CT was the first to identify an infectious site in 35.5% to 67.2% of overall foci identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further research is required to establish the role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in bacteraemia, and its impact on management and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":73095,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteraemia: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Packham, Niamh Spence, Tanveer Bawa, Rohit Srinivasan, Anna L Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnume.2022.1066246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Bacteraemia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. [18F]FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used to detect infectious metastatic foci, however there remains international variation in its use. We performed a systematic review assessing the impact of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in adult inpatients with gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteraemia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 2009 and December 2021 were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane clinical trials database. Data extraction and quality assessment was performed using ROBINS-I and GRADE.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eligible study designs included randomised-controlled trials, clinically-controlled trials, prospective trials, retrospective trials, case-control studies, and non-controlled studies.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Studies solely assessing adult inpatients with blood-culture confirmed bacteraemia with one cohort of patients receiving [18F]FDG-PET/CT were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>primary outcomes were mortality, identification of metastatic foci and relapse rate. Studies not examining any of the pre-specified outcomes were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included, of which five had a non-PET/CT control arm. Overall, there was low quality of evidence that [18F]FDG-PET/CT is associated with reduced mortality, improved identification of metastatic foci and reduced relapse rate. Six studies assessed <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia (SAB) only; nine studies included Gram-positive bacteraemia only, and one study included data from Gram-negative bacteraemia. Two studies compared outcomes between patients with different types of bacteraemia. Four studies identified a statistically significant difference in mortality in [18F]FDG-PET/CT recipients and controls. Relapse rate was significantly reduced in patients with SAB who received [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Studies identified significantly higher detection of metastatic foci in [18F]FDG-PET/CT recipients compared to controls. [18F]FDG-PET/CT was the first to identify an infectious site in 35.5% to 67.2% of overall foci identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further research is required to establish the role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in bacteraemia, and its impact on management and mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440864/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2022.1066246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2022.1066246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的菌血症与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。[18F]FDG-PET/CT越来越多地用于检测感染性转移灶,但其使用仍存在国际差异。我们进行了一项系统综述,评估[18F]FDG-PET/CT对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性菌血症成年住院患者的影响。设计根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价。在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane临床试验数据库中检索2009年至2021年12月发表的研究。采用ROBINS-I和GRADE进行数据提取和质量评价。符合条件的研究设计包括随机对照试验、临床对照试验、前瞻性试验、回顾性试验、病例对照研究和非对照研究。研究纳入了单独评估血培养确诊菌血症的成年住院患者的研究,其中一组患者接受了[18F]FDG-PET/CT。主要结局指标主要结局为死亡率、转移灶的确定和复发率。未检查任何预先指定结果的研究被排除在外。结果纳入10项研究,其中5项有非pet /CT对照臂。总体而言,[18F]FDG-PET/CT与降低死亡率、提高转移灶的识别和降低复发率相关的证据质量较低。6项研究仅评估了金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB);9项研究仅包括革兰氏阳性菌血症,1项研究包括革兰氏阴性菌血症的数据。两项研究比较了不同类型菌血症患者的结果。四项研究发现,[18F]FDG-PET/CT受体与对照组的死亡率有统计学差异。SAB患者接受[18F]FDG-PET/CT治疗后复发率明显降低。研究发现,与对照组相比,[18F]FDG-PET/CT受体转移灶的检出率明显更高。[18F]FDG-PET/CT首先发现感染部位,占总病灶的35.5% ~ 67.2%。结论[18F]FDG-PET/CT在菌血症中的作用及其对治疗和死亡率的影响有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteraemia: A systematic review.

Objectives: Bacteraemia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. [18F]FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used to detect infectious metastatic foci, however there remains international variation in its use. We performed a systematic review assessing the impact of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in adult inpatients with gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteraemia.

Design: The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 2009 and December 2021 were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane clinical trials database. Data extraction and quality assessment was performed using ROBINS-I and GRADE.

Setting: Eligible study designs included randomised-controlled trials, clinically-controlled trials, prospective trials, retrospective trials, case-control studies, and non-controlled studies.

Participants: Studies solely assessing adult inpatients with blood-culture confirmed bacteraemia with one cohort of patients receiving [18F]FDG-PET/CT were included.

Main outcome measures: primary outcomes were mortality, identification of metastatic foci and relapse rate. Studies not examining any of the pre-specified outcomes were excluded.

Results: Ten studies were included, of which five had a non-PET/CT control arm. Overall, there was low quality of evidence that [18F]FDG-PET/CT is associated with reduced mortality, improved identification of metastatic foci and reduced relapse rate. Six studies assessed Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) only; nine studies included Gram-positive bacteraemia only, and one study included data from Gram-negative bacteraemia. Two studies compared outcomes between patients with different types of bacteraemia. Four studies identified a statistically significant difference in mortality in [18F]FDG-PET/CT recipients and controls. Relapse rate was significantly reduced in patients with SAB who received [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Studies identified significantly higher detection of metastatic foci in [18F]FDG-PET/CT recipients compared to controls. [18F]FDG-PET/CT was the first to identify an infectious site in 35.5% to 67.2% of overall foci identified.

Conclusions: Further research is required to establish the role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in bacteraemia, and its impact on management and mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信