(生态)民粹主义在路加福音中的模糊作用

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Kai Bosworth
{"title":"(生态)民粹主义在路加福音中的模糊作用","authors":"Kai Bosworth","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2023.2184575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The concept of “eco-populism” has been used by the political theorist Timothy Luke to designate the possibility of open-ended green political futures which might be constructed beyond the limited ecological imaginaries of technoscience, neoliberalism, and Marxism. This article interrogates the conceptual origins through which “eco-populism” became the preferred name for this alternative. Eco-populism is taken to rightly critique some of the class characteristics of ecological destruction, but it obscures their extension into the realms of reactionary politics, private property, and North American agrarian settler colonialism. This article develops an immanent critique of the formal limits of populism, while also demonstrating its historical formation in the US steers it away from more radical orientations towards climate justice.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"129 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ambiguous Role of (Eco)populism in the Work of Timothy Luke\",\"authors\":\"Kai Bosworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07393148.2023.2184575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The concept of “eco-populism” has been used by the political theorist Timothy Luke to designate the possibility of open-ended green political futures which might be constructed beyond the limited ecological imaginaries of technoscience, neoliberalism, and Marxism. This article interrogates the conceptual origins through which “eco-populism” became the preferred name for this alternative. Eco-populism is taken to rightly critique some of the class characteristics of ecological destruction, but it obscures their extension into the realms of reactionary politics, private property, and North American agrarian settler colonialism. This article develops an immanent critique of the formal limits of populism, while also demonstrating its historical formation in the US steers it away from more radical orientations towards climate justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Political Science\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2023.2184575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2023.2184575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

政治理论家蒂莫西·卢克(Timothy Luke)使用“生态民粹主义”(eco-populism)这一概念来指出一种开放式绿色政治未来的可能性,这种未来可能超越技术科学、新自由主义和马克思主义的有限生态想象。本文探讨了“生态民粹主义”成为这一选择的首选名称的概念起源。生态民粹主义被用来正确地批判生态破坏的一些阶级特征,但它掩盖了它们向反动政治、私有财产和北美农业移民殖民主义领域的延伸。本文对民粹主义的形式局限性进行了内在批判,同时也展示了其在美国的历史形成,使其远离更激进的气候正义取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ambiguous Role of (Eco)populism in the Work of Timothy Luke
Abstract The concept of “eco-populism” has been used by the political theorist Timothy Luke to designate the possibility of open-ended green political futures which might be constructed beyond the limited ecological imaginaries of technoscience, neoliberalism, and Marxism. This article interrogates the conceptual origins through which “eco-populism” became the preferred name for this alternative. Eco-populism is taken to rightly critique some of the class characteristics of ecological destruction, but it obscures their extension into the realms of reactionary politics, private property, and North American agrarian settler colonialism. This article develops an immanent critique of the formal limits of populism, while also demonstrating its historical formation in the US steers it away from more radical orientations towards climate justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信