pilon骨折后踝关节融合术的发生率及危险因素:回顾性分析

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Lauren E. Massey, Lasun O. Oladeji, E. Esposito, J. Cook, G. D. Della Rocca, B. Crist
{"title":"pilon骨折后踝关节融合术的发生率及危险因素:回顾性分析","authors":"Lauren E. Massey, Lasun O. Oladeji, E. Esposito, J. Cook, G. D. Della Rocca, B. Crist","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pilon fractures are associated with a high incidence of complications, yet there continues to be uncertainty regarding variables associated with adverse outcomes after pilon open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). This study sought to characterize the rate of arthrodesis and identify risk factors that increase the likelihood of ankle arthrodesis in patients with ORIF pilon fractures. Methods: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was conducted to identify patients who underwent ORIF of pilon fractures at an ACS Level I trauma center from 2005 to 2014. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively for patient demographics, comorbidities, fracture characteristics, associated injuries, mechanism of injury, and functional activity. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with arthrodesis. Results: 282 pilon fractures (279 patients) met inclusion criteria. There were 182 men and 97 women with an average age of 43.8±15.2 yr. Overall, 15 pilon fractures (5.3%) in six male patients and nine female patients were treated with an ankle arthrodesis an average of 1.73±5.15 yr after their initial injury. Following multivariable logistic regression analysis, age greater than 40 yr, tobacco use, and nonunion were identified as independent predictors of arthrodesis. Conclusions: This study found a number of patient-related factors associated with an increased risk of arthrodesis after a pilon fracture was sustained. Multivariable logistical analysis identified age greater than 40 yr, tobacco use, and nonunion as independent predictors of arthrodesis following pilon fracture ORIF. Level of Evidence: Level III","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"34 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and risk factors of ankle fusion after pilon fracture: a retrospective review\",\"authors\":\"Lauren E. Massey, Lasun O. Oladeji, E. Esposito, J. Cook, G. D. Della Rocca, B. Crist\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pilon fractures are associated with a high incidence of complications, yet there continues to be uncertainty regarding variables associated with adverse outcomes after pilon open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). This study sought to characterize the rate of arthrodesis and identify risk factors that increase the likelihood of ankle arthrodesis in patients with ORIF pilon fractures. Methods: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was conducted to identify patients who underwent ORIF of pilon fractures at an ACS Level I trauma center from 2005 to 2014. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively for patient demographics, comorbidities, fracture characteristics, associated injuries, mechanism of injury, and functional activity. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with arthrodesis. Results: 282 pilon fractures (279 patients) met inclusion criteria. There were 182 men and 97 women with an average age of 43.8±15.2 yr. Overall, 15 pilon fractures (5.3%) in six male patients and nine female patients were treated with an ankle arthrodesis an average of 1.73±5.15 yr after their initial injury. Following multivariable logistic regression analysis, age greater than 40 yr, tobacco use, and nonunion were identified as independent predictors of arthrodesis. Conclusions: This study found a number of patient-related factors associated with an increased risk of arthrodesis after a pilon fracture was sustained. Multivariable logistical analysis identified age greater than 40 yr, tobacco use, and nonunion as independent predictors of arthrodesis following pilon fracture ORIF. Level of Evidence: Level III\",\"PeriodicalId\":10732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"34 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Pilon骨折并发症发生率高,但与Pilon切开复位内固定术(ORIF)后不良结果相关的变量仍存在不确定性。本研究旨在确定ORIF-pilon骨折患者关节融合术的发生率,并确定增加踝关节融合术可能性的风险因素。方法:在机构审查委员会批准后,进行回顾性审查,以确定2005年至2014年在ACS一级创伤中心接受pilon骨折ORIF的患者。回顾性审查了医疗记录和射线照片中的患者人口统计学、合并症、骨折特征、相关损伤、损伤机制和功能活动。进行Logistic回归分析,以确定与关节融合术相关的危险因素。结果:282例pilon骨折(279例)符合纳入标准。共有182名男性和97名女性,平均年龄为43.8±15.2岁。总体而言,6名男性患者和9名女性患者的15处pilon骨折(5.3%)在初次受伤后平均1.73±5.15年接受了踝关节融合术。经过多变量逻辑回归分析,年龄大于40岁、吸烟和骨不连被确定为关节融合术的独立预测因素。结论:本研究发现许多患者相关因素与pilon骨折后关节融合术风险增加有关。多因素后勤分析确定年龄大于40岁、吸烟和骨不连是pilon骨折ORIF后关节融合术的独立预测因素。证据级别:三级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence and risk factors of ankle fusion after pilon fracture: a retrospective review
Background: Pilon fractures are associated with a high incidence of complications, yet there continues to be uncertainty regarding variables associated with adverse outcomes after pilon open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). This study sought to characterize the rate of arthrodesis and identify risk factors that increase the likelihood of ankle arthrodesis in patients with ORIF pilon fractures. Methods: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was conducted to identify patients who underwent ORIF of pilon fractures at an ACS Level I trauma center from 2005 to 2014. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively for patient demographics, comorbidities, fracture characteristics, associated injuries, mechanism of injury, and functional activity. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with arthrodesis. Results: 282 pilon fractures (279 patients) met inclusion criteria. There were 182 men and 97 women with an average age of 43.8±15.2 yr. Overall, 15 pilon fractures (5.3%) in six male patients and nine female patients were treated with an ankle arthrodesis an average of 1.73±5.15 yr after their initial injury. Following multivariable logistic regression analysis, age greater than 40 yr, tobacco use, and nonunion were identified as independent predictors of arthrodesis. Conclusions: This study found a number of patient-related factors associated with an increased risk of arthrodesis after a pilon fracture was sustained. Multivariable logistical analysis identified age greater than 40 yr, tobacco use, and nonunion as independent predictors of arthrodesis following pilon fracture ORIF. Level of Evidence: Level III
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信