检验什么对参与少年司法系统的高风险青少年有效:比较九年期间社区联系(CC)计划与强化监督缓刑(ISP)的效果

Erin M. Espinosa, D. Sass, Johanna Creswell Báez, Cassandra Harper
{"title":"检验什么对参与少年司法系统的高风险青少年有效:比较九年期间社区联系(CC)计划与强化监督缓刑(ISP)的效果","authors":"Erin M. Espinosa, D. Sass, Johanna Creswell Báez, Cassandra Harper","doi":"10.52935/20.51916.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using administrative data collected by an urban juvenile probation department between January 2007 and August 2016, this study compared the impact of the Community Connections (CC) program to a matched sample of youth who received intensive supervision probation (ISP) on six time-to-event variables (i.e., time to second program, detention, out-of-home placement, another offense, violation of court order, and days in program). The study included youth who were assigned to court-ordered post-adjudication community supervision and who were deemed to have a high risk of re-offending by the department’s risk and needs assessment. CC and ISP youth were matched using propensity score matching that created a final sample of 381 youth in each program. When examining the program effect of CC vs. ISP on the time-to-event variables the findings were mixed. However, across both programs, the analysis revealed that youth who\nremained in the programs longer and youth with a successful program discharge generally\nexperienced better long-term outcomes than their peers.","PeriodicalId":73606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied juvenile justice services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining What Works for High Risk Youth Involved in the Juvenile Justice System: Comparing the Effect of the Community Connections (CC) Program to Intensive Supervision Probation (ISP) Over A Nine-Year Time Period\",\"authors\":\"Erin M. Espinosa, D. Sass, Johanna Creswell Báez, Cassandra Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.52935/20.51916.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using administrative data collected by an urban juvenile probation department between January 2007 and August 2016, this study compared the impact of the Community Connections (CC) program to a matched sample of youth who received intensive supervision probation (ISP) on six time-to-event variables (i.e., time to second program, detention, out-of-home placement, another offense, violation of court order, and days in program). The study included youth who were assigned to court-ordered post-adjudication community supervision and who were deemed to have a high risk of re-offending by the department’s risk and needs assessment. CC and ISP youth were matched using propensity score matching that created a final sample of 381 youth in each program. When examining the program effect of CC vs. ISP on the time-to-event variables the findings were mixed. However, across both programs, the analysis revealed that youth who\\nremained in the programs longer and youth with a successful program discharge generally\\nexperienced better long-term outcomes than their peers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied juvenile justice services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied juvenile justice services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52935/20.51916.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied juvenile justice services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52935/20.51916.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用2007年1月至2016年8月期间城市未成年人缓刑监督管理部门收集的行政数据,本研究将社区联系(CC)计划与接受强化监督缓刑(ISP)的匹配样本在六个时间-事件变量(即第二个计划的时间、拘留、家庭外安置、另一次犯罪、违反法庭命令和计划天数)上的影响进行了比较。这项研究包括被指派接受法院命令的裁决后社区监督的年轻人,他们被司法部的风险和需求评估认为有很高的再次犯罪风险。CC和ISP青年使用倾向得分匹配进行匹配,在每个项目中创建了381名青年的最终样本。在研究CC与ISP对事件发生时间变量的程序影响时,发现喜忧参半。然而,在这两个项目中,分析显示,年轻人在项目中嫖娼的时间更长,项目成功出院的年轻人通常比同龄人经历了更好的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining What Works for High Risk Youth Involved in the Juvenile Justice System: Comparing the Effect of the Community Connections (CC) Program to Intensive Supervision Probation (ISP) Over A Nine-Year Time Period
Using administrative data collected by an urban juvenile probation department between January 2007 and August 2016, this study compared the impact of the Community Connections (CC) program to a matched sample of youth who received intensive supervision probation (ISP) on six time-to-event variables (i.e., time to second program, detention, out-of-home placement, another offense, violation of court order, and days in program). The study included youth who were assigned to court-ordered post-adjudication community supervision and who were deemed to have a high risk of re-offending by the department’s risk and needs assessment. CC and ISP youth were matched using propensity score matching that created a final sample of 381 youth in each program. When examining the program effect of CC vs. ISP on the time-to-event variables the findings were mixed. However, across both programs, the analysis revealed that youth who remained in the programs longer and youth with a successful program discharge generally experienced better long-term outcomes than their peers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信