罗马世界中的伦敦。多米尼克·佩林著。233毫米。Pp xix+573,90 b/w图,制表符。牛津大学出版社,2022年。为98701987890000英镑。40英镑(hbk)。

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
B. Watson
{"title":"罗马世界中的伦敦。多米尼克·佩林著。233毫米。Pp xix+573,90 b/w图,制表符。牛津大学出版社,2022年。为98701987890000英镑。40英镑(hbk)。","authors":"B. Watson","doi":"10.1017/S0003581522000051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Just as sculptors came from Gaul to work in Bath stone, surely it is possible that a Gaulish or Gaulish-trained bronze worker cast the Bath statue in situ. The remarkable images of deities generally published as being from the corners of the main altar, but with affinities to the Viergötterstein from the Rhineland, may well be part of some other monument, as Cousins suggests, an idea first proposed, I think, by our late Fellow, Tom Blagg. Other sculptures are equated with local dedications from other places in the Cotswold region of south-west Britain. Dedications to the Suleviae at both Bath and Chichester by a sculptor called Sulinus and the identical style and epigraphy inscribed on tablets by one Docili(a)nus at both Bath and Uley reveal not only an individual intent on bothering the gods, but connectivity and pilgrimage within the province and, indeed, beyond, as is implied by Solinus’s mention of what can only be coal being burnt on the altar of Minerva’s temple at Bath. While there is somuch to admire in Cousins’s work, Davenport gains in his descriptions of the actual archaeology of the structures as well as in fairly lavish use of colour. He inevitably builds on Barry Cunliffe’s Roman Bath Discovered published twenty years ago (Cunliffe ), but more has been discovered since and of particular importance is a raft of masonry to the east of the temple court, which he interprets as a theatre on the same magnificent scale as the baths. It will require a chance to excavate in the area of the putative cavea to prove it. If so, either the blocks identified as from a tholos will have to have been sited elsewhere, or they were, indeed, part of the ornamentation of the theatre. Also of great interest has been the excavation of houses; whether or not Bath is best described as a sanctuary, it developed urban features, including houses with mosaic floors. Of especial interest is the very rare discovery bust of a woman, unfortunately now headless, carved in local stone and found in a second-century house excavated in Hat and Feather Yard; it presumably came from a house shrine and is indicative of the Romanitas of the owner. The sanctuary certainly required many people to service it, and that meant dwelling places, guest houses, shops and cemeteries for the dead – and beyond the urban area Bath was ringed by suburban villas. Many exciting discoveries have been made in Bath, including the enormous Beau Street hoard of coins deposited in the late third century and never recovered. In short, both of these books are to be warmly commended as valuable contributions not just to the study of Roman Britain but to Classical archaeology in general.","PeriodicalId":44308,"journal":{"name":"Antiquaries Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"London in the Roman World. By Dominic Perring. 233mm. Pp xix + 573, 90 b/w figs, tabs. Oxford University Press, 2022. isbn 9870198789000. £40 (hbk).\",\"authors\":\"B. Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0003581522000051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Just as sculptors came from Gaul to work in Bath stone, surely it is possible that a Gaulish or Gaulish-trained bronze worker cast the Bath statue in situ. The remarkable images of deities generally published as being from the corners of the main altar, but with affinities to the Viergötterstein from the Rhineland, may well be part of some other monument, as Cousins suggests, an idea first proposed, I think, by our late Fellow, Tom Blagg. Other sculptures are equated with local dedications from other places in the Cotswold region of south-west Britain. Dedications to the Suleviae at both Bath and Chichester by a sculptor called Sulinus and the identical style and epigraphy inscribed on tablets by one Docili(a)nus at both Bath and Uley reveal not only an individual intent on bothering the gods, but connectivity and pilgrimage within the province and, indeed, beyond, as is implied by Solinus’s mention of what can only be coal being burnt on the altar of Minerva’s temple at Bath. While there is somuch to admire in Cousins’s work, Davenport gains in his descriptions of the actual archaeology of the structures as well as in fairly lavish use of colour. He inevitably builds on Barry Cunliffe’s Roman Bath Discovered published twenty years ago (Cunliffe ), but more has been discovered since and of particular importance is a raft of masonry to the east of the temple court, which he interprets as a theatre on the same magnificent scale as the baths. It will require a chance to excavate in the area of the putative cavea to prove it. If so, either the blocks identified as from a tholos will have to have been sited elsewhere, or they were, indeed, part of the ornamentation of the theatre. Also of great interest has been the excavation of houses; whether or not Bath is best described as a sanctuary, it developed urban features, including houses with mosaic floors. Of especial interest is the very rare discovery bust of a woman, unfortunately now headless, carved in local stone and found in a second-century house excavated in Hat and Feather Yard; it presumably came from a house shrine and is indicative of the Romanitas of the owner. The sanctuary certainly required many people to service it, and that meant dwelling places, guest houses, shops and cemeteries for the dead – and beyond the urban area Bath was ringed by suburban villas. Many exciting discoveries have been made in Bath, including the enormous Beau Street hoard of coins deposited in the late third century and never recovered. In short, both of these books are to be warmly commended as valuable contributions not just to the study of Roman Britain but to Classical archaeology in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiquaries Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiquaries Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581522000051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquaries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581522000051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如雕塑家们从高卢来到巴斯石头厂工作一样,肯定有可能是一位高卢人或受过高卢训练的青铜工人在原地铸造了巴斯雕像。正如考辛斯所建议的那样,这些引人注目的神像通常被公布为来自主祭坛的角落,但与莱茵兰的维耶格斯坦有着密切的关系,很可能是其他纪念碑的一部分,我认为这是我们已故的同事汤姆·布拉格首次提出的想法。其他雕塑等同于英国西南部科茨沃尔德地区其他地方的当地奉献。一位名叫苏利努斯的雕塑家在巴斯和奇切斯特对苏莱维亚的供奉,以及一位在巴斯和乌利的Docili(a)nus在石碑上刻下的相同风格和金石学,不仅揭示了一个想要打扰众神的个人意图,还揭示了该省内外的联系和朝圣,正如Solinus提到的那样,在巴斯的Minerva神庙祭坛上只能燃烧煤炭。虽然考辛斯的作品中有很多值得钦佩的地方,但达文波特对建筑实际考古的描述以及对色彩的大量使用都有所收获。他不可避免地以巴里·坎利夫二十年前出版的《发现的罗马浴场》为基础(坎利夫), 但自那以后,人们发现了更多的东西,尤其重要的是寺庙庭院以东的一排砖石建筑,他将其解释为一个与浴场规模相同的剧院。需要有机会在假定的洞穴区域进行挖掘才能证明这一点。如果是这样的话,要么被确认为来自托洛斯的区块必须位于其他地方,要么它们确实是剧院装饰的一部分。同样令人感兴趣的是挖掘房屋;无论巴斯是否被最好地描述为一个避难所,它都发展了城市特色,包括马赛克地板的房子。特别令人感兴趣的是一尊罕见的女性半身像,不幸的是,这尊半身像现在是无头的,用当地的石头雕刻而成,在帽羽院挖掘的一座二世纪的房子里发现;据推测,它来自一座房屋神龛,象征着主人的罗马尼塔斯。这个避难所当然需要很多人来为它服务,这意味着死者的住所、招待所、商店和墓地——在市区之外,巴斯被郊区别墅包围。巴斯有许多令人兴奋的发现,包括三世纪末存放在博街的大量硬币,这些硬币从未被发现。简言之,这两本书都应该受到热烈的赞扬,因为它们不仅对罗马不列颠的研究,而且对整个古典考古学都做出了宝贵的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
London in the Roman World. By Dominic Perring. 233mm. Pp xix + 573, 90 b/w figs, tabs. Oxford University Press, 2022. isbn 9870198789000. £40 (hbk).
Just as sculptors came from Gaul to work in Bath stone, surely it is possible that a Gaulish or Gaulish-trained bronze worker cast the Bath statue in situ. The remarkable images of deities generally published as being from the corners of the main altar, but with affinities to the Viergötterstein from the Rhineland, may well be part of some other monument, as Cousins suggests, an idea first proposed, I think, by our late Fellow, Tom Blagg. Other sculptures are equated with local dedications from other places in the Cotswold region of south-west Britain. Dedications to the Suleviae at both Bath and Chichester by a sculptor called Sulinus and the identical style and epigraphy inscribed on tablets by one Docili(a)nus at both Bath and Uley reveal not only an individual intent on bothering the gods, but connectivity and pilgrimage within the province and, indeed, beyond, as is implied by Solinus’s mention of what can only be coal being burnt on the altar of Minerva’s temple at Bath. While there is somuch to admire in Cousins’s work, Davenport gains in his descriptions of the actual archaeology of the structures as well as in fairly lavish use of colour. He inevitably builds on Barry Cunliffe’s Roman Bath Discovered published twenty years ago (Cunliffe ), but more has been discovered since and of particular importance is a raft of masonry to the east of the temple court, which he interprets as a theatre on the same magnificent scale as the baths. It will require a chance to excavate in the area of the putative cavea to prove it. If so, either the blocks identified as from a tholos will have to have been sited elsewhere, or they were, indeed, part of the ornamentation of the theatre. Also of great interest has been the excavation of houses; whether or not Bath is best described as a sanctuary, it developed urban features, including houses with mosaic floors. Of especial interest is the very rare discovery bust of a woman, unfortunately now headless, carved in local stone and found in a second-century house excavated in Hat and Feather Yard; it presumably came from a house shrine and is indicative of the Romanitas of the owner. The sanctuary certainly required many people to service it, and that meant dwelling places, guest houses, shops and cemeteries for the dead – and beyond the urban area Bath was ringed by suburban villas. Many exciting discoveries have been made in Bath, including the enormous Beau Street hoard of coins deposited in the late third century and never recovered. In short, both of these books are to be warmly commended as valuable contributions not just to the study of Roman Britain but to Classical archaeology in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antiquaries Journal
Antiquaries Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信