{"title":"苏格拉底在多大程度上是道德理智主义者?重温柏拉图的《普罗泰戈拉》","authors":"R. Zaborowski","doi":"10.1353/acl.2021.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Socrates' ethical position is commonly classified as moral intellectualism. In this paper I argue against such a classification because in my view it is too narrow. First, I briefly recall traditional and less orthodox readings of Socrates' view. Then I analyse the passages of the Protagoras relevant to Socrates' position. Next, I focus on the multifariousness of the words know and knowledge and on a range of concepts of knowledge. Finally, I suggest that a more comprehensive reading of Socrates' position is accurate. I conclude by reformulating Socrates' position and suggesting a new way to describe it.","PeriodicalId":41891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Classica","volume":"64 1","pages":"263 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To what extent was Socrates a moral intellectualist? Revisiting Plato's Protagoras\",\"authors\":\"R. Zaborowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/acl.2021.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Socrates' ethical position is commonly classified as moral intellectualism. In this paper I argue against such a classification because in my view it is too narrow. First, I briefly recall traditional and less orthodox readings of Socrates' view. Then I analyse the passages of the Protagoras relevant to Socrates' position. Next, I focus on the multifariousness of the words know and knowledge and on a range of concepts of knowledge. Finally, I suggest that a more comprehensive reading of Socrates' position is accurate. I conclude by reformulating Socrates' position and suggesting a new way to describe it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Classica\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"263 - 290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Classica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/acl.2021.0019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/acl.2021.0019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
To what extent was Socrates a moral intellectualist? Revisiting Plato's Protagoras
ABSTRACT:Socrates' ethical position is commonly classified as moral intellectualism. In this paper I argue against such a classification because in my view it is too narrow. First, I briefly recall traditional and less orthodox readings of Socrates' view. Then I analyse the passages of the Protagoras relevant to Socrates' position. Next, I focus on the multifariousness of the words know and knowledge and on a range of concepts of knowledge. Finally, I suggest that a more comprehensive reading of Socrates' position is accurate. I conclude by reformulating Socrates' position and suggesting a new way to describe it.