潘卡西拉在意识形态后的时代

W. D. Putro
{"title":"潘卡西拉在意识形态后的时代","authors":"W. D. Putro","doi":"10.25123/VEJ.3233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is considered axiomatic that Pancasila has been accepted as State ideology (formally and final) and in addition been perceived as the ultimate source of all legal sources. But this acceptance as axiom leads to the fact that Pancasila has almost never been reflected upon. This said in consideration that the basis for this ideology, the contemporary society tends to be suspicious of ideology or grand narratives.  This article, as a reflective-critical analysis, shall discuss how Pancasila is understood by the Indonesian post ideological society. The critiques put forward is meant to offer an alternative value transformation for a society disillusioned by grand narratives.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PANCASILA DI ERA PASKA IDEOLOGI\",\"authors\":\"W. D. Putro\",\"doi\":\"10.25123/VEJ.3233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is considered axiomatic that Pancasila has been accepted as State ideology (formally and final) and in addition been perceived as the ultimate source of all legal sources. But this acceptance as axiom leads to the fact that Pancasila has almost never been reflected upon. This said in consideration that the basis for this ideology, the contemporary society tends to be suspicious of ideology or grand narratives.  This article, as a reflective-critical analysis, shall discuss how Pancasila is understood by the Indonesian post ideological society. The critiques put forward is meant to offer an alternative value transformation for a society disillusioned by grand narratives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veritas et Justitia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veritas et Justitia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25123/VEJ.3233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veritas et Justitia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25123/VEJ.3233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

Pancasila已被接受为国家意识形态(正式和最终),并且被视为所有法律来源的最终来源,这被认为是不言自明的。但这种作为公理的接受导致了一个事实,即潘卡西拉几乎从未被反思过。考虑到这种意识形态的基础,当代社会倾向于对意识形态或宏大叙事持怀疑态度。本文将作为一种反思批判的分析,探讨印尼后意识形态社会如何理解潘卡西拉。这些批评意在为一个对宏大叙事感到幻灭的社会提供另一种价值转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PANCASILA DI ERA PASKA IDEOLOGI
It is considered axiomatic that Pancasila has been accepted as State ideology (formally and final) and in addition been perceived as the ultimate source of all legal sources. But this acceptance as axiom leads to the fact that Pancasila has almost never been reflected upon. This said in consideration that the basis for this ideology, the contemporary society tends to be suspicious of ideology or grand narratives.  This article, as a reflective-critical analysis, shall discuss how Pancasila is understood by the Indonesian post ideological society. The critiques put forward is meant to offer an alternative value transformation for a society disillusioned by grand narratives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信