曲折的时间

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Joe Weiss
{"title":"曲折的时间","authors":"Joe Weiss","doi":"10.7227/jbr.8.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the works of James Baldwin and Jean Améry, a\n survivor of the Jewish Holocaust. It attempts to unpack the ethical and\n political implications of their shared conception of the temporality of trauma.\n The experiences of the victim of anti-Semitism and the victim of anti-Black\n racism not only parallel one another, but their mutual incapacity to let go of\n the injustice of the past also generates a unique ethico-political response. The\n backward glance of the victim, the avowed incapacity to heal, as well as the\n phantasmatic desire to reverse time all guide this unique response. Instead of\n seeking forgiveness for the wrong done and declaring that all forms of\n resentment are illegitimate, Baldwin and Améry show us that channeling\n the revenge fantasy that so often attends the temporality of trauma is the\n material precondition of actually ending that trauma. This ultimately suggests\n that, for both thinkers, anything less than a new, revolutionary humanism\n equipped with an internationalist political project would betray the\n victims’ attempt to win back their dignity.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tortuous Time\",\"authors\":\"Joe Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/jbr.8.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article compares the works of James Baldwin and Jean Améry, a\\n survivor of the Jewish Holocaust. It attempts to unpack the ethical and\\n political implications of their shared conception of the temporality of trauma.\\n The experiences of the victim of anti-Semitism and the victim of anti-Black\\n racism not only parallel one another, but their mutual incapacity to let go of\\n the injustice of the past also generates a unique ethico-political response. The\\n backward glance of the victim, the avowed incapacity to heal, as well as the\\n phantasmatic desire to reverse time all guide this unique response. Instead of\\n seeking forgiveness for the wrong done and declaring that all forms of\\n resentment are illegitimate, Baldwin and Améry show us that channeling\\n the revenge fantasy that so often attends the temporality of trauma is the\\n material precondition of actually ending that trauma. This ultimately suggests\\n that, for both thinkers, anything less than a new, revolutionary humanism\\n equipped with an internationalist political project would betray the\\n victims’ attempt to win back their dignity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"James Baldwin Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"James Baldwin Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.8.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.8.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了詹姆斯·鲍德温和犹太大屠杀幸存者吉恩·阿姆萨里的作品。它试图解开他们关于创伤暂时性的共同概念的伦理和政治含义。反犹太主义受害者的经历和反黑人种族主义受害者的经历不仅彼此相似,而且他们都无法摆脱过去的不公正,这也产生了独特的伦理政治反应。对受害者的回望,承认自己没有治愈的能力,以及逆转时间的幻觉欲望,都引导着这种独特的反应。鲍德温和阿姆萨梅没有为所做的错事寻求宽恕,也没有宣称所有形式的怨恨都是非法的,而是向我们展示了,在短暂的创伤中经常出现的复仇幻想,是真正结束创伤的物质前提。这最终表明,对于这两位思想家来说,如果没有一种配备了国际主义政治计划的新的、革命性的人道主义,就会背叛受害者赢回尊严的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tortuous Time
This article compares the works of James Baldwin and Jean Améry, a survivor of the Jewish Holocaust. It attempts to unpack the ethical and political implications of their shared conception of the temporality of trauma. The experiences of the victim of anti-Semitism and the victim of anti-Black racism not only parallel one another, but their mutual incapacity to let go of the injustice of the past also generates a unique ethico-political response. The backward glance of the victim, the avowed incapacity to heal, as well as the phantasmatic desire to reverse time all guide this unique response. Instead of seeking forgiveness for the wrong done and declaring that all forms of resentment are illegitimate, Baldwin and Améry show us that channeling the revenge fantasy that so often attends the temporality of trauma is the material precondition of actually ending that trauma. This ultimately suggests that, for both thinkers, anything less than a new, revolutionary humanism equipped with an internationalist political project would betray the victims’ attempt to win back their dignity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
James Baldwin Review
James Baldwin Review Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信