权利的利益理论：仍然存在

IF 16.4 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI:10.1017/S1352325221000203

Visa A. J. Kurki

引用次数: 0

摘要

在最近的两篇论文中，马克·麦克布莱德(Mark McBride)攻击了权利的利益理论，既引入了新的论点，又声称利益理论家未能成功地转移戈帕尔·斯里尼瓦桑(Gopal Sreenivasan)早期的论点。这篇文章回应了麦克布莱德的所有批评，表明他们是错误的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

THE INTEREST THEORY OF RIGHTS: STILL STANDING

ABSTRACT In two recent papers, Mark McBride has attacked the interest theory of rights, both introducing new arguments and claiming that interest theorists have not successfully deflected Gopal Sreenivasan's earlier arguments. This essay replies to all of McBride's criticisms, showing them to be mistaken.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.