美国区域规划协会的现代性

IF 0.8 3区历史学 0 ARCHITECTURE

Planning Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI:10.1080/02665433.2023.2219184

P. Rowe

{"title":"美国区域规划协会的现代性","authors":"P. Rowe","doi":"10.1080/02665433.2023.2219184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To address the relative modernity and contemporaneity of the legacy of the Regional Planning Association of America (RPAA). its position between 1923 and 1933 is compared to ideas of regional planning over the past 100 years. In this regard members of the RPAA, such as Mumford, Stein, Wright and MacKay, were initially strongly influenced by Geddes's idea of a geomorphology of human spatial systems, which also influenced the New Deal Era. While the utopianism of the RPAA's thinking diminished over time, its practical idealism persisted. To paraphrase Friedmann and Weaver, in the fluctuations between ‘functionality' and ‘territorial integration' that occurred in regional planning, the RPAA's concern for humankind and nature has persisted into today's Anthropocene Era. In short, while the RPAA's legacy’s subsequent influence over regional planning has varied, its relevance to functional integration has been longer lasting than its adherence to territorial integration.","PeriodicalId":46569,"journal":{"name":"Planning Perspectives","volume":"38 1","pages":"831 - 833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The modernity of the Regional Planning Association of America\",\"authors\":\"P. Rowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02665433.2023.2219184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT To address the relative modernity and contemporaneity of the legacy of the Regional Planning Association of America (RPAA). its position between 1923 and 1933 is compared to ideas of regional planning over the past 100 years. In this regard members of the RPAA, such as Mumford, Stein, Wright and MacKay, were initially strongly influenced by Geddes's idea of a geomorphology of human spatial systems, which also influenced the New Deal Era. While the utopianism of the RPAA's thinking diminished over time, its practical idealism persisted. To paraphrase Friedmann and Weaver, in the fluctuations between ‘functionality' and ‘territorial integration' that occurred in regional planning, the RPAA's concern for humankind and nature has persisted into today's Anthropocene Era. In short, while the RPAA's legacy’s subsequent influence over regional planning has varied, its relevance to functional integration has been longer lasting than its adherence to territorial integration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planning Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"831 - 833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planning Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2023.2219184\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2023.2219184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:探讨美国区域规划协会(RPAA)遗产的相对现代性和当代性。它在1923年至1933年间的位置与过去100年的区域规划思想进行了比较。在这方面，RPAA的成员，如芒福德、斯坦、赖特和麦凯，最初受到格迪斯关于人类空间系统地貌学的观点的强烈影响，这也影响了新政时代。随着时间的推移，RPAA思想中的乌托邦主义逐渐消失，但它的实际理想主义却一直存在。套用弗里德曼和韦弗的话说，在区域规划中出现的“功能性”和“领土一体化”之间的波动中，RPAA对人类和自然的关注一直持续到今天的人类世时代。简而言之，尽管RPAA的遗产对区域规划的影响各不相同，但其与功能整合的相关性比其对领土整合的坚持要持久得多。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The modernity of the Regional Planning Association of America

ABSTRACT To address the relative modernity and contemporaneity of the legacy of the Regional Planning Association of America (RPAA). its position between 1923 and 1933 is compared to ideas of regional planning over the past 100 years. In this regard members of the RPAA, such as Mumford, Stein, Wright and MacKay, were initially strongly influenced by Geddes's idea of a geomorphology of human spatial systems, which also influenced the New Deal Era. While the utopianism of the RPAA's thinking diminished over time, its practical idealism persisted. To paraphrase Friedmann and Weaver, in the fluctuations between ‘functionality' and ‘territorial integration' that occurred in regional planning, the RPAA's concern for humankind and nature has persisted into today's Anthropocene Era. In short, while the RPAA's legacy’s subsequent influence over regional planning has varied, its relevance to functional integration has been longer lasting than its adherence to territorial integration.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Planning Perspectives Multiple-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Planning Perspectives is a peer-reviewed international journal of history, planning and the environment, publishing historical and prospective articles on many aspects of plan making and implementation. Subjects covered link the interest of those working in economic, social and political history, historical geography and historical sociology with those in the applied fields of public health, housing construction, architecture and town planning. The Journal has a substantial book review section, covering UK, North American and European literature.