急性护理物理治疗中标准化结果测量的感知和应用

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
Darby Smith, M. Furtado, Gregory Brusola
{"title":"急性护理物理治疗中标准化结果测量的感知和应用","authors":"Darby Smith, M. Furtado, Gregory Brusola","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the relationship between characteristics of acute care physical therapists (PTs) and use of standardized outcome measures (OMs); also describe the perceived barriers, facilitators, and resources to the use of OMs by PTs in the acute care setting. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to PTs who currently work, or have worked, in the adult acute care setting in the past 5 years. Separate quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed followed by triangulation of findings. Results: A convenience sample included 227 respondents. Most respondents (n = 159, 70%) reported using OMs. PTs with a clinical specialty used OMs significantly more (P = .041) than those without. No significant difference was found in the frequency of OM use between years of experience, entry-level degree, and primary patient population. The top barrier was lack of time (60%). The top facilitator was support from administration (81%). Themes generated for barriers, facilitators, and resources included lack of resources, setting specificity, patient population and acuity, objective data, facility support, and continuing education. Conclusions: Most acute care PTs reported using OMs, although a higher frequency was observed in those with a clinical specialty. This study presents opportunities to provide knowledge translation and resources to combat barriers to OM use in the acute care setting.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception and Utilization of Standardized Outcome Measures in Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"authors\":\"Darby Smith, M. Furtado, Gregory Brusola\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To assess the relationship between characteristics of acute care physical therapists (PTs) and use of standardized outcome measures (OMs); also describe the perceived barriers, facilitators, and resources to the use of OMs by PTs in the acute care setting. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to PTs who currently work, or have worked, in the adult acute care setting in the past 5 years. Separate quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed followed by triangulation of findings. Results: A convenience sample included 227 respondents. Most respondents (n = 159, 70%) reported using OMs. PTs with a clinical specialty used OMs significantly more (P = .041) than those without. No significant difference was found in the frequency of OM use between years of experience, entry-level degree, and primary patient population. The top barrier was lack of time (60%). The top facilitator was support from administration (81%). Themes generated for barriers, facilitators, and resources included lack of resources, setting specificity, patient population and acuity, objective data, facility support, and continuing education. Conclusions: Most acute care PTs reported using OMs, although a higher frequency was observed in those with a clinical specialty. This study presents opportunities to provide knowledge translation and resources to combat barriers to OM use in the acute care setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评估急性护理物理治疗师(PTs)的特征与标准化结果测量(OMs)的使用之间的关系;还描述了pt在急性护理环境中使用OMs的感知障碍、促进因素和资源。方法:对过去5年在成人急症护理机构工作或曾经工作过的PTs进行电子调查。分别进行定量和定性分析,然后对结果进行三角测量。结果:方便样本包括227名受访者。大多数受访者(n = 159, 70%)报告使用OMs。有临床专科的患者使用OMs的比例明显高于无临床专科的患者(P = 0.041)。使用OM的频率在经验年限、初级学位和主要患者人群之间没有显著差异。最大的障碍是缺乏时间(60%)。最大的促进因素是来自行政部门的支持(81%)。针对障碍、促进因素和资源产生的主题包括缺乏资源、设置特异性、患者群体和敏锐度、客观数据、设施支持和继续教育。结论:大多数急症护理PTs报告使用OMs,尽管在临床专科患者中观察到更高的频率。本研究提供了提供知识翻译和资源的机会,以克服在急性护理环境中使用OM的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perception and Utilization of Standardized Outcome Measures in Acute Care Physical Therapy
Purpose: To assess the relationship between characteristics of acute care physical therapists (PTs) and use of standardized outcome measures (OMs); also describe the perceived barriers, facilitators, and resources to the use of OMs by PTs in the acute care setting. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to PTs who currently work, or have worked, in the adult acute care setting in the past 5 years. Separate quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed followed by triangulation of findings. Results: A convenience sample included 227 respondents. Most respondents (n = 159, 70%) reported using OMs. PTs with a clinical specialty used OMs significantly more (P = .041) than those without. No significant difference was found in the frequency of OM use between years of experience, entry-level degree, and primary patient population. The top barrier was lack of time (60%). The top facilitator was support from administration (81%). Themes generated for barriers, facilitators, and resources included lack of resources, setting specificity, patient population and acuity, objective data, facility support, and continuing education. Conclusions: Most acute care PTs reported using OMs, although a higher frequency was observed in those with a clinical specialty. This study presents opportunities to provide knowledge translation and resources to combat barriers to OM use in the acute care setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信