基本社会动机与人格测量和生活史变量的相关性

Mana Moshkforoush
{"title":"基本社会动机与人格测量和生活史变量的相关性","authors":"Mana Moshkforoush","doi":"10.26443/msurj.v15i1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In response to the replication crisis in the field of psychology, the authors conduct a replication of the Neel et al. (2016) (1) study examining individual differences in fundamental social motives. Methods: Using the Fundamental Social Motives Inventory, we explore the relationships of the fundamental social motives to other individual differences and personality measures and the extent to which life history variables (e.g., age, sex, childhood environment) predict individual differences in the fundamental social motives. In addition to the replication study, the authors also incorporate the Behavioral Inhibition/Activation Scale (BIS/BAS) as a new variable to determine this measure of personality’s correlation with all seven fundamental social motives of Self-Protection, Disease Avoidance, Affiliation, Status, Mate Seeking, Mate Retention, and Kin Care. A total of 34 participants are recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk to complete the measures of personality under question. The replication criteria are set at ±0.15 r/β-units from the original study results and effect sizes greater than or equal to r/β=0.5 have to demonstrate statistical significance at the p<0.05 level.Results: Results demonstrate that between a third and a half of all effect sizes replicate Neel et al.’s (1) findings.Limitations: These results should be considered carefully with respect to the low sample size of our study.Conclusion: The BIS/BAS variable proves to be most informative, indicating that the seven motives cluster under either the BIS or BAS factors with medium to large strengths of correlation. These findings contribute to discussions on considering the most accurate measures of social motivation and the implications of individual differences in psychology’s understanding of such motivational systems.","PeriodicalId":91927,"journal":{"name":"McGill Science undergraduate research journal : MSURJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlations of Fundamental Social Motives with Personality Measures and Life History Variables\",\"authors\":\"Mana Moshkforoush\",\"doi\":\"10.26443/msurj.v15i1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In response to the replication crisis in the field of psychology, the authors conduct a replication of the Neel et al. (2016) (1) study examining individual differences in fundamental social motives. Methods: Using the Fundamental Social Motives Inventory, we explore the relationships of the fundamental social motives to other individual differences and personality measures and the extent to which life history variables (e.g., age, sex, childhood environment) predict individual differences in the fundamental social motives. In addition to the replication study, the authors also incorporate the Behavioral Inhibition/Activation Scale (BIS/BAS) as a new variable to determine this measure of personality’s correlation with all seven fundamental social motives of Self-Protection, Disease Avoidance, Affiliation, Status, Mate Seeking, Mate Retention, and Kin Care. A total of 34 participants are recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk to complete the measures of personality under question. The replication criteria are set at ±0.15 r/β-units from the original study results and effect sizes greater than or equal to r/β=0.5 have to demonstrate statistical significance at the p<0.05 level.Results: Results demonstrate that between a third and a half of all effect sizes replicate Neel et al.’s (1) findings.Limitations: These results should be considered carefully with respect to the low sample size of our study.Conclusion: The BIS/BAS variable proves to be most informative, indicating that the seven motives cluster under either the BIS or BAS factors with medium to large strengths of correlation. These findings contribute to discussions on considering the most accurate measures of social motivation and the implications of individual differences in psychology’s understanding of such motivational systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"McGill Science undergraduate research journal : MSURJ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"McGill Science undergraduate research journal : MSURJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26443/msurj.v15i1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill Science undergraduate research journal : MSURJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26443/msurj.v15i1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了应对心理学领域的复制危机,作者对Neel等人进行了复制。(2016)(1)研究考察了基本社会动机的个体差异。方法:使用基本社会动机量表,我们探讨了基本社会动机与其他个体差异和人格测量的关系,以及生活史变量(如年龄、性别、童年环境)对基本社会动机个体差异的预测程度。除了复制研究外,作者还将行为抑制/激活量表(BIS/BAS)作为一个新的变量,以确定这种人格与自我保护、疾病回避、依恋、地位、择偶、伴侣保留和亲属关怀这七个基本社会动机的相关性。共有34名参与者从亚马逊机械土耳其人招募来完成所讨论的人格测量。复制标准设定为原始研究结果的±0.15 r/β单位,大于或等于r/β=0.5的效应大小必须在p<0.05水平上显示出统计学意义。结果:结果表明,三分之一到一半的效果大小与Neel等人(1)的研究结果相同。局限性:鉴于我们研究的样本量较小,应仔细考虑这些结果。结论:BIS/BAS变量被证明是信息量最大的,表明七种动机在BIS或BAS因素下聚类,具有中到大的相关性。这些发现有助于讨论社会动机的最准确衡量标准,以及心理学对这种动机系统理解的个体差异的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlations of Fundamental Social Motives with Personality Measures and Life History Variables
Background: In response to the replication crisis in the field of psychology, the authors conduct a replication of the Neel et al. (2016) (1) study examining individual differences in fundamental social motives. Methods: Using the Fundamental Social Motives Inventory, we explore the relationships of the fundamental social motives to other individual differences and personality measures and the extent to which life history variables (e.g., age, sex, childhood environment) predict individual differences in the fundamental social motives. In addition to the replication study, the authors also incorporate the Behavioral Inhibition/Activation Scale (BIS/BAS) as a new variable to determine this measure of personality’s correlation with all seven fundamental social motives of Self-Protection, Disease Avoidance, Affiliation, Status, Mate Seeking, Mate Retention, and Kin Care. A total of 34 participants are recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk to complete the measures of personality under question. The replication criteria are set at ±0.15 r/β-units from the original study results and effect sizes greater than or equal to r/β=0.5 have to demonstrate statistical significance at the p<0.05 level.Results: Results demonstrate that between a third and a half of all effect sizes replicate Neel et al.’s (1) findings.Limitations: These results should be considered carefully with respect to the low sample size of our study.Conclusion: The BIS/BAS variable proves to be most informative, indicating that the seven motives cluster under either the BIS or BAS factors with medium to large strengths of correlation. These findings contribute to discussions on considering the most accurate measures of social motivation and the implications of individual differences in psychology’s understanding of such motivational systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信