像自然一样的艺术:蒂姆·斯普纳表演中的剧场环境

IF 0.4 0 THEATER
S. Bowes
{"title":"像自然一样的艺术:蒂姆·斯普纳表演中的剧场环境","authors":"S. Bowes","doi":"10.1515/jcde-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Tim Spooner has described his practice as “an increasingly complex series of live performances centred on the revelation of life in material.”1 In this article, I consider this revelation as the precondition of a theatre ecology. Spooner stages a theatrical encounter between bodies and environments, in which distinctions between person-thing, subject-object, self-other no longer hold. Whilst there are evident parallels between this practice and posthumanist, or new-materialist philosophy, I shall describe Spooner’s theatre as artlike.This article responds to two thematics outlined in the original call for papers for CDE 2021: “eco-spaces” and “eco-aesthetics.” The argument runs: 1) an ecological space is the result of an ecological aesthetics; theatre is considered fundamentally social, political in significance; art is fundamentally ecological in significance; 2) ecocritical theatre and theatre ecology are categorically distinct: in ecocriticism, political, social, and cultural concerns mediate a concern for nature; in a theatre ecology nature is reconstructed virtually; 3) ecocriticism stages a recognition of an ecological crisis in social terms; theatre ecology stages a revelation of an environment; 4) against theatre, there is legislation; 5) a theatre ecology extends a juxtapositional logic of political ecology: this is a false start and ill-timed.The argument leads to a reconstruction of three gestures drawn from three of Spooner’s performances. In these gestures, theatre is rendered artlike. The exposition describes Spooner’s practice in terms of embodiment and occupation, before considering how the ecological implications of an artlike theatre are, firstly and finally, ethical.","PeriodicalId":41187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Art Like Nature: Theatre Environment as Territory in Tim Spooner Performances\",\"authors\":\"S. Bowes\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jcde-2022-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Tim Spooner has described his practice as “an increasingly complex series of live performances centred on the revelation of life in material.”1 In this article, I consider this revelation as the precondition of a theatre ecology. Spooner stages a theatrical encounter between bodies and environments, in which distinctions between person-thing, subject-object, self-other no longer hold. Whilst there are evident parallels between this practice and posthumanist, or new-materialist philosophy, I shall describe Spooner’s theatre as artlike.This article responds to two thematics outlined in the original call for papers for CDE 2021: “eco-spaces” and “eco-aesthetics.” The argument runs: 1) an ecological space is the result of an ecological aesthetics; theatre is considered fundamentally social, political in significance; art is fundamentally ecological in significance; 2) ecocritical theatre and theatre ecology are categorically distinct: in ecocriticism, political, social, and cultural concerns mediate a concern for nature; in a theatre ecology nature is reconstructed virtually; 3) ecocriticism stages a recognition of an ecological crisis in social terms; theatre ecology stages a revelation of an environment; 4) against theatre, there is legislation; 5) a theatre ecology extends a juxtapositional logic of political ecology: this is a false start and ill-timed.The argument leads to a reconstruction of three gestures drawn from three of Spooner’s performances. In these gestures, theatre is rendered artlike. The exposition describes Spooner’s practice in terms of embodiment and occupation, before considering how the ecological implications of an artlike theatre are, firstly and finally, ethical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2022-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蒂姆·斯普纳(Tim Spooner)将他的实践描述为“一系列日益复杂的现场表演,以揭示物质中的生命为中心。在本文中,我认为这种启示是剧院生态的先决条件。斯普纳上演了一场身体与环境之间的戏剧性邂逅,在这场邂逅中,人-物、主体-客体、自我-他者之间的区别不再成立。虽然这种实践与后人类主义或新唯物主义哲学之间有明显的相似之处,但我将把斯普纳的戏剧描述为艺术。本文回应了CDE 2021最初征文中概述的两个主题:“生态空间”和“生态美学”。论证认为:1)生态空间是生态美学的产物;戏剧从根本上被认为具有社会和政治意义;艺术在本质上具有生态意义;2)生态批评戏剧和戏剧生态学是截然不同的:在生态批评中,政治、社会和文化关注调解了对自然的关注;在剧院中,生态自然被虚拟地重建;3)生态批评在社会层面上对生态危机的认识;剧场生态学是对一个环境的揭示;4)针对戏剧,有立法;戏剧生态学扩展了政治生态学的并置逻辑:这是一个错误的开始,不合时宜。这一论点导致了从斯普纳的三个表演中提取的三个手势的重建。在这些姿态中,戏剧被渲染得像艺术一样。在考虑艺术剧院的生态含义是如何首先和最终是伦理的之前,博览会从体现和职业的角度描述了斯普纳的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Art Like Nature: Theatre Environment as Territory in Tim Spooner Performances
Abstract Tim Spooner has described his practice as “an increasingly complex series of live performances centred on the revelation of life in material.”1 In this article, I consider this revelation as the precondition of a theatre ecology. Spooner stages a theatrical encounter between bodies and environments, in which distinctions between person-thing, subject-object, self-other no longer hold. Whilst there are evident parallels between this practice and posthumanist, or new-materialist philosophy, I shall describe Spooner’s theatre as artlike.This article responds to two thematics outlined in the original call for papers for CDE 2021: “eco-spaces” and “eco-aesthetics.” The argument runs: 1) an ecological space is the result of an ecological aesthetics; theatre is considered fundamentally social, political in significance; art is fundamentally ecological in significance; 2) ecocritical theatre and theatre ecology are categorically distinct: in ecocriticism, political, social, and cultural concerns mediate a concern for nature; in a theatre ecology nature is reconstructed virtually; 3) ecocriticism stages a recognition of an ecological crisis in social terms; theatre ecology stages a revelation of an environment; 4) against theatre, there is legislation; 5) a theatre ecology extends a juxtapositional logic of political ecology: this is a false start and ill-timed.The argument leads to a reconstruction of three gestures drawn from three of Spooner’s performances. In these gestures, theatre is rendered artlike. The exposition describes Spooner’s practice in terms of embodiment and occupation, before considering how the ecological implications of an artlike theatre are, firstly and finally, ethical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信