三级医疗中心各种人工晶状体度数计算公式在远视患者中的疗效研究

Kunjan Patel, Dipika Patel, Parth Dave
{"title":"三级医疗中心各种人工晶状体度数计算公式在远视患者中的疗效研究","authors":"Kunjan Patel, Dipika Patel, Parth Dave","doi":"10.4103/kjo.kjo_169_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Our study was conducted to evaluate and compare the predictive capacity of five intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK/T, HOFFERQ, HOLLADAY1, HAIGIS, BARRETT UNIVERSAL II) in eyes with axial length (AL) <22 mm. Subjects and Methods: In our study, 100 patients with a preoperative AL of <22 mm were included. All patients underwent uneventful cataract surgery with IOL implantation and postoperative target of refraction were analyzed after 40 days. The mean estimation error and mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated for each formula, and ANOVA test was applied to compare the differences in the MAEs of the formulas. A statistically significant difference was defined as P < 0.05. Results: A statistically significant difference was seen between Barrett Universal II formula in comparison to SRK/T formula. There was no statistically significant difference seen among the absolute error of all the five IOL power calculation formula groups. Conclusions: Among the formulas compared, Barrett Universal II formula is the most accurate in predicting postoperative refractive error in hyperopic patients. Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay 1 formula give better results than the commonly used SRK/T formula.","PeriodicalId":32483,"journal":{"name":"Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"35 1","pages":"72 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on efficacy of various formulas for intraocular lens power calculation in hyperopic patients at a tertiary care center\",\"authors\":\"Kunjan Patel, Dipika Patel, Parth Dave\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/kjo.kjo_169_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Our study was conducted to evaluate and compare the predictive capacity of five intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK/T, HOFFERQ, HOLLADAY1, HAIGIS, BARRETT UNIVERSAL II) in eyes with axial length (AL) <22 mm. Subjects and Methods: In our study, 100 patients with a preoperative AL of <22 mm were included. All patients underwent uneventful cataract surgery with IOL implantation and postoperative target of refraction were analyzed after 40 days. The mean estimation error and mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated for each formula, and ANOVA test was applied to compare the differences in the MAEs of the formulas. A statistically significant difference was defined as P < 0.05. Results: A statistically significant difference was seen between Barrett Universal II formula in comparison to SRK/T formula. There was no statistically significant difference seen among the absolute error of all the five IOL power calculation formula groups. Conclusions: Among the formulas compared, Barrett Universal II formula is the most accurate in predicting postoperative refractive error in hyperopic patients. Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay 1 formula give better results than the commonly used SRK/T formula.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/kjo.kjo_169_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/kjo.kjo_169_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的研究旨在评估和比较五种人工晶状体度数计算公式(SRK/T、HOFFERQ、HOLLAY1、HAIGIS、BARRETT UNIVERSAL II)对眼轴长度(AL)<22mm的预测能力。受试者和方法:在我们的研究中,包括100名术前AL<22mm的患者。所有患者均接受了平静的白内障人工晶状体植入术,并在40天后对术后屈光目标进行了分析。计算每个公式的平均估计误差和平均绝对误差(MAE),并应用ANOVA检验来比较公式的MAE差异。差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结果:与SRK/T配方奶粉相比,Barrett Universal II配方奶粉在统计学上存在显著差异。所有五个IOL屈光力计算公式组的绝对误差之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:在比较的公式中,Barrett Universal II公式在预测远视患者术后屈光不正方面最准确。Hoffer Q、Haigis和Holladay 1公式比常用的SRK/T公式给出了更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study on efficacy of various formulas for intraocular lens power calculation in hyperopic patients at a tertiary care center
Purpose: Our study was conducted to evaluate and compare the predictive capacity of five intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK/T, HOFFERQ, HOLLADAY1, HAIGIS, BARRETT UNIVERSAL II) in eyes with axial length (AL) <22 mm. Subjects and Methods: In our study, 100 patients with a preoperative AL of <22 mm were included. All patients underwent uneventful cataract surgery with IOL implantation and postoperative target of refraction were analyzed after 40 days. The mean estimation error and mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated for each formula, and ANOVA test was applied to compare the differences in the MAEs of the formulas. A statistically significant difference was defined as P < 0.05. Results: A statistically significant difference was seen between Barrett Universal II formula in comparison to SRK/T formula. There was no statistically significant difference seen among the absolute error of all the five IOL power calculation formula groups. Conclusions: Among the formulas compared, Barrett Universal II formula is the most accurate in predicting postoperative refractive error in hyperopic patients. Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay 1 formula give better results than the commonly used SRK/T formula.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信