{"title":"双针复位器辅助复位治疗GardenⅢ-Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折","authors":"Jie-chang Ren, Xin Lyu, Fei Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the efficacy between reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor and manual reduction in the treatment of femoral neck fractures of Garden types Ⅲ-Ⅳ. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom May 2015 to October 2017, 67 patients with femoral neck fracture of Garden type Ⅲ or Ⅳ were treated by hollow screw fixation at Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Shanxi Medical University. They were divided into 2 groups according to the different reduction methods. The reduction was assisted by a double-needle repositor in 37 cases (group A); they were 21 males and 16 females with an age of 46.2±8.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 24 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The reduction was conducted manually in another 30 cases (group B); they were 18 males and 12 females with an age of 48.8±9.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 17 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The 2 groups were compared in terms of reduction time, anatomical reduction rate, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fracture healing time, postoperative complications and Harris hip scores at the last follow-up. \n \n \nResults \nThere were no significant differences between the 2 groups of patients in their preoperative general data, indicating they were compatible(P>0.05). All the 67 patients were followed up for 20 to 30 months (average, 24 months). The anatomic reduction rate in group A [94.6% (35/37)] was significantly higher than that in group B [83.3% (25/30)]; the reduction time, operation time and fracture healing time in group A (33.2±4.6 min, 70.2±5.0 min and 4.6±0.7 months) were significantly shorter than those in group B (45.8±8.6 min, 90.6±9.2 min and 5.6±0.6 months); the Harris hip scores at the last follow-up in group A (84.3±8.6 points) were significantly higher than in group B (81.2±7.8 points) (all P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nReduction assisted by a double-needle repositor is fine for femoral neck fractures of Garden types of Ⅲ-Ⅳ, because it has advantages of limited invasion, simplicity, a high rate of anatomical reduction, quick reduction and good functional recovery. \n \n \nKey words: \nFemoral neck fractures; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone nails; Reduction; Double-needle repositor","PeriodicalId":10145,"journal":{"name":"中华创伤骨科杂志","volume":"21 1","pages":"758-763"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor for femoral neck fractures of Garden types III-IV\",\"authors\":\"Jie-chang Ren, Xin Lyu, Fei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the efficacy between reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor and manual reduction in the treatment of femoral neck fractures of Garden types Ⅲ-Ⅳ. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom May 2015 to October 2017, 67 patients with femoral neck fracture of Garden type Ⅲ or Ⅳ were treated by hollow screw fixation at Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Shanxi Medical University. They were divided into 2 groups according to the different reduction methods. The reduction was assisted by a double-needle repositor in 37 cases (group A); they were 21 males and 16 females with an age of 46.2±8.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 24 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The reduction was conducted manually in another 30 cases (group B); they were 18 males and 12 females with an age of 48.8±9.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 17 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The 2 groups were compared in terms of reduction time, anatomical reduction rate, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fracture healing time, postoperative complications and Harris hip scores at the last follow-up. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were no significant differences between the 2 groups of patients in their preoperative general data, indicating they were compatible(P>0.05). All the 67 patients were followed up for 20 to 30 months (average, 24 months). The anatomic reduction rate in group A [94.6% (35/37)] was significantly higher than that in group B [83.3% (25/30)]; the reduction time, operation time and fracture healing time in group A (33.2±4.6 min, 70.2±5.0 min and 4.6±0.7 months) were significantly shorter than those in group B (45.8±8.6 min, 90.6±9.2 min and 5.6±0.6 months); the Harris hip scores at the last follow-up in group A (84.3±8.6 points) were significantly higher than in group B (81.2±7.8 points) (all P 0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nReduction assisted by a double-needle repositor is fine for femoral neck fractures of Garden types of Ⅲ-Ⅳ, because it has advantages of limited invasion, simplicity, a high rate of anatomical reduction, quick reduction and good functional recovery. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nFemoral neck fractures; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone nails; Reduction; Double-needle repositor\",\"PeriodicalId\":10145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"758-763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.09.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华创伤骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.09.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor for femoral neck fractures of Garden types III-IV
Objective
To compare the efficacy between reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor and manual reduction in the treatment of femoral neck fractures of Garden types Ⅲ-Ⅳ.
Methods
From May 2015 to October 2017, 67 patients with femoral neck fracture of Garden type Ⅲ or Ⅳ were treated by hollow screw fixation at Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Shanxi Medical University. They were divided into 2 groups according to the different reduction methods. The reduction was assisted by a double-needle repositor in 37 cases (group A); they were 21 males and 16 females with an age of 46.2±8.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 24 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The reduction was conducted manually in another 30 cases (group B); they were 18 males and 12 females with an age of 48.8±9.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 17 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The 2 groups were compared in terms of reduction time, anatomical reduction rate, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fracture healing time, postoperative complications and Harris hip scores at the last follow-up.
Results
There were no significant differences between the 2 groups of patients in their preoperative general data, indicating they were compatible(P>0.05). All the 67 patients were followed up for 20 to 30 months (average, 24 months). The anatomic reduction rate in group A [94.6% (35/37)] was significantly higher than that in group B [83.3% (25/30)]; the reduction time, operation time and fracture healing time in group A (33.2±4.6 min, 70.2±5.0 min and 4.6±0.7 months) were significantly shorter than those in group B (45.8±8.6 min, 90.6±9.2 min and 5.6±0.6 months); the Harris hip scores at the last follow-up in group A (84.3±8.6 points) were significantly higher than in group B (81.2±7.8 points) (all P 0.05).
Conclusion
Reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor is fine for femoral neck fractures of Garden types of Ⅲ-Ⅳ, because it has advantages of limited invasion, simplicity, a high rate of anatomical reduction, quick reduction and good functional recovery.
Key words:
Femoral neck fractures; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone nails; Reduction; Double-needle repositor