双针复位器辅助复位治疗GardenⅢ-Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折

Q4 Medicine
Jie-chang Ren, Xin Lyu, Fei Li
{"title":"双针复位器辅助复位治疗GardenⅢ-Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折","authors":"Jie-chang Ren, Xin Lyu, Fei Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the efficacy between reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor and manual reduction in the treatment of femoral neck fractures of Garden types Ⅲ-Ⅳ. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom May 2015 to October 2017, 67 patients with femoral neck fracture of Garden type Ⅲ or Ⅳ were treated by hollow screw fixation at Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Shanxi Medical University. They were divided into 2 groups according to the different reduction methods. The reduction was assisted by a double-needle repositor in 37 cases (group A); they were 21 males and 16 females with an age of 46.2±8.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 24 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The reduction was conducted manually in another 30 cases (group B); they were 18 males and 12 females with an age of 48.8±9.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 17 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The 2 groups were compared in terms of reduction time, anatomical reduction rate, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fracture healing time, postoperative complications and Harris hip scores at the last follow-up. \n \n \nResults \nThere were no significant differences between the 2 groups of patients in their preoperative general data, indicating they were compatible(P>0.05). All the 67 patients were followed up for 20 to 30 months (average, 24 months). The anatomic reduction rate in group A [94.6% (35/37)] was significantly higher than that in group B [83.3% (25/30)]; the reduction time, operation time and fracture healing time in group A (33.2±4.6 min, 70.2±5.0 min and 4.6±0.7 months) were significantly shorter than those in group B (45.8±8.6 min, 90.6±9.2 min and 5.6±0.6 months); the Harris hip scores at the last follow-up in group A (84.3±8.6 points) were significantly higher than in group B (81.2±7.8 points) (all P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nReduction assisted by a double-needle repositor is fine for femoral neck fractures of Garden types of Ⅲ-Ⅳ, because it has advantages of limited invasion, simplicity, a high rate of anatomical reduction, quick reduction and good functional recovery. \n \n \nKey words: \nFemoral neck fractures; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone nails; Reduction; Double-needle repositor","PeriodicalId":10145,"journal":{"name":"中华创伤骨科杂志","volume":"21 1","pages":"758-763"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor for femoral neck fractures of Garden types III-IV\",\"authors\":\"Jie-chang Ren, Xin Lyu, Fei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the efficacy between reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor and manual reduction in the treatment of femoral neck fractures of Garden types Ⅲ-Ⅳ. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom May 2015 to October 2017, 67 patients with femoral neck fracture of Garden type Ⅲ or Ⅳ were treated by hollow screw fixation at Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Shanxi Medical University. They were divided into 2 groups according to the different reduction methods. The reduction was assisted by a double-needle repositor in 37 cases (group A); they were 21 males and 16 females with an age of 46.2±8.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 24 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The reduction was conducted manually in another 30 cases (group B); they were 18 males and 12 females with an age of 48.8±9.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 17 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The 2 groups were compared in terms of reduction time, anatomical reduction rate, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fracture healing time, postoperative complications and Harris hip scores at the last follow-up. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were no significant differences between the 2 groups of patients in their preoperative general data, indicating they were compatible(P>0.05). All the 67 patients were followed up for 20 to 30 months (average, 24 months). The anatomic reduction rate in group A [94.6% (35/37)] was significantly higher than that in group B [83.3% (25/30)]; the reduction time, operation time and fracture healing time in group A (33.2±4.6 min, 70.2±5.0 min and 4.6±0.7 months) were significantly shorter than those in group B (45.8±8.6 min, 90.6±9.2 min and 5.6±0.6 months); the Harris hip scores at the last follow-up in group A (84.3±8.6 points) were significantly higher than in group B (81.2±7.8 points) (all P 0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nReduction assisted by a double-needle repositor is fine for femoral neck fractures of Garden types of Ⅲ-Ⅳ, because it has advantages of limited invasion, simplicity, a high rate of anatomical reduction, quick reduction and good functional recovery. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nFemoral neck fractures; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone nails; Reduction; Double-needle repositor\",\"PeriodicalId\":10145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"758-763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.09.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华创伤骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.09.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较双针复位器复位与手法复位治疗GardenⅢ-Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折的疗效。方法2015年5月至2017年10月,在山西医科大学附属第二医院骨科对67例GardenⅢ、Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折患者进行空心螺钉内固定治疗。根据还原方法的不同,将其分为2组。双针复位器辅助复位37例(a组);男21例,女16例,年龄46.2±8.1岁,GardenⅢ型13例,GardenⅣ型24例。另有30例(B组)采用人工复位;男18例,女12例,年龄48.8±9.1岁,GardenⅢ型13例,GardenⅣ型17例。比较两组在最后一次随访时复位时间、解剖复位率、手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症和Harris髋关节评分。结果两组患者术前一般数据无显著差异,符合要求(P>0.05),67例患者均随访20~30个月(平均24个月)。解剖复位率A组[94.6%(35/37)]明显高于B组[8.3%(25/30)];A组复位时间、手术时间和骨折愈合时间(33.2±4.6分钟、70.2±5.0分钟和4.6±0.7个月)明显短于B组(45.8±8.6分钟、90.6±9.2分钟和5.6±0.6个月);A组最后一次随访Harris髋关节评分(84.3±8.6分)明显高于B组(81.2±7.8分)(P均0.05),还原快,功能恢复好。关键词:股骨颈骨折;骨折内固定术;骨钉;减少;双针复位器
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor for femoral neck fractures of Garden types III-IV
Objective To compare the efficacy between reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor and manual reduction in the treatment of femoral neck fractures of Garden types Ⅲ-Ⅳ. Methods From May 2015 to October 2017, 67 patients with femoral neck fracture of Garden type Ⅲ or Ⅳ were treated by hollow screw fixation at Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Shanxi Medical University. They were divided into 2 groups according to the different reduction methods. The reduction was assisted by a double-needle repositor in 37 cases (group A); they were 21 males and 16 females with an age of 46.2±8.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 24 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The reduction was conducted manually in another 30 cases (group B); they were 18 males and 12 females with an age of 48.8±9.1 years and there were 13 cases of Garden type Ⅲ and 17 cases of Garden type Ⅳ. The 2 groups were compared in terms of reduction time, anatomical reduction rate, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fracture healing time, postoperative complications and Harris hip scores at the last follow-up. Results There were no significant differences between the 2 groups of patients in their preoperative general data, indicating they were compatible(P>0.05). All the 67 patients were followed up for 20 to 30 months (average, 24 months). The anatomic reduction rate in group A [94.6% (35/37)] was significantly higher than that in group B [83.3% (25/30)]; the reduction time, operation time and fracture healing time in group A (33.2±4.6 min, 70.2±5.0 min and 4.6±0.7 months) were significantly shorter than those in group B (45.8±8.6 min, 90.6±9.2 min and 5.6±0.6 months); the Harris hip scores at the last follow-up in group A (84.3±8.6 points) were significantly higher than in group B (81.2±7.8 points) (all P 0.05). Conclusion Reduction assisted by a double-needle repositor is fine for femoral neck fractures of Garden types of Ⅲ-Ⅳ, because it has advantages of limited invasion, simplicity, a high rate of anatomical reduction, quick reduction and good functional recovery. Key words: Femoral neck fractures; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone nails; Reduction; Double-needle repositor
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7288
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信