手术治疗新生血管性青光眼的疗效回顾性分析

Q4 Medicine
A. Zolotarev, E. Karlova, M. V. Radaikina, A. A. Kuz'mina, O. Ryzhkova
{"title":"手术治疗新生血管性青光眼的疗效回顾性分析","authors":"A. Zolotarev, E. Karlova, M. V. Radaikina, A. A. Kuz'mina, O. Ryzhkova","doi":"10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-2-12-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: to compare the results of neovascular glaucoma (NVG) surgery of patients treated for the underlying eye disease with antiVEGF therapy and laser coagulation (LC) of the retina with the surgery results of patients who did not receive underlying disease treatment.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of case histories and outpatient charts of 70 patients (70 eyes) with NVG, operated in a surgical hospital, involved two groups of patients: group 1 — 33 eyes of patients treated for the underlying disease with anti-VEGF therapy and/or LC; of these, 13 eyes (39 %) received panretinal LC, 15 eyes (45 %) received an anti-VEGF drug intravitreally, and 5 eyes (16 %) received both anti-VEGF therapy and LC); group 2 — 37 eyes of patients not treated for the underlying disease. In group 1, NVG was caused by diabetic retinopathy (DR), which accounted for 19 eyes (57.6 %), and post-thrombotic retinopathy (PR) — 14 eyes (42.3 %). IOP data in group 1 at admission was 38.00 ± 6.82 mm Hg. In group 2, the proportion of patients with DR was 32 % (12 eyes), and those with PR — 41 % (15 eyes). The level of IOP in group 1 upon hospital admission was 38.00 ± 6.82 mm Hg, while in group 2 it was 35.97 ± 5.85 mm Hg.Results. In group 1, in most cases, the classical surgical approach to NVG treatment was used. The proportion of Ahmed drainage implantations was 46 % (15 eyes), trabeculectomy (TET) — 24 % (8 eyes), non-penetrating sinustrabeculectomy (NST) — 6 % (2 eyes), and only 24 % (8 eyes) received transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CPC). After 7 days, the average level of IOP in group 1 was 16.80 ± 7.18 mm Hg, after 1 month, 19.50 ± 3.45 mm Hg, after 3 months, 21.80 ± 3.15 mm Hg, and after 6 months — 22.57 ± 3.34 mm Hg (p < 0.05). In group 2, the operation of choice was CFC, which was performed in 46 % (17 eyes), the Ahmed drainage was implanted less often — 36 % (13 eyes), while 18 % (7 eyes) accounted for TET. The IOP level in group 2 after 7 days was 20.00 ± 8.74 mm Hg, after 1 month, 25.30 ± 4.67 mm Hg, after 3 months 28.43 ± 6.54 mm Hg, and after 6 months 29.73 ± 4.18 mm Hg (p < 0.05).Conclusion. The timely treatment of the underlying disease with Anti-VEGF and LC of the retina allows the patient to maintain visual functions, and increases the effectiveness of NVG surgery.","PeriodicalId":36080,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskii Oftal''mologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of surgical treatment of neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Zolotarev, E. Karlova, M. V. Radaikina, A. A. Kuz'mina, O. Ryzhkova\",\"doi\":\"10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-2-12-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: to compare the results of neovascular glaucoma (NVG) surgery of patients treated for the underlying eye disease with antiVEGF therapy and laser coagulation (LC) of the retina with the surgery results of patients who did not receive underlying disease treatment.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of case histories and outpatient charts of 70 patients (70 eyes) with NVG, operated in a surgical hospital, involved two groups of patients: group 1 — 33 eyes of patients treated for the underlying disease with anti-VEGF therapy and/or LC; of these, 13 eyes (39 %) received panretinal LC, 15 eyes (45 %) received an anti-VEGF drug intravitreally, and 5 eyes (16 %) received both anti-VEGF therapy and LC); group 2 — 37 eyes of patients not treated for the underlying disease. In group 1, NVG was caused by diabetic retinopathy (DR), which accounted for 19 eyes (57.6 %), and post-thrombotic retinopathy (PR) — 14 eyes (42.3 %). IOP data in group 1 at admission was 38.00 ± 6.82 mm Hg. In group 2, the proportion of patients with DR was 32 % (12 eyes), and those with PR — 41 % (15 eyes). The level of IOP in group 1 upon hospital admission was 38.00 ± 6.82 mm Hg, while in group 2 it was 35.97 ± 5.85 mm Hg.Results. In group 1, in most cases, the classical surgical approach to NVG treatment was used. The proportion of Ahmed drainage implantations was 46 % (15 eyes), trabeculectomy (TET) — 24 % (8 eyes), non-penetrating sinustrabeculectomy (NST) — 6 % (2 eyes), and only 24 % (8 eyes) received transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CPC). After 7 days, the average level of IOP in group 1 was 16.80 ± 7.18 mm Hg, after 1 month, 19.50 ± 3.45 mm Hg, after 3 months, 21.80 ± 3.15 mm Hg, and after 6 months — 22.57 ± 3.34 mm Hg (p < 0.05). In group 2, the operation of choice was CFC, which was performed in 46 % (17 eyes), the Ahmed drainage was implanted less often — 36 % (13 eyes), while 18 % (7 eyes) accounted for TET. The IOP level in group 2 after 7 days was 20.00 ± 8.74 mm Hg, after 1 month, 25.30 ± 4.67 mm Hg, after 3 months 28.43 ± 6.54 mm Hg, and after 6 months 29.73 ± 4.18 mm Hg (p < 0.05).Conclusion. The timely treatment of the underlying disease with Anti-VEGF and LC of the retina allows the patient to maintain visual functions, and increases the effectiveness of NVG surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rossiiskii Oftal''mologicheskii Zhurnal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rossiiskii Oftal''mologicheskii Zhurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-2-12-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskii Oftal''mologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-2-12-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较接受抗VEGF治疗和视网膜激光凝固(LC)治疗的基础眼病患者的新生血管性青光眼(NVG)手术结果与未接受基础疾病治疗的患者的手术结果。材料和方法。在外科医院手术的70名NVG患者(70眼)的病例史和门诊病历的回顾性分析涉及两组患者:第1组——33眼接受抗VEGF治疗和/或LC治疗的潜在疾病患者;其中13眼(39%)接受全视网膜LC,15眼(45%)玻璃体内接受抗VEGF药物,5眼(16%)同时接受抗VEGF治疗和LC;第2组——37眼未接受基础疾病治疗的患者。在第1组中,NVG由糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)引起,占19眼(57.6%),血栓形成后视网膜病变(PR)14眼(42.3%)。第1组入院时的眼压数据为38.00±6.82毫米汞柱。在第2组中,DR患者的比例为32%(12眼),PR患者的比例是41%(15眼)。第一组入院时的眼压水平为38.00±6.82 mm Hg,而第二组为35.97±5.85 mm Hg。Ahmed引流植入术的比例为46%(15眼),小梁切除术(TET)为24%(8眼),非穿透性小窦切除术(NST)为6%(2眼),只有24%(8只眼)接受了经巩膜睫状体光凝术(CPC)。7天后,第1组的平均眼压水平为16.80±7.18 mm Hg,1个月后为19.50±3.45 mm Hg,3个月后21.80±3.15 mm Hg,6个月后22.57±3.34 mm Hg(p<0.05)。第2组选择CFC手术,46%(17眼),Ahmed引流术较少植入,36%(13眼),而TET占18%(7眼)。第2组7天后眼压为20.00±8.74mm Hg,1个月后为25.30±4.67mm Hg,3个月后28.43±6.54mm Hg,6个月后29.73±4.18mm Hg(p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency of surgical treatment of neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective analysis
Purpose: to compare the results of neovascular glaucoma (NVG) surgery of patients treated for the underlying eye disease with antiVEGF therapy and laser coagulation (LC) of the retina with the surgery results of patients who did not receive underlying disease treatment.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of case histories and outpatient charts of 70 patients (70 eyes) with NVG, operated in a surgical hospital, involved two groups of patients: group 1 — 33 eyes of patients treated for the underlying disease with anti-VEGF therapy and/or LC; of these, 13 eyes (39 %) received panretinal LC, 15 eyes (45 %) received an anti-VEGF drug intravitreally, and 5 eyes (16 %) received both anti-VEGF therapy and LC); group 2 — 37 eyes of patients not treated for the underlying disease. In group 1, NVG was caused by diabetic retinopathy (DR), which accounted for 19 eyes (57.6 %), and post-thrombotic retinopathy (PR) — 14 eyes (42.3 %). IOP data in group 1 at admission was 38.00 ± 6.82 mm Hg. In group 2, the proportion of patients with DR was 32 % (12 eyes), and those with PR — 41 % (15 eyes). The level of IOP in group 1 upon hospital admission was 38.00 ± 6.82 mm Hg, while in group 2 it was 35.97 ± 5.85 mm Hg.Results. In group 1, in most cases, the classical surgical approach to NVG treatment was used. The proportion of Ahmed drainage implantations was 46 % (15 eyes), trabeculectomy (TET) — 24 % (8 eyes), non-penetrating sinustrabeculectomy (NST) — 6 % (2 eyes), and only 24 % (8 eyes) received transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CPC). After 7 days, the average level of IOP in group 1 was 16.80 ± 7.18 mm Hg, after 1 month, 19.50 ± 3.45 mm Hg, after 3 months, 21.80 ± 3.15 mm Hg, and after 6 months — 22.57 ± 3.34 mm Hg (p < 0.05). In group 2, the operation of choice was CFC, which was performed in 46 % (17 eyes), the Ahmed drainage was implanted less often — 36 % (13 eyes), while 18 % (7 eyes) accounted for TET. The IOP level in group 2 after 7 days was 20.00 ± 8.74 mm Hg, after 1 month, 25.30 ± 4.67 mm Hg, after 3 months 28.43 ± 6.54 mm Hg, and after 6 months 29.73 ± 4.18 mm Hg (p < 0.05).Conclusion. The timely treatment of the underlying disease with Anti-VEGF and LC of the retina allows the patient to maintain visual functions, and increases the effectiveness of NVG surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信