M. Bhushan, D. Tripathi, G. Yadav, L. Kumar, S. Barik, S. Tandon, Pawan Kumar, S. Mitra, M. Gairola
{"title":"应用保形和IMRT技术治疗宫颈癌对比剂对不同光子能量的剂量影响及其在国产体模中的验证","authors":"M. Bhushan, D. Tripathi, G. Yadav, L. Kumar, S. Barik, S. Tandon, Pawan Kumar, S. Mitra, M. Gairola","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2021.54553.1896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Considering the unwanted exposure to organs in path of the beam, 4-field (4F) and subsequently, Intensity-modulated-radiation-therapy (IMRT), is known as standard mode of treatment of carcinoma cervix. It is routine practice to inject intravenous contrast during simulation scan which elopes after that from patient body. Therefore, the impact of contrast media should be investigated for radiation dose calculations.Material & MethodsAn indigenously made phantom, named as ‘original contrast (OC)’, was used with dimensions 15 x 15 x 30 cm3. A sleeve was given to place the ionization chamber at the isocentre of the planning target volume (PTV) inside the cylindrical vial of iodinized contrast. Similarly, a virtual phantom was created with similar dimensions in presence and absence of contrast media, called as ‘virtual contrast (VC)’ and ‘virtual without contrast (VWC)’ phantom. Plans were generated with photon energies (6MV/10MV/15MV/6FFF/10FFF) using 4F and IMRT technique. Plans were evaluated for PTV (D99%, D10%, Dmean) and Bladder & Rectum (V30Gy, V10Gy). Normal-tissue-integral-dose (NTID) and total-monitor-units (TMU) were also evaluated.Results D99% of the PTV was comparable in VC and VWC phantoms but was decreased for OC phantom. Similarly, D10% was reportedly higher as 54.03 Gy (4F, 6 MV), 54.71 Gy (4F, 15 MV), 55.78 Gy (4F, 6 FFF) and 57.64 Gy (4F, 10 FFF) for OC phantom. D30% of the bladder and also the NTID was lesser for IMRT cases in all the selected phantoms. Additionally, 4F has shown lesser spillage with 6MV/15 MV photon beam energies in OC phantom. The ‘total monitor units (TMU)’ required for IMRT plans were significantly higher.ConclusionThe contrast material under-estimate the planned dose yet has insignificant influence on the dose calculation. Therefore, unnecessary exposure of dual scans should be avoided and use of 6MV and IMRT technique should be continued in the clinics.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric impact of contrast medium on different photon energies using conformal & IMRT techniques in the treatment of carcinoma cervix and its validation with indigenous phantom\",\"authors\":\"M. Bhushan, D. Tripathi, G. Yadav, L. Kumar, S. Barik, S. Tandon, Pawan Kumar, S. Mitra, M. Gairola\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/IJMP.2021.54553.1896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Considering the unwanted exposure to organs in path of the beam, 4-field (4F) and subsequently, Intensity-modulated-radiation-therapy (IMRT), is known as standard mode of treatment of carcinoma cervix. It is routine practice to inject intravenous contrast during simulation scan which elopes after that from patient body. Therefore, the impact of contrast media should be investigated for radiation dose calculations.Material & MethodsAn indigenously made phantom, named as ‘original contrast (OC)’, was used with dimensions 15 x 15 x 30 cm3. A sleeve was given to place the ionization chamber at the isocentre of the planning target volume (PTV) inside the cylindrical vial of iodinized contrast. Similarly, a virtual phantom was created with similar dimensions in presence and absence of contrast media, called as ‘virtual contrast (VC)’ and ‘virtual without contrast (VWC)’ phantom. Plans were generated with photon energies (6MV/10MV/15MV/6FFF/10FFF) using 4F and IMRT technique. Plans were evaluated for PTV (D99%, D10%, Dmean) and Bladder & Rectum (V30Gy, V10Gy). Normal-tissue-integral-dose (NTID) and total-monitor-units (TMU) were also evaluated.Results D99% of the PTV was comparable in VC and VWC phantoms but was decreased for OC phantom. Similarly, D10% was reportedly higher as 54.03 Gy (4F, 6 MV), 54.71 Gy (4F, 15 MV), 55.78 Gy (4F, 6 FFF) and 57.64 Gy (4F, 10 FFF) for OC phantom. D30% of the bladder and also the NTID was lesser for IMRT cases in all the selected phantoms. Additionally, 4F has shown lesser spillage with 6MV/15 MV photon beam energies in OC phantom. The ‘total monitor units (TMU)’ required for IMRT plans were significantly higher.ConclusionThe contrast material under-estimate the planned dose yet has insignificant influence on the dose calculation. Therefore, unnecessary exposure of dual scans should be avoided and use of 6MV and IMRT technique should be continued in the clinics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2021.54553.1896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2021.54553.1896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言考虑到光束路径中不必要的器官暴露,4场(4F)和随后的调强放射治疗(IMRT)被称为宫颈癌的标准治疗模式。常规做法是在模拟扫描过程中注射静脉造影剂,然后从患者体内脱落。因此,为了计算辐射剂量,应研究造影剂的影响。材料和方法使用一种国产体模,称为“原始对比度(OC)”,尺寸为15 x 15 x 30 cm3。在碘化造影剂的圆柱形小瓶内,将电离室放置在计划目标体积(PTV)的等中心处。类似地,在存在和不存在造影剂的情况下,创建了具有相似尺寸的虚拟体模,称为“虚拟对比度(VC)”和“无对比度的虚拟体模型(VWC)”。使用4F和IMRT技术用光子能量(6MV/10MV/15MV/6FF/10FFF)生成计划。对PTV(D99%,D10%,Dmean)和膀胱直肠(V30Gy,V10Gy)的计划进行了评估。还评估了正常组织积分剂量(NTID)和总监测单位(TMU)。结果VC和VWC体模的PTV D99%具有可比性,但OC体模PTV下降。类似地,据报道,OC体模的D10%更高,分别为54.03Gy(4F,6MV)、54.71Gy(3F,15MV)、55.78Gy(2F,6FFF)和57.64Gy(4F,10FFF)。在所有选定的体模中,膀胱的D30%以及IMRT病例的NTID都较小。此外,4F在OC体模中显示出6MV/15MV光子束能量的较小溢出。IMRT计划所需的“总监测单元(TMU)”明显更高。结论造影剂低估了计划剂量,但对剂量计算影响不大。因此,应避免不必要的双扫描暴露,并应在诊所继续使用6MV和IMRT技术。
Dosimetric impact of contrast medium on different photon energies using conformal & IMRT techniques in the treatment of carcinoma cervix and its validation with indigenous phantom
Introduction Considering the unwanted exposure to organs in path of the beam, 4-field (4F) and subsequently, Intensity-modulated-radiation-therapy (IMRT), is known as standard mode of treatment of carcinoma cervix. It is routine practice to inject intravenous contrast during simulation scan which elopes after that from patient body. Therefore, the impact of contrast media should be investigated for radiation dose calculations.Material & MethodsAn indigenously made phantom, named as ‘original contrast (OC)’, was used with dimensions 15 x 15 x 30 cm3. A sleeve was given to place the ionization chamber at the isocentre of the planning target volume (PTV) inside the cylindrical vial of iodinized contrast. Similarly, a virtual phantom was created with similar dimensions in presence and absence of contrast media, called as ‘virtual contrast (VC)’ and ‘virtual without contrast (VWC)’ phantom. Plans were generated with photon energies (6MV/10MV/15MV/6FFF/10FFF) using 4F and IMRT technique. Plans were evaluated for PTV (D99%, D10%, Dmean) and Bladder & Rectum (V30Gy, V10Gy). Normal-tissue-integral-dose (NTID) and total-monitor-units (TMU) were also evaluated.Results D99% of the PTV was comparable in VC and VWC phantoms but was decreased for OC phantom. Similarly, D10% was reportedly higher as 54.03 Gy (4F, 6 MV), 54.71 Gy (4F, 15 MV), 55.78 Gy (4F, 6 FFF) and 57.64 Gy (4F, 10 FFF) for OC phantom. D30% of the bladder and also the NTID was lesser for IMRT cases in all the selected phantoms. Additionally, 4F has shown lesser spillage with 6MV/15 MV photon beam energies in OC phantom. The ‘total monitor units (TMU)’ required for IMRT plans were significantly higher.ConclusionThe contrast material under-estimate the planned dose yet has insignificant influence on the dose calculation. Therefore, unnecessary exposure of dual scans should be avoided and use of 6MV and IMRT technique should be continued in the clinics.
期刊介绍:
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.